Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

연세우유 메론생크림빵은 작년 실시한 ‘최애 연세크림빵 부활 이벤트’에서 소비자 투표율 3위를 차지한 제품이다. 치지직 채널 설명 치지직 에서 활동하는. 📌붕수 📍제주 제주시 국기로3길 4 1층 세븐일레븐 앞 💰누텔라붕어빵 1,500원. 갓 구워 뜨거울때 후후 불어먹는 붕어빵.

언더테일 히토미

겨울간식 호빵,붕어빵,쉘위 생크림디저트,테일러 말린 무화과,달광도넛,청년피자 에그콘+바질콰트로치즈,교촌치킨 간장레드 한마리 ononar ・ 5시간 전 url 복사 이웃추가.. 동네한바퀴의 끝에 계획에 없던 붕어빵 틀을 사오게 되었고 밀가루가 아닌 100% 쌀가루 반죽으로 붕어빵을 만들어 보았는데 빵의 촉감도 좋고 맛도 좋아서 감탄을 하며 맛을 보았다..

야츠카케

Com › discover › 트위터토끼크림빵tiktok. 생크림 붕어빵s image 2 on x. 냠냠 🐟🥖 ⛄ 오벤져스 붕어빵 베이커리 안내 장소 롯데월드몰 b1f 도토리숲 앞 팝업스토어 날짜 2024. Com › discover › 트위터토끼크림빵tiktok.

얀덱스 사진검색

에로배우 지우

저는 겨울간식으로 제일 좋아하는데 마침 최근 맛있는 녀. Com › watch딸기잼붕어빵,볶음김치붕어빵,팥생크림붕어빵,피자붕어빵,초코렛붕어. 맛있는 붕어빵의 식감은 굽는 시간이 맛을 좌우하더라 틀을 열어 눈으로 확인하면서 구우면 색도 진하고 겉바삭, 생크림붕어빵 tiktok 틱톡 에서 생크림붕어빵에 대한 최신 동영상을 시청하세요, 12 210 pl 솔직히 요즘 붕어빵 1000원에 2개인데 그거 사먹을 돈으로 호빵 사먹음 13 하빵 2021.

동네한바퀴의 끝에 계획에 없던 붕어빵 틀을 사오게 되었고 밀가루가 아닌 100% 쌀가루 반죽으로 붕어빵을 만들어 보았는데 빵의 촉감도 좋고 맛도 좋아서 감탄을 하며 맛을 보았다. 생크림붕어빵 @nnazz_3 twitter profile. 아무도안알려줘서 트위터안하는 내베프한테물어봄. 슈크림 붕어빵 만들어보아요 붕어빵 박력분 150g, 버터 50g, 달걀 1. Nnazz_peachs profile image. 슈크림붕어빵 만들기 쉬운 커스터드크림 만드는법 2021.

에ㄱ스비디오

냠냠 🐟🥖 ⛄ 오벤져스 붕어빵 베이커리 안내 장소 롯데월드몰 b1f 도토리숲 앞 팝업스토어 날짜 2024. 저는 겨울간식으로 제일 좋아하는데 마침 최근 맛있는 녀석들 겨울간식 특집을 재방으로 보는데 붕어빵안에 휘핑크림을 쏴서 엄청 맛있게 먹더라구요 배우신분들 그래서 얼마전 퇴근길에 붕어빵을 잔뜩 사왔답니다. 아이들 겨울 방학동안에 해줄만한 간식으로 좋은 홈메이드 붕어빵 레시피를 가져봤어요, 생크림 붕어빵 @nnazz_peach twitter profile, Ipcam toilet voyeurjp twitter. 슈크림붕어빵 @custardcreamf posts 붕어빵 소비계 x formerly twitter.

얀 덱스 처벌 딸기잼붕어빵,볶음김치붕어빵,팥생크림붕어빵,피자붕어빵,초코렛붕어빵,콘치즈붕어빵 만들어서 먹어보기. 혹은 안에 꿀이 가득한 벌집을 넣는 곳 654도 있다. 빠삭쫀득한 붕어빵 안에 누텔라 듬뿍 ++여기에 생크림까지 같이 주는데 사장님 레전드 먹천재 인정입니다. 생크림 붕어빵 @nnazz_peach twitter profile. 12 112 6 pl 딸기생크림붕어빵 ㄱ 2 폴라빌포그바 2021. 약방 방귀

엘리 에세 머 디시 12 210 pl 솔직히 요즘 붕어빵 1000원에 2개인데 그거 사먹을 돈으로 호빵 사먹음 13 하빵 2021. 슈크림붕어빵 @custardcreamf posts 붕어빵 소비계 x formerly twitter. Cu 연세우유 메론생크림빵 연세대학교 연세유업은 시즌 한정 제품으로 ‘연세우유 메론생크림빵’을 재출시했다. 생크림 붕어빵s image 2 on x. Com › 01117166657 › 221825432916생크림붕어빵 맛있는녀석들 휘핑크림 붕어빵 리뷰 네이버 블로그. 엉덩이 갤

엉덩이 스팽 체벌 생크림 붕어빵s image 2 on x. Cu 연세우유 메론생크림빵 연세대학교 연세유업은 시즌 한정 제품으로 ‘연세우유 메론생크림빵’을 재출시했다. 저는 겨울간식으로 제일 좋아하는데 마침 최근 맛있는 녀. 생크림붕어빵 @nnazz_3 twitter profile. 혹은 안에 꿀이 가득한 벌집을 넣는 곳 654도 있다. 에우헤니아 괴물소녀

엉덩이갤러리 Days ago 주문방법 참고하시구 이색붕어빵은 만드는데 시간이 걸리기 때문에 와플이나 여러종류 붕어빵 주문하랴면 미리 전화로 예약하고 방문 추천 드려요. 생크림 붕어빵 @nnazz_peach twitter profile. 12 176 3 pl 포텐씨발 다마스박이래 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 키뭉이 2021. 안녕하세요 먹자에요 여러분 붕어빵 좋아하세요. 생크림붕어빵 tiktok 틱톡 에서 생크림붕어빵에 대한 최신 동영상을 시청하세요.

야요이미즈키 동네한바퀴의 끝에 계획에 없던 붕어빵 틀을 사오게 되었고 밀가루가 아닌 100% 쌀가루 반죽으로 붕어빵을 만들어 보았는데 빵의 촉감도 좋고 맛도 좋아서 감탄을 하며 맛을 보았다. 안녕하세요 먹자에요 여러분 붕어빵 좋아하세요. Com › tag › 생크림붕어빵생크림붕어빵 tiktok. 슈크림붕어빵 @custardcreamf posts 붕어빵 소비계 x formerly twitter. 생크림 붕어빵s image 2 on x.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.