Register for sports betting odds, top leagues, casino games, slots, scratchcards, live casino, bingo.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

합리적인 시작을 원하는 이용자에게 꼭 필요한 가이드입니다. 최소 보증금은 10달러 1mbtc이며 비트코인으로 입금을 한 플레이어의 경우 최대 1btc까지 보너스 금액이 올라갈수 있습니다. 이 경우, 카지노는 최대 0까지 플레이어의 입금액과 동일한 금액을 보너스로 제공합니다. 최대 eur 2000까지의 첫 입금 보너스 50%.

2 하이롤러를 위한 고액의 입금 보너스 5.

이는 또한 전통적인 온라인 카지노에서는 제공되지 않는 암호화폐 전용 카지노 보너스 와 같은 기능을 허용합니다. Bonuses casinoin bonuses affiliate disclosure our content contains affiliate links and we may make a commission on operator registrations and deposits made through these links. 이 보너스는 모든 플레이어들에게 제공되며 최소 보증금은 $10 또는 1mbtc에 불과합니다, 가입 방법 먼저 casinoin 첫 입금 보너스 인 웹사이트에서 계정을 등록하세요, 출금 상한 $100 200%의 첫회 입금 보너스.

이는 또한 전통적인 온라인 카지노에서는 제공되지 않는 암호화폐 전용 카지노 보너스 와 같은 기능을 허용합니다.. 보증금 없는 보너스, 무보증 보너스, 가입 꽁머니 보너스 등으로도 불리웁니다..

최대 eur 2000까지의 첫 입금 보너스 50%. 보너스 금액 233,520원의 200%인 467,040원이 베팅 보너스 계좌에 입금됩니다. 가입 전 반드시 확인해야 할 casinoin의 단점과 사용자 불만 사례를 자세히 알아보세요. Io 독점적 인 120 % 보너스와 60 번 내기없는 스핀을 받으세요, 입금 보너스는 가장 일반적으로 첫 입금자에게 제공됩니다.

필승전략베팅에서 입금, 무료 스핀, 캐시백 등 다양한 카지노 보너스 정보를 확인하고, 2025년 최고의 프로모션을 즐겨보세요. 이 보너스들은 종종 초기 잔액을 두 배로 늘려주며, 인기 슬롯에서 무료 스핀도 포함합니다. 예를 들어 첫 입금액이 233,520원이라면 200% 보너스를 받을 수 있습니다. Bc게임, 무입금 보너스+4회차 입플 보너스. 이번 목록에는 88 dragon, a night in paris, at the copa, charms and clov.

Find The Best Casinoin No Deposit Bonuses, Promo Codes, And Free Spins Coupons At Chipy.

※계정 등록시 보너스 코드 「cw777」을 입력 ※보너스액은 35달러, 적격 입금은 싱글 거래로 진행되어야 합니다, 첫 예금 금액의 100%를 보상해 주는 개념으로 이루어지며, 즉시 사용이 가능합니다. 첫 입금 보너스 카지노 보너스 파인더. 예를 들어 첫 입금액이 233,520원이라면 200% 보너스를 받을 수 있습니다.

이 프로모션을 활성화하려면 최소 7,395원을 입금해야 합니다, 해외 정식 온라인카지노 카지노인casinoin의 추천 포인트와 간단한 회원등록&입출금비트코인 등 암호화폐 방법을 알려드립니다, 즉, 기존 플레이어도 카지노로부터 입금 보너스 혜택을 받을 수 있습니다. 환영 보너스 1win 보너스 사용법, 충전, 친구 초대 보너스 등 다양한 혜택이 기다리고 있어요.

Com › Slotsite슬롯사이트 추천 순위 온라인 슬롯사이트 선택 방법.

가입 보너스는 온라인카지노에 새롭게 회원가입을 한 이용자들에게 제공되는 혜택입니다, 출금 상한 $100 200%의 첫회 입금 보너스. 최대 eur 2000까지의 첫 입금 보너스 50%, 보통 신규 회원들에게 가입 환영 보너스 형식으로 제공되거나 특별 프로모션나 vip 카지노 보너스 프로그램 의 일부로 받을 수도 있습니다, Hours ago 시작 잔액 €100 9, 하지만 암호화폐 입금자에게는 해당되지 않고, 보너스 자체의 규정도 복잡하고 어렵습니다.

보통 해외 정식 온라인카지노에서는 0원40만원의 첫입금 보너스가 제공되는 곳이 많습니다만, 카지노인 casinoin의 경우 1btc 약6,400만원의 첫입금 보너스를 지급합니다. Skwin offers exciting bonuses and promotions for new users. 1win 보너스로 시작하여, 보너스 1win 사용 방법과 1win 카지노 보너스의 혜택을 최대한 활용할수 있는 방법을 알려드리고. Casinoin 리뷰 — 신뢰하기 어려운 온라인 카지노, 주의 필요. 적격 입금은 싱글 거래로 진행되어야 합니다. 매치 보너스 입금 보너스는 플레이어가 첫 입금을 하면 입금액의 일정 비율을 매치하여 카지노 가입머니를 제공하는 형태의 보너스입니다.

We Strongly Recommend Players To Avoid Playing At This Casino And Choose Another Casino To Play At.

Com › verify › casinoincasinoin 리뷰 — 신뢰하기 어려운 온라인 카지노, 주의 필요. 첫 입금 보너스는 당연히 카지노 예금을 조건으로 합니다. 보통 해외 정식 온라인카지노에서는 0원40만원의 첫입금 보너스가 제공되는 곳이 많습니다만, 카지노인casinoin의 경우 1btc약6,400만원의 첫입금. 이는 기본 게임을 우회하고 즉시 프리 스핀을 시작하기 위해 프리미엄—보통 스테이크의 100배에서 2000배를 지불할 수 있습니다, 입금 보너스는 가장 일반적으로 첫 입금자에게 제공됩니다.

히토미 태그 검색방법 Iocasinoin top online casino slots, live casino & sportsbook. 가입 보너스는 온라인카지노에 새롭게 회원가입을 한 이용자들에게 제공되는 혜택입니다. 카지노사이트 보너스 혜택을 한눈에 정리했습니다. Iocasinoin top online casino slots, live casino & sportsbook. 예를 들어, 슬롯 게임 종류를 살펴봅시다. 히토미 피메일온리

히토미 피폐물 Hours ago 시작 잔액 €100 9. 입금 보너스는 가장 일반적으로 첫 입금자에게 제공됩니다. 환영 패키지는 두 번의 100% 입금 매치를 포함하며, 두 번의 입금을 통해 총 150개의 무료 스핀이 제공됩니다. 100% 보너스의 베팅 요구 조건은 14일 이내에 충족해야 하며, 이 기간은 자격을 갖춘 입금을 위한 30일 기간에 포함됩니다. 첫 입금 시 100% 최대 €100 보너스, 즉시 보너스 라운드, 그리고 avalon the lost kingdom에서 사용 가능한 100회 무료 스핀으로 운을 시험해 보세요. 히토미다운로더 화질

히토미 온천 최대 eur 2000까지의 첫 입금 보너스 50%. 기존 플레이어를 위한 입금 보너스 – 재충전 보너스라고. 이 보너스들은 종종 초기 잔액을 두 배로 늘려주며, 인기 슬롯에서 무료 스핀도 포함합니다. 한국 플레이어를 환영하는 최신 신규 카지노 사이트를 확인해보세요. 신규 플레이어를 위한 입금 보너스 – 이미 언급했듯이 이 보너스는 첫 입금 보너스, 환영 보너스 또는 가입 보너스라고도 합니다. 히토미 폰허브

히토미 보면 처벌 보통 첫 입금액의 100%까지 매칭되며, 최대 금액 제한이 있습니다. 첫 예금 금액의 100%를 보상해 주는 개념으로 이루어지며, 즉시 사용이 가능합니다. 보증금 없는 보너스, 무보증 보너스, 가입 꽁머니 보너스 등으로도 불리웁니다. Org › 온라인카지노의모든것온라인카지노의 모든 것 fifty two deck history. 보통 첫 입금액의 100%까지 매칭되며, 최대 금액 제한이 있습니다.

히토미 태그 조합 적격 입금은 싱글 거래로 진행되어야 합니다. 100% 보너스의 베팅 요구 조건은 14일 이내에 충족해야 하며, 이 기간은 자격을 갖춘 입금을 위한 30일 기간에 포함됩니다. We strongly recommend players to avoid playing at this casino and choose another casino to play at. 해외 정식 온라인카지노 카지노인casinoin의 추천 포인트와 간단한 회원등록&입출금비트코인 등 암호화폐 방법을 알려드립니다. 보통 해외 정식 온라인카지노에서는 0원40만원의 첫입금 보너스가 제공되는 곳이 많습니다만, 카지노인 casinoin의 경우 1btc 약6,400만원의 첫입금 보너스를 지급합니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.