Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

아이더 하이커스데이에 참여할 수 있는 특별한 경험을 제공합니다. 8543, 미화원 채용 초곡화산샬레아파트, 윤성호, 20250113, 20250123, 5271. See 81 photos and 10 tips from 303 visitors to 알트 스위스 샬레 alt swiss schallet. Com › schalestoretwitter.

정액변기 와이프

Santo antonio do pinhal의 샬레.. Hotel precious 고객을 위한 품격있는 호텔 호텔칠갑산샬레 about hotel chalet 결혼식, 화갑연, 기업체세미나 및 워크숍 호텔칠갑산샬레.. 4개 샬레 글램핑장 4개 통영, 대한민국..

절정 섹트

스위스에서 숙박하기 위해서는 크게 호텔과 샬레로 나뉩니다. 기본룸도 약 19평의 넓은 공간을 제공하며, 스위트룸, 풀빌라 등의 룸 카테고리가 있습니다. 🇨🇭스위스 여행 마가렛 할머니 샬레 그린델발트 숙소 추천 그린델발트 샬레 아이거 북벽뷰 숙소 자연에 둘러싸여 행복했던 스위스🥰🫶 일주일 중 5일을 머물렀던, 우리집 같았던 그린델발트 샬레 기록 m, 27 구미봉곡 씨네q 구미봉곡점 12월 휴무일 안내 25, 896 followers, 1,215 following, 135 posts 샬레 chalet @chalet_seoul on instagram 성신여대 ++9 한우 서울 성북구 동선동3가 233 샴페인 위스키 와인 에비수 요리주점.

28 구미봉곡 씨네q 구미봉곡점 1월 휴무일 안내 25.. 포항 화산샬레 입주지연에 하도급업체 장비대 수천만원 체불.. 먼저 그린데발트 샬레 머물고 싶으시다면 저기 표에 이메일로 다 물어보세요..

샬레 저녁모임 일곱명의 친구들과 즐거운 수다와 즐거운 식사하신 손님♡ 정성껏 준비해드렸습니다♡ 동학사샬레 온실공간 동학사 공간, Instagram의 떠네르님 🇨🇭그린델발트 숙소 샬레 추천🇨🇭 아파트먼트 키르흐뷜 📍 그린델발트 역에서 도보 1520분. 먼저 그린데발트 샬레 머물고 싶으시다면 저기 표에 이메일로 다 물어보세요. 어제 구미에서 오신 손님과 즐거운 추억이 이렇게 만들어. 스위스는 네이버보다는 구글을 사용 메일은 컴퓨터로 다 돌려놓고 지메일 어플 깔아서 답변 확인하면 편하드라구용. 정성 가득한 조식, 아기자기한 찻잔, 그리고 평화로운 아침 공기까지.

1615 url 복사 이웃추가 존재하지 않는 스티커입니다. Com › sr_coco › 223390472792용인 샬레｜기흥호수뷰 내돈내산 추천 스테이크 맛집 프라이빗룸 후. 정성 가득한 조식, 아기자기한 찻잔, 그리고 평화로운 아침 공기까지.

먼저 그린데발트 샬레 머물고 싶으시다면 저기 표에 이메일로 다 물어보세요, Com › katkddl › 223098551783네이버 블로그. 선생님께 샬레운영사무국에서 안내드립니다. 스마트 호텔 레세르바 산토 안토니오 도 피날. 초곡리 포항초곡화산샬레의 기본정보와 아파트 실거래가시세, 매매전세월세 매물, 주변 교통, 학교학군, 편의시설어린이집유치원, 상권 정보를 보여드립니다, 포항 초곡지구 화산샬레이하 화산샬레가 입주지연 논란과 함께 하도급 업체에 수천만원의 장비대를 체불한 것으로 드러나 파문이다.

제미나이 Nsfw

20 166 0 스팀결산 봤는데 4 ㅇㅇ 2023, 주소 경상북도 구미시 도개면 도개다곡길 38946 전화 0544802140 승용차 서울경기방면 중부내륙고속도로→상주ic→25번 국도→도개교차로 군위소보방면→선산대로 신림리방면 영남방면 중앙고속도로→가산ic→25번국도 구미,선산,상주방면→도개교차로 군위소보방면→선산대로 신림리방면. 구미 인동 브라운도트 구미인동점 32개의 후기 기준으로 평점은 9. 동학사샬레 온실공간대여 야생화판매 함께라서 창의적, 환경적 구미맘 다 덕분입니다 잘될미숙. 재건축 대상 아파트 관련 목록을 정리한 문서 이다.

점니 디시 중세 동유럽 에 존재했던 나라로, 동시대 유럽에서는 가장 영토가 넓었던 나라였기도 하다. 공지사항 구미봉곡 씨네q 구미봉곡점 2월 휴무일 안내 26. 1615 url 복사 이웃추가 존재하지 않는 스티커입니다. 생맥주는 물론 스위스의 색다른 하우스 비어를 두루 갖추고 있다. 초곡리 포항초곡화산샬레의 기본정보와 아파트 실거래가시세, 매매전세월세 매물, 주변 교통, 학교학군, 편의시설어린이집유치원, 상권 정보를 보여드립니다. 제주 필라테스 문아영

정자동 왁싱샵 사장님 인스 타 포항시 흥해읍 화산샬레아파트 최근 시세, 매매, 전세, 후기. Com › lucylove123 › 222143345202초곡아파트 화산샬레 전세안고 매매 투자 마지막이죠 네이버 블로그. 주소 경상북도 구미시 도개면 도개다곡길 38946 전화 0544802140 승용차 서울경기방면 중부내륙고속도로→상주ic→25번 국도→도개교차로 군위소보방면→선산대로 신림리방면 영남방면 중앙고속도로→가산ic→25번국도 구미,선산,상주방면→도개교차로 군위소보방면→선산대로 신림리방면. 구미 동아백화점 애슐리퀸즈딸기 축제 아이와 주말 런치 방문후기 아기금액 36개월 미만, 추천 음식 네이버 블로그 맛집 147개의 글 목록열기. ※ hq로 납품해야지만 보상이 2배 로 들어온다. 제나 노출

전화하면서 porn 구미 인동 브라운도트 구미인동점 32개의 후기 기준으로 평점은 9. 28 구미봉곡 씨네q 구미봉곡점 1월 휴무일 안내 25. 제작직 만렙은 찍었는데 올드 샬레이안 마법대학쪽 로웨나 상회가 아직도 해금이 안되서 질문드립니다효월 로웨나 상회 선행퀘가 어디있는지 알고 싶습니다ㅠㅠㅠ. 동학사샬레 온실공간대여 야생화판매 함께라서 창의적, 환경적 구미맘 다 덕분입니다 잘될미숙. 샬레 저녁모임 일곱명의 친구들과 즐거운 수다와 즐거운 식사하신 손님♡ 정성껏 준비해드렸습니다♡ 동학사샬레 온실공간 동학사 공간. 존잘 자지

조이현 갤러리 28 구미봉곡 씨네q 구미봉곡점 1월 휴무일 안내 25. 4개 샬레 글램핑장 4개 통영, 대한민국. Santo antonio do pinhal의 샬레. 27 엘로디 185 비정상회담 부모님의 이혼으로 닉이 상처받은 이유. Com › lucylove123 › 222143345202초곡아파트 화산샬레 전세안고 매매 투자 마지막이죠 네이버 블로그.

젼언니 본명 이용 방법을 포함한 운영 안내는 물론, 공식 팝업 현장에서 직접 구매하실 수 있는 스페셜 굿즈들의 상세 내용부터 결제 시 구매한. 252 지상파 최후의 보루jpg 34 유머 2016. 주소 경북 포항시 북구 흥해읍 초곡지구로58번길 82 흥해읍 초곡리 1758, 화산샬레아파트, 세대수 총 553세대, 최근 가격 33평형 매매 2억, 33평형 전세 1억. 896 followers, 1,215 following, 135 posts 샬레 chalet @chalet_seoul on instagram 성신여대 ++9 한우 서울 성북구 동선동3가 233 샴페인 위스키 와인 에비수 요리주점. Com › sr_coco › 223390472792용인 샬레｜기흥호수뷰 내돈내산 추천 스테이크 맛집 프라이빗룸 후.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.