Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

438k followers, 180 following, 1,256 posts dorothy도로시 @mgain83 on instagram 🇰🇷🇰🇷🇰🇷🇰🇷🇰🇷🇰🇷🇰🇷🇰🇷🇰🇷🇰🇷 유튜브 dorothy도로시 검색😊 아래 링크 클릭. 438k followers, 180 following, 1,256 posts dorothy도로시 @mgain83 on instagram 🇰🇷🇰🇷🇰🇷🇰🇷🇰🇷🇰🇷🇰🇷🇰🇷🇰🇷🇰🇷 유튜브 dorothy도로시 검색😊 아래 링크 클릭. 애칭을 바꿔야 겠다 싶어 유튜브 커뮤니티에 글을 올렸고, 좋아요 수가 많은 도집사를 선택해서 만들어진 단어다. 도로시 엉덩이 마우스 패드 승리의 여신 니케.

Molding the real mold, 라이프스타일 모든 곳에서 진정한 착용 감각을 제공하는 도로시와 공식 온라인 스토어.. 니케 스토리 로맨스 드라마 마니아로 사랑에 대한 환상을 가지고 있는 스카우팅 스쿼드의 유능한 통신병.. 찰져보이길래 쳐봤어요도로롱도 따봉 날려주네요sx..

Kemonoparty Tslove

한동훈200 짤 하 도로시 엉덩이 못참겠다 진짜 5 샹들켓2001 념글 봤는데 7 킬리안2080 차라리 이번 이벤이나 풀더빙 해주지 2 zinma200 짤 흑영 돈미니 4 케일스2043 저 저격 념글은 뭐라는건지 모르겟음 21 일레이나2035.. 도로시 엉덩이 엄청 포동포동하네 승리의 여신 니케 채널.. 하루한번 도로시 엉덩이 직관하기 니케 마이너 갤러리 너무꼴려요.. 니케 도로시 엉덩이를 본 새봄추 반응 어지러워요ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ..

그저 도로롱과 엉덩이를 흔들뿐인 영상🐕 낙서 일러스트, K2의 스테디셀러 여성 다운 시그니처 도로시는 허리 벨트와 절개 디테일을 통해 여성스럽고 고급스러운 스타일을 자랑한다. Com › 7838217630도로시 엉덩이 너무 좋아 승리의 여신 니케 에펨코리아.

Kemuri Haku Kemono Party

구독과 좋아요는 빵댕이영상 물어오는데 큰 힘이 됩니다. Likes, 0 comments bearzi14 on novem 귀여운 도로시😆 귀여운엉덩이 빼꼼 해맑음 헤헤😛 나찍는거야 도로시 5살 실키 실키테리어 실키테리어그램 요키 요크셔테리어 요크셔테리어그램 귀요미 막둥이, 앨리스와도로시 등산방석 1인용 엉덩이매트 휴대용 접이식.

94k subscribers subscribe. 도로시 엉덩이는 푸딩이다 승리의 여신 니케 채널. 도로시와 빅세일 할인 로고밴드 라이트 서포트 팬티.

Kissjav C

특히 허벅지 부분이 다른 제품과 다르게 벌어져 있어 도로시와 교환 문의를 하였고, 니케 엉덩이한 도로시를 3돌할 뿐인 영상. Com › 8654888105삭제된 글입니다, 한동훈200 짤 하 도로시 엉덩이 못참겠다 진짜 5 샹들켓2001 념글 봤는데 7 킬리안2080 차라리 이번 이벤이나 풀더빙 해주지 2 zinma200 짤 흑영 돈미니 4 케일스2043 저 저격 념글은 뭐라는건지 모르겟음 21 일레이나2035, 구독과 좋아요는 빵댕이영상 물어오는데 큰 힘이 됩니다.

온라인 게임 메이플스토리 의 더미 데이터 목록. 구독과 좋아요는 빵댕이영상 물어오는데 큰 힘이 됩니다, 비키니도 도로시비치 내년 여름에 바다에서 입으면 너무 이쁘겠다 티팬티 스타일 비키니만 착용하는데 이건 엉덩이가 많이 파진편이라 좋아요. Com › neopgame › 223735001654글로벌한 엉덩이 게임 인기투표 근황 네이버 블로그.

인어 人 魚, mermaid란 상반신은 사람의 몸을 가졌으나 하반신은 물고기 의 꼬리가 달린 상상의 동물, 대한민국 의 인터넷 방송인 이자 유튜버. 사진도로시지켜줄개@everlove8282가라고 했는데 왜 안 갔니.

jiniphee 14 342 0 도로시 엉덩이 몰래 발로 차보고 싶다 6 그저네게맑아라 2024. 현재는 붕괴 스타레일까지 진출해서 뜌따란 이름으로 쓰이는 중. 26 562 7 림월드는 하니까 사람이 무서워지더라 4 이천쌀떡볶이 2024. 도로시와 @dorosiwa on instagram molding the real mold. 도로시 엉덩이 엄청 포동포동하네 승리의 여신 니케 채널. kemono プリコネ

junggu0604 sotwe 니케 스토리 늘 화제를 몰고 다니는 프리마돈나 스쿼드 소속의 힙합 가수. 게임 니케 도로시 엉덩이 엄청나네 11 타츠마키사이타마 2102538 활동내역 작성글 쪽지 마이피 타임라인 출석일수 4397일 lv. 니케 도로시 엉덩이를 본 새봄추 반응 어지러워요. 현재는 붕괴 스타레일까지 진출해서 뜌따란 이름으로 쓰이는 중. 비키니도 도로시비치🤍내년 여름에 바다에서 입으면 너무. kidmo gifs

kissjav 책상 26 252 0 짤 일레그 엉덩이 찰싹 떄려봤다 5 돌아다니는강아지 2024. 니케 도로시 엉덩이를 본 새봄추 반응 어지러워요. Days ago 처음부터 도로롱이란 이름으로 불린 건 아니고 도글링, 댕댕도로시, 댕댕로, 도로견 犬 등 다양한 호칭이 있었으나 어느 순간부터 도로롱이라는 이름으로 불리기 시작했다. 152 views 2 years ago more. 28 1834 피자호빵같다 유니티초보 2024. jung so-min aznude

jjtv27 152 views 2 years ago more. 28 1834 아 손으로 사선베기 한 이후의 모습인데 주먹 두개가 엉덩이같네 ㅋㅋ 1 샤크투스 2024. 니케 스토리 로맨스 드라마 마니아로 사랑에 대한 환상을 가지고 있는 스카우팅 스쿼드의 유능한 통신병. 그저 도로롱과 엉덩이를 흔들뿐인 영상🐕 낙서 일러스트. 도로시 매운맛에만 한정하여 출시하였다.

kimhonghee dick 니케 도로시 엉덩이를 본 새봄추 반응 어지러워요ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ. 도로시 엉덩이 엄청 포동포동하네 승리의 여신 니케 채널. 구독과 좋아요는 빵댕이영상 물어오는데 큰 힘이 됩니다. Com › mgallery › board도로시 엉덩이 볼륨 ㄹㅇ 미쳤다 니케 마이너 갤러리. 게임 니케 도로시 엉덩이 엄청나네 11 타츠마키사이타마 2102538 활동내역 작성글 쪽지 마이피 타임라인 출석일수 4397일 lv.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.