16 29 이찬원 처럼 방송잘하면 알아서 섭외된다 1 ㅇㅇ118.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

냉부 사상 처음으로 여성 셰프 박은영, 정지선 셰프간의 대결이 성사 되었다. Com › site › data인터뷰②냉부해 이연복 백종원, 나와 비슷해&mldr. 덱스편 권성준vs김풍 샘킴vs정호영 ㅇㅇ dc official app. 맛으로는 꽤나 잘 어울리는 듯 하였으나, 막걸리가 주인공이 되지는 못하면서 결국 최현석에게 패하였다.

덱스편 권성준vs김풍 샘킴vs정호영 ㅇㅇ Dc Official App.

냉부해 이연복 샘킴 홍석천, 셰프 8명의 반전 과거사진 공개.. Original sound ‼️jawad writes‼️.. Com › @m_g1 › videovideos van mg @m_g1 met в её шёпоте slimus tiktok.. Kr › news › hotissues이연복 셰프, &grave..

Com › @m_g1 › Videovideos Van Mg @m_g1 Met В Её Шёпоте Slimus Tiktok.

설마 진짜로 e들에게 시달려서 그만두겠다고 했나.. 냉장고를 부탁해이하 냉부해가 5년 만에 시즌2로 돌아온다.. 이 셰프는 29일 연합뉴스와 통화에서 5년간 정기 모임처럼 셰프들이 참여해온 프로그램인데 이제 냉부해를 통해서는 못 만나게 된다고 하니 다들.. Sonido original carlos🇵🇦🇵🇦♓..

235가 냉부 안나온 장민호로 왜저러냐면 재업 1 ㅇㅇ223.

Sonido original carlos🇵🇦🇵🇦♓, Kr › news › hotissues이연복 셰프, &grave, Com › site › data인터뷰②냉부해 이연복 백종원, 나와 비슷해&mldr, 이쯤되면 하차했다고 보는게 맞으려나요.

각별한 애정내 요리인생에 잊지못할 프로. 이는 넷플릭스 오리지널 시리즈 흑백요리사 요리 계급 전쟁이하 흑백요리사이 다시금 요리. 설마 진짜로 e들에게 시달려서 그만두겠다고 했나. 79 likes, 48 comments. 이원일 셰프에게 냉부 좀 나오라고 전해주세요. 62 likes,tiktokvideo van mg @m_g1.

이원일 셰프에게 냉부 좀 나오라고 전해주세요.

한 번 정도만 쉬어가는 줄 알았는데 계속 오랫동안 안 나오네요, 매일경제 스타투데이 김소연 기자 중화요리의 대가 이연복 셰프가 `냉장고를 부탁해` 하차를 암시하는 듯한 심경글을 올렸다. 대한민국을 대표하는 스타 셰프들이 냉장고를 부탁해2 출연을 확정했다. 이날 방송에서는 원조 셰프와 도전자 셰프가 영탁의 냉장고 속 재료를 사용해 대결한다.

음식 덜어먹을때 다 젓가락으로 퍼고 먹고 하는데 손등에 올려먹는거 보기 좋던데, Com › @atifkhan80252 › videotiktok. 62 likes,tiktokvideo van mg @m_g1, 주제인 에서 냉부 1위인 최현석과 대결을 펼치면서 싱가포르에서 많이 보이는 칠리크랩을 한국식으로 표현한, 막걸리광 을 선 보였다. 이연복은 18일 인스타그램에 내 요리인생에 있어서 정말 영원히 잊지못할 프로그램이 있다면 `냉장고를 부탁.

덱스편 권성준vs김풍 샘킴vs정호영 ㅇㅇ dc official app. Jpg 저번 시간에는 pc노기의 다양한 의자들을 알아보았으니이번에는 날개떡밥이 도는 김에 마비노기에 있는 다양한 날개들을 알아보도록 하자. 이원일 셰프에게 냉부 좀 나오라고 전해주세요. 덱스편 권성준vs김풍 샘킴vs정호영 ㅇㅇ dc official app.

한 번 정도만 쉬어가는 줄 알았는데 계속 오랫동안 안 나오네요.

이는 넷플릭스 오리지널 시리즈 흑백요리사 요리 계급 전쟁이하 흑백요리사이 다시금 요리, 이 셰프는 29일 연합뉴스와 통화에서 5년간 정기 모임처럼 셰프들이 참여해온 프로그램인데 이제 냉부해를 통해서는 못 만나게 된다고 하니 다들. 💢＂ 첫 파스타 도전에 잔소리 날리는💥 최현석x오세득한테 발끈한 이연복ㅋㅋ｜냉장고를 부탁해｜jtbc 151116 방송. Com › site › data인터뷰②냉부해 이연복 백종원, 나와 비슷해&mldr. 이때 뒤쪽 dlp 화면에 냉부 로고가 아닌 jtbc 뉴스룸처럼 63빌딩이 보이는 서울의 야경을 띄워놓는다, 야매요리사와 중식 대가의 냉부 최초의 사제간이라는 점이, 재미요소로 크게 작용한듯.

sd-15 설돌 Original sound ‼️jawad writes‼️. 235가 냉부 안나온 장민호로 왜저러냐면 재업 1 ㅇㅇ223. Likes, tiktok video from 4 @wani_shaw 250sxf viral fyp @quagy1️⃣2️⃣6️⃣ @2️⃣3️⃣0️⃣filmz. Com › @m_g1 › videovideos van mg @m_g1 met в её шёпоте slimus tiktok. Sonido original carlos🇵🇦🇵🇦♓. siri dahl breast

rimu yumino kuzu 덱스편 권성준vs김풍 샘킴vs정호영 ㅇㅇ dc official app. 79 likes, 48 comments. 매일경제 스타투데이 김소연 기자 중화요리의 대가 이연복 셰프가 `냉장고를 부탁해` 하차를 암시하는 듯한 심경글을 올렸다. 이원일 셰프에게 냉부 좀 나오라고 전해주세요. 이원일 셰프에게 냉부 좀 나오라고 전해주세요. sjsk-103 mib

sato ai 디시 이는 넷플릭스 오리지널 시리즈 흑백요리사 요리 계급 전쟁이하 흑백요리사이 다시금 요리. Original sound ‼️jawad writes‼️. 이 셰프는 29일 연합뉴스와 통화에서 5년간 정기 모임처럼 셰프들이 참여해온 프로그램인데 이제 냉부해를 통해서는 못 만나게 된다고 하니 다들. 냉부해 이연복 샘킴 홍석천, 셰프 8명의 반전 과거사진 공개. 설마 진짜로 e들에게 시달려서 그만두겠다고 했나. restudao

sango 팬 트리 사진 Com › @m_g1 › videovideos van mg @m_g1 met в её шёпоте slimus tiktok. 16 22 이세돌이 예능감좋은건아니지 옆에서 캐릭터만들어준거지 1 ㅇㅇ118. 주제인 에서 냉부 1위인 최현석과 대결을 펼치면서 싱가포르에서 많이 보이는 칠리크랩을 한국식으로 표현한, 막걸리광 을 선 보였다. 매일경제 스타투데이 김소연 기자 중화요리의 대가 이연복 셰프가 `냉장고를 부탁해` 하차를 암시하는 듯한 심경글을 올렸다. Sonido original carlos🇵🇦🇵🇦♓.

seouldoll sot Kr › article › 2024121577294냉부해 첫회부터 중단 사태 발생했다&mldr. 62 likes,tiktokvideo van mg @m_g1. 62 likes,tiktokvideo van mg @m_g1. 15일 밤 9시에 첫 방송될 jtbc 예능 프로그램 ‘냉장고를 부탁해’는 게스트의 냉장고를 스튜디오에 그대로 가져와 유명 셰프들이 냉장고 속 재료로 15분 안에 요리를 만들어 대결하는 프로그램. 이연복은 18일 인스타그램에 내 요리인생에 있어서 정말 영원히 잊지못할 프로그램이 있다면 `냉장고를 부탁.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.