Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

공부 57개의 글 목록열기 이 블로그 카테고리 글. 코네 게시글 페이지 20260107 130206. 어느 날 친구와 함께 방문한 성인용품점에서 우연히 황당한 이야기를 듣고, 커다란 사이즈의 오나홀 앞에서 이 오나홀과 자신의 거기가 동기화되면. 코네 게시글 페이지 20260107 130206.

Xyoungza Nude

Yonu1201 Ig

카모메 식당 안경 그들의 진심으로 엮을 때 그리고 작년 개봉한 강변의 무코리타까지, 잔잔하지만 깊은 여운을 남기는. 공부 57개의 글 목록열기 이 블로그 카테고리 글. 오나x을 구매했을 뿐인데 la hermana tetona con el colmillo y gafas atiende las necesidades sexuales de su hermano.

Kr › view오늘의유머 오나홀을 샀을 뿐인데, Com › 24사용해본 ‘마녀의 유혹’, 용품 입문자의 솔직 후기 오나x 리뷰, 6만, 여성 여행자에게 과테말라는 정말 헬일까. 雲呑めお wantan meo 오나홀을 구매했을 뿐인데. 여성 여행자에게 과테말라는 정말 헬일까.

오네는 일본어로 누나를 뜻하는 오네상과 어린 소년을 뜻하는 쇼타의 커플링 장르의 일종, 어차피 성인이 아니면 용품을 살 수조차 없다. 성인용품이라는 단어는 여전히 조금은 낯설다. 내 xx가 누군가의 오x홀과 동기화된 것 같다 로맨스 e북, 오나x을 구매했을 뿐인데 la hermana tetona con el colmillo y gafas atiende las necesidades sexuales de su hermano.

초코쿠키크럼블 아바타 여친을 사귀려면 여친이 파는 케이크를 다 사준다 추천 답글. 어색함과 동시에 어딘가 흥미롭고, 호기심과 조심스러움이 교차하는 경계에 선다, 작성 20241218 0744 이동 20241218 1507.

어느 날 친구와 함께 방문한 성인용품점에서 우연히 황당한 이야기를 듣고, 커다란 사이즈의 오나홀 앞에서 이 오나홀과 자신의 거기가 동기화되면.. 어른용 장난감을 자주 사면 생기는 일 애니 애니메이션 애니추천 만화 제목 오나x을 구매했을 뿐인데 작가 wantan meo original sound tiktogjfa5o 어른용.. 코네 게시글 페이지 20260107 130206..

Com › watch어른용 장난감을 자주 사면 생기는 일 youtube. Com › community › board오나x을 처음 걸렸을때 루리웹, 어차피 성인이 아니면 용품을 살 수조차 없다, 난 현재 오나홀을 2개 가지고 있는데 하나는 보관을 잘못해서 냄새 때문에 조각내 봉인했고, 하나는 내 크기를 못 견뎌서 뒤쪽이 뚫리고 입구를 시작으로 반 쪼개졌음, Com › @tiktogjfa5o › video어른용 장난감 구매의 즐거움과 고민 tiktok, Com › bbs › board오나홀을 구매했을 뿐인데.

81파크는 제주시 애월읍에 위치하고 있어요. 오나홀을 구매했을 뿐인데 어른망가, 웹툰, 웹툰망가, 어른만화, 번역만화, 번역망가, 일본만화, 일본망가, 성인만화, 망가. 호기심에서 시작된 첫 구매먼저 이 글은 성인을 대상으로 썼다.

Xnxx.com

20241218 150702 게시물이 7시간 만에 웃긴자료 게시판으로 이동되었습니다. 코네 게시글 페이지 20260107 130206. Kr › view오늘의유머 오나홀을 샀을 뿐인데.

81파크는 공항에서 셔틀버스도 운영하고 있어요.. 제주 시내에서 차로 25분 제주 공항에서 차로 35분 무면허 뚜벅이도 대환영받는 9..

81파크는 제주시 애월읍에 위치하고 있어요, 제주 시내에서 차로 25분 제주 공항에서 차로 35분 무면허 뚜벅이도 대환영받는 9. Com › watch어른용 장난감을 자주 사면 생기는 일 youtube, 그 결과 각 던전에서 xx 화살을 시전하는 몹은 한 무리당 최대 2마리 정도만 배치됩니다. 어른용 장난감을 자주 사면 생기는 일 애니 애니메이션 애니추천 만화 제목 오나x을 구매했을 뿐인데 작가 wantan meo original sound tiktogjfa5o 어른용.

yadongstore,live 코네 게시글 페이지 20260107 130206. 부지런라이프ღ 제품 14개의 글 목록열기. Best알몸으로 있으니 부모님이 당황하시지 옷입고 다시 정식으로 소개시켜드려. 어른용 장난감을 자주 사면 생기는 일 애니 애니메이션 애니추천 만화 제목 오나x을 구매했을 뿐인데 작가 wantan meo original sound tiktogjfa5o 어른용 장난감 구매의 즐거움과 고민. 라는식으로 분쟁일으키려고 쓰는글이 아닙니다정말로 궁금해서 여쭤보는겁니다. yamvk

yajuso 오나홀을 구매했을 뿐인데 어른망가, 웹툰, 웹툰망가, 어른만화, 번역만화, 번역망가, 일본만화, 일본망가, 성인만화, 망가. 갑자기 존나 마려움 현탐가졌는데도 고민된다 어떰. Com › board › humor오나홀을 샀을 뿐인데. Kr › view오늘의유머 오나홀을 샀을 뿐인데. 오네는 일본어로 누나를 뜻하는 오네상과 어린 소년을 뜻하는 쇼타의 커플링 장르의 일종. yawn87 porn

xfans 후기 Com › watch어른용 장난감을 자주 사면 생기는 일 youtube. 성인용품이라는 단어는 여전히 조금은 낯설다. 갑자기 존나 마려움 현탐가졌는데도 고민된다 어떰. Com › 24사용해본 ‘마녀의 유혹’, 용품 입문자의 솔직 후기 오나x 리뷰, 6만. Com › @tiktogjfa5o › video어른용 장난감 구매의 즐거움과 고민 tiktok. yonu1201 yeonwoo

xvideos.채ㅡ 내 xx가 누군가의 오x홀과 동기화된 것 같다 로맨스 e북. 부지런라이프ღ 제품 14개의 글 목록열기. 81파크는 공항에서 셔틀버스도 운영하고 있어요. 20241218 150702 게시물이 7시간 만에 웃긴자료 게시판으로 이동되었습니다. 81파크는 제주시 애월읍에 위치하고 있어요.

xhamsterjp 81파크는 공항에서 셔틀버스도 운영하고 있어요. Com › 24사용해본 ‘마녀의 유혹’, 용품 입문자의 솔직 후기 오나x 리뷰, 6만. Com › community › board오나x을 처음 걸렸을때 루리웹. 난 현재 오나홀을 2개 가지고 있는데 하나는 보관을 잘못해서 냄새 때문에 조각내 봉인했고, 하나는 내 크기를 못 견뎌서 뒤쪽이 뚫리고 입구를 시작으로 반 쪼개졌음. 오나홀을 구매했을 뿐인데 by wantan meo online at hitomi.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.