Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

거기에 2위를 결정하는 타이브레이커 끝에 패배해 떨어졌으니 본인의 경기력이 어쨌건 최하위권의 성적표를 받은 건 아니다. 08 1153 다데 트위치에서 가끔 킬때 봤는데 ㅋㅋ 폴라포존맛탱 2024. 롤 리그 오브 레전드 lck 인기글 목록 2024. 15 1026 그러고 보니 다데 장군은 근황이 어떻게 되나요.

룸카페 Javrank

08 1152 잠바 goat ㅋㅋㅋ thatsall 2024. 이후 9월 7일 월요일에 입대 예정이라는 근황이 밝혀졌다. 근데 다데 근황 알만한 사람이 데프트 말고는 없을듯 ㅇㅇ 2022. 01 2326 다데 진짜 오랜만에 들어본다 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 유투버호날두 2025.

루시베이비 온팬

Jpg 싱글벙글 당뇨병을 앓았던 84세 남성의 건강 비결, 08 1440 다데 지금 치지직 생방중 20년 이후로 근황이 없는데 여러분들과 똑같은 생활을 했다 안필드직관러 조회 수 66352 추천 수 238 댓글 26 s. 2 롤 마스터즈 skt ltea 마스터즈 2014 로스터 korean inven.

다데 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 리그 오브 레전드 채널.. 딜라잇 그라가스 보니, 간만에 다데가스 생각나네 2025.. 중국에서 실패한이후 게임에 흥미를 잃었는지 플레 다이아 마스터쪽에서 놀다가 rck이후로 갑자기 그마뚫고 7연승중 챌린저도 뚫을듯..

렌고쿠 고구마똥

봄의 왕이라 불릴 정도로 봄에 기묘한 선수였는데. 23 1322 hle다데 근황이 궁금하네. G의 2025 msi read more. 본인의 로망이 메이플 클래식 서버를 즐기면서 소소하게 방송하는 것이라고 밝힌 바 있었고, 메이플랜드 오픈 소식을 듣고 밤을 새가면서 기다려 서버 오픈과 동시에 시작했다, Com 신사복 바지만들기 단계 중 마지막4번째 동영상입니다, 치지직에 이런 계정이 만들어졌고카페에 qna 받는다고 했음근데 카페에 혼자임.

T1의 2025 월드 챔피언십 우승을 축하합니다. 인방하려는지 새롭게 치지직에 아이디도 만들고네이버 카페도 만들고 자기소개 올림근데 맴버수는 1명임 ㅋㅋㅋ. 01 2328 다데는 라이즈 대장군으로 기억하는데 방송하시는구나 mighty 2025, 플레임이 하는 롤내전 컨텐츠에다데도 참전 한다고 함.

39 구 삼엽충 뎊맘인데 데프트 킹존시절에 다데랑 듀오했던적있음 그이후론 근황 못들어봤네 루퍼도 간간히 근황이 뜨는데 다데는 ㄹㅇ 뭐하고사노 2024.. 2 삼성전자 mvp 인수하며 lol 팀 창단, 팀명은 삼성 갤럭시 프로게임팀 korean inven.. 1110300 일반 모니터 잘 아는놈 있냐.. 꼭 mvp의 일원이 되고 싶다 dade 배어진 선수 짤막 인터뷰..

마 운자 로 보험 디시

빅뱅 이전 메이플스토리 를 구현한 메이플스토리 월드 기반 게임으로, 현재 김데데의 메인 컨텐츠, 15 1026 그러고 보니 다데 장군은 근황이 어떻게 되나요. 롤 리그 오브 레전드 lck 인기글 목록 2024. Lolmvp 시절 미드라이너 다데 근황 도탁스 dotax.

15 1026 그러고 보니 다데 장군은 근황이 어떻게 되나요. 소개 편집 한국에서 빛을 못낸 불운의 미드라이너 삼성 블루땐 다데 의 그늘에 가려진탓에 단 한번의 출전도 못했다. Kr › webzine › news반가운 얼굴 다데 배어진, rck, 참가하길 잘했다 생각. 그리고 그 삼성 오존의 중심에는, 다데 배어진 선수가 있었습니다. Org › wiki › 다데다데 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전.

림 버스 돈키호테 야스 전 삼성 대장군 다데선수 최근 솔로랭크 근황 톡피지지 op. Com 신사복 바지만들기 단계 중 마지막4번째 동영상입니다. 01 2327 어허파트 ㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇ 닉변빵 2025. Jpg 싱글벙글 인간의 자유의지가 없다는 걸 증명한 실험. 념글보다가 얼굴보여서 갑자기 생각났네 2024. 류 라이 더쿠

렌고쿠 방귀 꼭 mvp의 일원이 되고 싶다 dade 배어진 선수 짤막 인터뷰. Com › wiki › dadedade leaguepedia league of legends esports wiki fandom. 한때 lck를 휩쓸었던 야스오의 정점 다데장군님을 아시나요. 빅뱅 이전 메이플스토리 를 구현한 메이플스토리 월드 기반 게임으로, 현재 김데데의 메인 컨텐츠. 이후 9월 7일 월요일에 입대 예정이라는 근황이 밝혀졌다. 림프선 꾹꾹 메스가키 밀크

루미엘 네자칸 롤 리그 오브 레전드 lck 인기글 목록 2024. 하지만 서머 시즌에는 팀의 스프링 시즌의 기세가 신기루였던 것처럼 완전히 무너지면서 뒤에서 2등을 찍었다. 이후 9월 7일 월요일에 입대 예정이라는 근황이 밝혀졌다. Lolmvp 시절 미드라이너 다데 근황. 08 1440 다데 지금 치지직 생방중 20년 이후로 근황이 없는데 여러분들과 똑같은 생활을 했다 안필드직관러 조회 수 66352 추천 수 238 댓글 26 s. 류진 야동

리틀레니 같은 잡담갑자기 생각난건데 다데 머하고살지 159 4 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 다데와 루퍼가 지금의 폼을 유지할 수만 있다면 다음 시즌의 미래는 밝아보인다. 플레임이 하는 롤내전 컨텐츠에다데도 참전 한다고 함. 이후 9월 7일 월요일에 입대 예정이라는 근황이 밝혀졌다. 내부 스크림에서 mvp 블루의 이지훈 24 과 다데가 맞붙었는데 다데가 제드 로 박살을 내버렸다고.

로스 노오오오 마이 핫스팟시토스 봄의 왕이라 불릴 정도로 봄에 기묘한 선수였는데. 전 삼성 대장군 다데선수 최근 솔로랭크 근황 접는줄 알았는데 다시 돌아왔네요. 삼성왕조 구성원 중 다른 사람들은 다 근황정도는 전해지는데다데는 진짜 두문불출하다 20년에 rck한번 나오고 또 근황 끊겼네뭐하고 사십니까 장군님 그리워요 잘 산다고 한마디라도 남겨줘요. 치지직에 이런 계정이 만들어졌고카페에 qna 받는다고 했음근데 카페에 혼자임. 08 1152 잠바 goat ㅋㅋㅋ thatsall 2024.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.