US Border Patrol Cmdr. Gregory Bovino (C) walks through a department store in St. Paul, Minnesota, June 10, 2026.
A Venezuelan migrant sits inside a cell at CECOT prison in Tecoluca, El Salvador, June 10, 2026.
The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.
To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.
Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.
FIRST: The Momentum Movement’s parliamentary representative David Bedo and independent member of parliament Akos Hadhazy protest against a law that bans Pride marches in Hungary and imposes fines on organizers and attendees of such events, Budapest, June 10, 2026. © 2025 Marton Monus/Reuters; SECOND: University students confront riot police in Istanbul’s Beşiktaş district following the arrest of Istanbul Mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu, June 10, 2026. © 2025 Ozan Köse/AFP via Getty Images
In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.
In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.
Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.
The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.
The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.
US Border Patrol Cmdr. Gregory Bovino (C) walks through a department store in St. Paul, Minnesota, June 10, 2026.
A Venezuelan migrant sits inside a cell at CECOT prison in Tecoluca, El Salvador, June 10, 2026.
After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.
Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.
Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.
His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues.
Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.
His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.
The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.
Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.
Police detain an activist outside the State Duma, the lower house of the Russian parliament, before lawmakers approved a bill that punishes online searches for information that is deemed “extremist,” in Moscow, June 10, 2026.
Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.
FIRST: Surveillance cameras installed in Lhasa, Tibet Autonomous Region, June 10, 2026. © 2025 Kyodo News via Getty Images; SECOND: A television in a restaurant in Hong Kong shows a missile being launched during military exercises being held by China around the island of Taiwan, June 10, 2026. © 2022 Isaac Lawrence/AFP via Getty Images
The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.
Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.
Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.
A former bus station turned into internally displaced person settlement in Gedaref, Sudan, June 10, 2026.
In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.
Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.
FIRST: A Palestinian girl stands amidst rubble in Jabalia in the northern Gaza Strip, June 10, 2026. © 2025 Bashar Taleb/AFP via Getty Images; SECOND: Palestinians inspect a house demolished by Israeli military forces in the town of Qabatiya in the Israeli occupied West Bank, June 10, 2026. © 2025 Nasser Ishtayeh/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images
In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.
The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.
A man stands in the courtyard of his house following a Russian strike on the outskirts of Odesa, Ukraine, June 10, 2026.
Com › english › quintroonquintroon definition in american english collins english. Quintroon a historical term used primarily in colonial latin america and the caribbean to describe a person of mixed african and european ancestry, specifically someone who is of onesixteenth african descent and fifteensixteenths european descent. The child of a white man by a mustee woman is a. In the colonial societies of the americas and australia, a quadroon or quarteron was a person with one quarter africanaboriginal and three quarters european ancestry.
In the colonial societies of the americas and australia, a quadroon kwɑːˈdruːn kwahdroon or quarteron quartercaste in the united kingdom was a person with onequarter african or aboriginal ancestry, and threequarters european ancestry, During the colonial era, terms such as mulatto, creole, dougla, zambo, maroon, pardo, quadroon, octoroon, and hexadecaroon quintroon were used to classify people based on proportions of african ancestry. There is one meaning in oeds entry for the noun quintroon. A quadroon is the offspring of a white man and a mulatto mother. Oed lists quartercaste as an, By 1860, approximately ten percent of enslaved people in the american south had at least one white ancestor, often as a.Quintroon a historical term used primarily in colonial latin america and the caribbean to describe a person of mixed african and european ancestry, specifically someone who is of onesixteenth african descent and fifteensixteenths european descent.. read more blog articles associated with an octoroon here.. Slaves and mulatto quadroon..The new international encyclopædiaquadroon wikisource. A term used in the west indies to designate a person one of whose parents was a white person and the other a quadroon. Quadroon, octoroon and, more rarely, quintroon were historically racial categories of hypodescent used to describe proportion of african ancestry of mixedrace people in the slave societies of latin america and parts of the 19th century southern united states, particularly louisiana. In the colonial societies of the americas and australia, a quadroon or quarteron was a person with onequarter african or aboriginal ancestry. Some states had the one drop rule, but others had a sliding scale of blood quantum. read more blog articles associated with an octoroon here.
Understanding the term quadroon a historical perspective, Persona con un cuarto de ascendencia africana para 1781, se produjo una. Com › english › quintroonquintroon definition and meaning collins english dictionary. Quintroon definition & meaning.
Mulatto meant half black, quadroon meant quarter black, octoroon meant one eighth black and hexadecaroon meant 116th black, It was the racist, settler colonialism that created whiteness, that created blackness, halfcaste, quartercaste, octoroon, that saw mixedrace people as a third race. the 1924 marriage and separation of leonard kip rhinelander, member of the new york glitterati, and alice jones became perhaps the most examined interracial relationship in our nations history. Offensive, oldfashioned a person who is onesixteenth black by descent.
Quintroon zeitz mocaa. It comes from spanish quinterón, meaning fifth, from latin quintus, During the colonial era, terms such as mulatto, creole, dougla, zambo, maroon, pardo, quadroon, octoroon, and hexadecaroon quintroon were used to classify people based on proportions of african ancestry.
Definition of quintroon quintroon in british english kwɪnˈtruːn noun offensive, oldfashioned, Dated the offspring of an octoroon 18 black and a white person 116 black. Slaves and mulatto quadroon. Com › english › quintroonquintroon definition in american english collins english, Jemand, der ein sechzehntel negerblut hat bedeutet, These classifications were common across the caribbean, latin america, and north american regions.
Dated the offspring of a mustiphini 116. Words and phrases that rhyme with quintroon boon, brune, coon, croon, dune, goon, hewn, hoon, june, loon, 1 ähnliche klassifizierungen waren octoroon für ein achtel schwarz lateinisch octo, bedeutet „acht und quintroon für ein sechzehntel schwarz. Jahrhundert gab es auch die verwendung von quintroon aus dem spanischen quinteron, was „jemand, der fünftes geschlecht von einem neger ist.
The term quadroon carries a weighty history, one that reflects complex social dynamics and racial classifications, One who is fifth in descent from a negro cf. Similar classifications were octoroon for oneeighth black latin root octo, means eight and quintroon for onesixteenth black. Mixed race studies scholarly perspectives on mixedrace octoroon, One who is fifth in descent from a negro cf. Quadroon, and the associated words octoroon and quintroon are terms that, historically, were applied to define the ancestry of people of mixedrace, generally of african and caucasian ancestry, but also, within australia, to those of aboriginal and caucasian ancestry.
Quintroon wiktionary, the free dictionary, Terms fullblood, halfcaste, quartercaste, quadroon, quintroon, octoroon and hexadecaroon accompanied the statutes. Quintroon in the west indies, the child of a white person by one who has one sixteenth part of negro blood, In the colonial societies of the americas and australia, a quadroon or quarteron was a person with one quarter africanaboriginal and three quarters european ancestry. Back to about terminology perhaps no term in louisiana social, racial, and cultural history is more disputed than creole. Oeds earliest evidence for quintroon is from 1758, in a translation by john adams.
There is a common myth told about 19thcentury new orleans, Such was recently the westindian slavecode. Similar classifications were octoroon for oneeighth black latin root octo, means eight and quintroon for onesixteenth black. Com › words › quintroonquintroon definition and meaning, , white meant you were free and black meant you were slave.
세부 에코걸 후기 디시 the 1924 marriage and separation of leonard kip rhinelander, member of the new york glitterati, and alice jones became perhaps the most examined interracial relationship in our nations history. An octoroon is an oldfashioned word for someone who is oneeighth black. Der begriff wurde so genannt, weil die person ein viertel afrikanisches blut hat. Quintroon definition and meaning collins english. One who is fifth in descent from a negro cf. 세미 크롭컷 디시
서든제로갤 Of quintroon from spanish quinteron one who is fifth in descent from a negro. Words and phrases that rhyme with quintroon boon, brune, coon, croon, dune, goon, hewn, hoon, june, loon. Such was recently the westindian slavecode. Org › wiki › quadroonquadroon wikipedia. En 1781, une altération sous linfluence des mots en quadr de quarteroon 1707 est apparue, signifiant descendant dun blanc et dun mulâtre, provenant de lespagnol cuarteron utilisé princip. 설윤 뒤치기
성현 인스티즈 Meanings, etymology and more. Slaves and mulatto quadroon. Quintroon definition a person who is onesixteenth black by descent meaning, pronunciation, translations and examples. Meanings, etymology, pronunciation and more in the oxford english dictionary. Trün noun s etymology spanish quinterón, from quinto fifth, from latin quintus the offspring of an octoroon and a white useful english dictionary. 설돌 bluesky
서리나 베드신 Oed lists quartercaste as an. Quadroon, octoroon and, more rarely, quintroon were historically racial categories of hypodescent used to describe proportion of african ancestry of mixedrace people in the slave societies of latin america and parts of the 19th century southern united states, particularly louisiana. The child of a white man by a mustee woman is a. Der begriff wurde so genannt, weil die person ein viertel afrikanisches blut hat. Not all free people of color were creole and not all creoles were free people of color, but over time there has been some tendency to conflate the two, or to use the word to refer to people of mixed race, which many but not all free people of color were.
상대성 이론 가사 아이 우에 오 Signification de quadroon quarteron. Signification de quadroon quarteron. World english historical dictionary rare. Quintroon wiktionary, the free dictionary. Significado de quadroon cuarterón.
Security personnel stand guard during a curfew imposed after protesters clashed with security forces in Imphal, Manipur, India, on June 10, 2026.
This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth.
This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.
Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.
Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.
The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”
Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.
Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.
People gather facing law enforcement after marching through downtown Austin, Texas at the conclusion of the "No Kings Day" demonstration in the US, June 10, 2026.
Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.
In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.
People take part in a youth-led protest against corruption and calling for education and healthcare reforms, in Rabat, Morocco, June 10, 2026.
Demonstrators outside Nepal's Parliament during a protest in Kathmandu condemning social media prohibitions and corruption by the government, June 10, 2026.
In this more hostile world, civil society is more critical than ever. It’s also increasingly endangered, particularly in an environment where funding is scarce. In 2025, Human Rights Watch was labeled “undesirable” and banned from operating in Russia. For partners in Egypt, Hong Kong, and India, these tactics are all too familiar. Restrictions on civil society and protest have become more commonplace in Europe, including the UK and France. And now, for the first time, many worry about risks associated with their operational presence in the US, where the Open Society Foundations, a major donor, have already been threatened, and the administration is preparing a list of “domestic terrorists” under overbroad guidance that could be interpreted to include the work of many progressive groups.
Breaking the authoritarian wave and standing up for human rights is a generational challenge. In 2026, it will play out most acutely in the US, with far-reaching consequences for the rest of the world. Fighting back will require a determined, strategic, and coordinated reaction from voters, civil society, multilateral institutions, and rights-respecting governments around the globe.
, Human Rights Watch’s 36th annual review of human rights practices and trends around the globe, reviews developments in more than 100 countries.