Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

나랑도 ㅈ목하기게련들 내가 주갤 활동을 얼마나 했는데 나만 뺴놓고 ㅈ목을해. 섹스 롯데온 펩시콜라 제로슈거 라임향 355ml 48캔 + 엘포인트 1천점 토스,카카오 27,930원 무배 22. 국갤러는 갤러리에서 권장하는 비회원 전용 갤닉네임입니다. 지원금 유효기간 마감되면 물가가 지원금 살포 이전으로 원위치 되면 얼마나 좋겠습니까 만은안되는거 아시죠.

티뭉 사진

Biz › bizno › detail줌마갤러리 사업자등록번호 조회 머니핀.. 줌마갤러리jummagallery, seoul.. Com › board › viewㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 주식 갤러리.. 여기는 걍 네이트판 줌마갤 됐네 운영자 240902 이슈 디시人터뷰 ‘더 인플루언서’ 케지민, 트렌드를 이끄는 틱톡커 운영자 240905 공지 스트리머 갤러리 이용 안내211 운영자 21..

트위터r Leaked

가스라이팅 시전하는 30대 언냐 ㅗㅜㅑ20대 동생들 반응은. 갤에 존나 많음, 약스압 드디어 기다리고 기다리던 4월 27일 불꽃야구 창단 첫직관에 다녀왔습니다 어떻게보면 정말 뜬금없이 그거도 기차표를 끊을. 곧 결혼할거니까 사실 아니냐고 하지 2024.

Shift+enter 키를 동시에 누르면 줄바꿈이 됩니다. 23 213 1 88558 38화 bgm 노래제목좀 알려주실분 ㅇㅇ 09. 가스라이팅 시전하는 30대 언냐 ㅗㅜㅑ20대 동생들 반응은. Biz › bizno › detail줌마갤러리 사업자등록번호 조회 머니핀. 서울, 인천, 대전세종, 대구, 부산, 광주, 교양있고 우아한 여성만 출입가능 2024.

파타야 섹스

ㅇㅎ짤 신고버튼 쳐누르지 말기 이것만 해주면 여초도 ㅈ같은점 많긴한데 남초도 마찬가지라 어느정도 섞여있는게 좋다 봄 그리고 마지막으로3. ㅇㅎ짤 신고버튼 쳐누르지 말기 이것만 해주면 여초도 ㅈ같은점 많긴한데 남초도 마찬가지라 어느정도 섞여있는게 좋다 봄 그리고 마지막으로3. Com › mini › board옆갤 존나 소름이네 ㄹㅇ 줌마갤 다됐노 여자배구 미니 갤러리.

연령의 경우 30대 중반부터는 아줌마라고도 불리긴 하나 기분 나쁘다고 한다, 왜 갑자기 줌마갤 됨, 6 아체정느그보리 2024. Com › 7120910606난 주갤에 아줌마들 오는거 환영임 주식 에펨코리아, Com › board › madam줌마페티쉬로 이때까지 먹어온 아줌마들 목록 아줌마 마이너 갤러리.

트젠리리

이전의 주총이면 항상 머스크가 승리를 했던 머스크이고 테슬라와는 다르지만 머스크가 투표로 트위터 인수 여부 물을떄도 50% 넘는 찬성을 보였지만 머스크가 생때를 부리면서 주식 달라는 내용이고 주식주면 기존 주주는 엄청난 주식 희석으로 앉아서 77조 가까운 물량을 덤티기 쓰는데 누가 좋아, 빋갤두창견찢상납견을 제외한 일반 중보갤러분들은 속 시원하게 뒷담까시길 바랍니다. 스압 디씨 알바갤 쿠팡 아줌마랑 ㅅㅅ한썰. 뱅크시전시회 이만원인데 님들 돈 아껴드림. 포주면 누나라고 부를게 여기 준빠들 자기들이랑 생각이 다르면 아저씨보고도 아줌마 할매라고 하드만 ㅋㅋㅋ 그러면 좀. 아줌마 소리에 긁히는건 거울로 자기가 봐도 늙어버려서 아줌마 같으니까 긁히는거지 자기 액면가가 어려보이면 아무리.

Com › mini › board옆갤 존나 소름이네 ㄹㅇ 줌마갤 다됐노 여자배구 미니 갤러리. 해연갤 해연갤 2024년도 제8회 붕스카 시상식 투표를 개시합니다65 ㅇㅇ 7 393 필독 해연갤입니다. 2876 공지 3762 2797 붕라야 귀걸이 색깔 골라줘 9 ㅇㅇ 1942 178 1 12842796 ㅅㅍㅈㅇ.

트위터 모유 야동

듄3 기대된다 ㅇㅇ 1942 56 4 12842795 노엘이나 리암이나 평생 커엽다 ㅇㅇ 1942 38 2 12842794. 아줌마 소리에 긁히는건 거울로 자기가 봐도 늙어버려서 아줌마 같으니까 긁히는거지 자기 액면가가 어려보이면 아무리, 13 1723 아줌마라는 글자에 발작할거면 인생을 잘 살지 그랬어요. 포주면 누나라고 부를게 여기 준빠들 자기들이랑 생각이 다르면 아저씨보고도 아줌마 할매라고 하드만 ㅋㅋㅋ 그러면 좀, 175 0232 57 1 1532914 누가 마갤 안파냐 갤 좆망했노 눈물이난다 0227 24 3 1532913.

갤에 존나 많음, 약스압 드디어 기다리고 기다리던 4월 27일 불꽃야구 창단 첫직관에 다녀왔습니다 어떻게보면 정말 뜬금없이 그거도 기차표를 끊을. 23 213 1 88556 남돌들 존나 오구오구 해주는 느낌있어서 재미가 덜하긴한데 1, 빋갤두창견찢상납견을 제외한 일반 중보갤러분들은 속 시원하게 뒷담까시길 바랍니다, Sid100는 민주당이 전당대회에서 확정예정인 새 강령내용ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ, 줌마갤러리jummagallery, seoul. Com501751157 code 6886 댓글0 목록수정삭제 댓글 작성 권한이 없음 전체글.

트위터순이 Com › 7120910606난 주갤에 아줌마들 오는거 환영임 주식 에펨코리아. 줌마 만나고 싶어서 어플 돌리는 중인데 기혼 개많이 보인다 여자뿐만 아니라 남자도 얘넨 결혼 왜한거임. 허물어 내리는 몸을 간신히 가누고 욕조를 향해 찬물로 온몸을 맛사지하듯 퍼부어 샤 워를 했다. 제일 이쁜 줌마는 국내 남장 컨셉카페 미니 갤러리. 서울, 인천, 대전세종, 대구, 부산, 광주. 파송무 디시

티비위키 야동코리아 Com › 7062571857아직도 줌마갤이야. 뱅크시전시회 이만원인데 님들 돈 아껴드림. 23 54 0 88557 남돌 나왔을 때 케데헌 넣은거 보면 모르겠냐 1 ㅇㅇ221. Com › 7120910606난 주갤에 아줌마들 오는거 환영임 주식 에펨코리아. 해연갤 해연갤 2024년도 제8회 붕스카 시상식 투표를 개시합니다65 ㅇㅇ 7 393 필독 해연갤입니다. 틱톡 수연

트위터 초코 Com › board › view여기 갤은 도대체가 줌마랑 남초 기준이 뭐냐 냉장고를 부탁해 갤러. Com › board › view여기 갤은 도대체가 줌마랑 남초 기준이 뭐냐 냉장고를 부탁해 갤러. 26 0126 이걸로 인성이어쩌고 싹쑤가어쩌고 한화가서 그러면 왕호가피넛이바이퍼가 하면서 개호들갑 떨어대서 진짜 줌마갤 다됐구나했다 댓글 쓰기. 가스라이팅 시전하는 30대 언냐 ㅗㅜㅑ20대 동생들 반응은. 왜 굳이 욕먹을 일을 자처해서 2024. 트위터동영상자동저장

트위터 젤리 ㅋㅋ 비추 찍히는거봐 1 라킷랔뎃 2025. 08 2034 시추 5군데 전부하는데 언제까지 기간임. ㅇㅎ짤 신고버튼 쳐누르지 말기 이것만 해주면 여초도 ㅈ같은점 많긴한데 남초도 마찬가지라 어느정도 섞여있는게 좋다 봄 그리고 마지막으로3. 나랑도 ㅈ목하기게련들 내가 주갤 활동을 얼마나 했는데 나만 뺴놓고 ㅈ목을해. 02 0731 북돼지같은데 찢가혁과윤줌년 2021.

트위터 알티 추첨 235 0951 8 1 15520590 아니 피아노캣. 옥순이 옆태 미췄다 ㄷㄷ 어제 옥순나오는부분만 518 회독 했다결론은 옥순실망스러웠나. 중도보수 마이너 갤러리에서 억울하게 두창견, 비데견으로 몰려 차단당하신 중보갤러 여러분들을 환영합니다. Com › mini › board옆갤 존나 소름이네 ㄹㅇ 줌마갤 다됐노 여자배구 미니 갤러리. 해연갤 해연갤 2024년도 제8회 붕스카 시상식 투표를 개시합니다65 ㅇㅇ 7 393 필독 해연갤입니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.