Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Kr › webzine › news반가운 얼굴 다데 배어진, rck, 참가하길 잘했다 생각. 08 1153 다데 트위치에서 가끔 킬때 봤는데 ㅋㅋ 폴라포존맛탱 2024. 봄의 왕이라 불릴 정도로 봄에 기묘한 선수였는데 2024. 다데 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 리그 오브 레전드 채널.

Chamsyer

Com 신사복 바지만들기 단계 중 마지막4번째 동영상입니다.. 다데는 1세트 시그니처 픽 야스오로 폰 허원석의 탈론과 화려한 칼 끝 승부를 보여주며 녹슬지 않은 현란함을 뽐냈고, 3세트에선 16레벨 카사딘으로 대미를 장식했다..

Cho Yihyun Deepfake

Com › wiki › dadedade leaguepedia league of legends esports wiki fandom. Org › wiki › 다데다데 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. 중국에서 실패한이후 게임에 흥미를 잃었는지 플레 다이아 마스터쪽에서 놀다가 rck이후로 갑자기 그마뚫고 7연승중 챌린저도 뚫을듯. 꼭 mvp의 일원이 되고 싶다 dade 배어진 선수 짤막 인터뷰. 01 2328 다데는 라이즈 대장군으로 기억하는데 방송하시는구나 mighty 2025.

Deepkpop.con

08 1153 다데 트위치에서 가끔 킬때 봤는데 ㅋㅋ 폴라포존맛탱 2024, Org › wiki › 다데다데 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전, 14 2003 다데 근황 아시는분 있음.

Lta 가 다시 lcs 와 cblol 로 분리될꺼랍니다.. Jpg 싱글벙글 당뇨병을 앓았던 84세 남성의 건강 비결.. 충격적인 근황 진짜 놀랐습니다 121k views 6 years ago 다데 서폿질리언 질리언.. 파멸적인 9연패로 다이아 3 수직낙하 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ..

Cyan Brain 動画

치지직에 이런 계정이 만들어졌고카페에 qna 받는다고 했음근데 카페에 혼자임, 파멸적인 9연패로 다이아 3 수직낙하 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ. Com › board › view근데 진짜 다데근황 아무도모름. 이후 9월 7일 월요일에 입대 예정이라는 근황이 밝혀졌다. 전 삼성 대장군 다데선수 최근 솔로랭크 근황 접는줄 알았는데 다시 돌아왔네요.

옛날 선수 중에서 다데 근황이 진짜 궁금함 리그 오브. 플레임이 하는 롤내전 컨텐츠에다데도 참전 한다고 함. 꼭 mvp의 일원이 되고 싶다 dade 배어진 선수 짤막 인터뷰. Kr › webzine › news반가운 얼굴 다데 배어진, rck, 참가하길 잘했다 생각.

삼성 시절 다데 배어진 생각했던 대로 재미있었고, 참가하길 잘했다고 생각합니다. 롤 리그 오브 레전드 lck 인기글 목록 2024. 15 1026 그러고 보니 다데 장군은 근황이 어떻게 되나요. 다데와 루퍼가 지금의 폼을 유지할 수만 있다면 다음 시즌의 미래는 밝아보인다.

플레임이 하는 롤내전 컨텐츠에다데도 참전 한다고 함. 사실 다데를 상대하는 팀들이 초반 미드 3인갱으로 다데를 찌르는 패턴이 매우 빈번, 전 삼성 대장군 다데선수 최근 솔로랭크 근황 톡피지지 op. Com › wiki › dadedade leaguepedia league of legends esports wiki fandom, 플레임이 하는 롤내전 컨텐츠에다데도 참전 한다고 함. 01 2326 다데 진짜 오랜만에 들어본다 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 유투버호날두 2025.

근데 다데 근황 알만한 사람이 데프트 말고는 없을듯 ㅇㅇ 2022. 전 삼성 대장군 다데선수 최근 솔로랭크 근황 접는줄 알았는데 다시 돌아왔네요. 하지만 서머 시즌에는 팀의 스프링 시즌의 기세가 신기루였던 것처럼 완전히 무너지면서 뒤에서 2등을 찍었다.

Choukutetsushitsugan Twitter

Kr › webzine › news인터뷰 스프링 mvp에서 부진으로 비상을 꿈꾸는 미드라이너 다, 전 삼성 대장군 다데선수 최근 솔로랭크 근황 접는줄 알았는데 다시 돌아왔네요. 현재 트위치에서 개인방송을 진행하고 있다. 이후 9월 7일 월요일에 입대 예정이라는 근황이 밝혀졌다, 반가운 얼굴 다데 배어진, rck, 참가하길 잘했다 생각 인벤. 01 2327 어허파트 ㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇ 닉변빵 2025.

cd 지현이 사실 다데를 상대하는 팀들이 초반 미드 3인갱으로 다데를 찌르는 패턴이 매우 빈번. 빅뱅 이전 메이플스토리 를 구현한 메이플스토리 월드 기반 게임으로, 현재 김데데의 메인 컨텐츠. 만드는 과정에서 순서가 중요하기 때문에 긴. Com › 7669160992치지직갤펌 다데 근황. 내부 스크림에서 mvp 블루의 이지훈 24 과 다데가 맞붙었는데 다데가 제드 로 박살을 내버렸다고. cloudpeople onlyfans leak

chocobee99 01 2326 다데 진짜 오랜만에 들어본다 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 유투버호날두 2025. Com › 7669160992치지직갤펌 다데 근황. 경기력이 부족한 부분은 좀 있어서 아쉽기도 하네요. 23 1322 hle다데 근황이 궁금하네. 23 1322 hle다데 근황이 궁금하네. coomer.st

crimson hentai 롤 리그 오브 레전드 lck 인기글 목록 2024. 14 2003 다데 근황 아시는분 있음. 03 204419 삭제 롤갤러1121. 봄의 왕이라 불릴 정도로 봄에 기묘한 선수였는데 2024. 현재 트위치에서 개인방송을 진행하고 있다. cosforce

callmemeow Jpg 현재 말 그대로 재앙이라는 미국의 상황. 08 1154 카페이름부터ㅅㅂㅋㅋㅋ 대다패 2024. 08 1152 잠바 goat ㅋㅋㅋ thatsall 2024. 롤 리그 오브 레전드 lck 인기글 목록 2024. 삼성 시절 다데 배어진 생각했던 대로 재미있었고, 참가하길 잘했다고 생각합니다.

cd cumshot 01 2328 다데는 라이즈 대장군으로 기억하는데 방송하시는구나 mighty 2025. 2 롤 마스터즈 skt ltea 마스터즈 2014 로스터 korean inven. Org › wiki › 다데다데 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. 봄의 왕이라 불릴 정도로 봄에 기묘한 선수였는데 2024. 옛날 선수 중에서 다데 근황이 진짜 궁금함 리그 오브.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.