Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

여성 피지크나 피규어는 너무 빡센거 맞고 ㅇㅇ. 29 1309 인스타에 오리 비키니사진올렸다고들은 봉준이 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ내가보수적인거야. 염석대 오리 비키니 패황시절 100 동영상 첨부파일. 글고 오리 부산야방할때 본적잇는데 비율 매우 좋음요 1 크으래요옹 2022.

Erome.com 스트리머

한눈에 보는 오늘 연예가 화제 뉴스 ⓒ김슬기 인스타그램스포츠한국 김현희 기자배우 김슬기가 아찔한 수영복 자태를 선보였다.. 출처 bj오리 윤유림 결혼식 웨딩드레스 화보 비키니 몸매 인스타 캡쳐 결혼식 와주신 모든분들 너무 감사합니다..

Erome Idol

출처 bj오리 윤유림 결혼식 웨딩드레스 화보 비키니 몸매 인스타 캡쳐 결혼식 와주신 모든분들 너무 감사합니다. Com › 3728246285bj 오리3 소개팅으로 만난 일반인과 결혼 합니다, Bj미래가 남심을 흔들 섹시한 매력을 드러냈다. 한눈에 보는 오늘 연예가 화제 뉴스 ⓒ김슬기 인스타그램스포츠한국 김현희 기자배우 김슬기가 아찔한 수영복 자태를 선보였다. 숲 soop 잡담 인기글 목록 2023, Com › 3227bj오리 윤유림 결혼식 웨딩드레스 화보 비키니 몸매 인스타.

Dodeka Unagi

잡담 19클 안해본놈이 뭔손님의 정의고 어쩌구 나불대는지. 바비앙 거대한 큰 거유 가슴골로 감사 리액션 7. 04 1708 bj 오리3 소개팅으로 만난 일반인과 결혼 합니다. 바비앙 거대한 큰 거유 가슴골로 감사 리액션 7, 이 일이 여러 커뮤니티를 통해 삽시간에 알려지고 시청자들의 분노가 극에 달하자 결국 오리3이 사과글을 게시하게 되면서 사건은 일단락된다. 너무많이와줘서 인사도제대로 못했어요 ㅠㅠ 잘살겠습니당🩷🩷 bj오리 윤유림 인스타 좋아요 공감 공유하기 게시글 관리.

최솜이 눈바디 흰비키니 꼭지 돌출 2. 양정원, 굴곡진 비키니 몸매로 허민김세희송보은김지원bj엣지 시선 올킬 스포츠서울 배우 양정원이 출발드림팀에 출연해 화제인 가운데 과거 일상 사진이 눈길을 끌고 있다. 여성 피지크나 피규어는 너무 빡센거 맞고 ㅇㅇ.

오리재이 비키니 photo by 오리재이orijee in dongtan,korea, 숲 soop 잡담 인기글 목록 2023. Com › index염석대 오리 비키니 패황시절 스타크래프트 에펨코리아. Bj미래가 남심을 흔들 섹시한 매력을 드러냈다. Com › 8971471046인스타에 오리 비키니사진올렸다고들은 봉준이 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ, 스타크래프트를 주 컨텐츠로 하는 bj답게 스타여캠bj와 프로게이머 bj와 친분이 많고 방송을 같이 한다.

내 첫 비키니 완벽한 몸은 아니지만 언제 또 입어보겠어. 223 likes, 5 comments duckling_rio on j, 잔디만 밟다 드디어 물만난 해오리 💙🐥. 내 첫 비키니 완벽한 몸은 아니지만 언제 또 입어보겠어.

29 1309 인스타에 오리 비키니사진올렸다고들은 봉준이 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ내가보수적인거야. 잡담 19클 안해본놈이 뭔손님의 정의고 어쩌구 나불대는지. 안녕하세요 more 안녕하세요 more more afreecatv.

보다 못한 시청자들이 이를 지적하자 오리3은 자신이 한 말들이 무슨 문제냐며 오히려 지적한 시청자들을 강퇴하였다. 15 1933 훈제오리 유황오리 ㅋㅋㅋ 50 시즈전탱크 2022. 염석대 오리 비키니 패황시절 스타크래프트.

Erothots Apk

최솜이 눈바디 흰비키니 꼭지 돌출 2, 배우 양정원은 과거 자신의 인스타그램을 통해 godbella 가고 싶다. Com › _yurim유림이오리 @_yurim instagram photos and videos. 아프리카tv 와 유튜브 에서 활동하는 인터넷 방송인이다, 이병 마인이공짜 오리고 나발이고 첨부터 돌려서 다 봤다 고마워 베스트 read more.

e-hen gweda 2016 wbff korea championship diba bikini short 1더블유비에프에프코리아 8분 37초267번 윤유림 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ. 출처 bj오리 윤유림 결혼식 웨딩드레스 화보 비키니 몸매 인스타 캡쳐 결혼식 와주신 모든분들 너무 감사합니다. 15 영상사진 해래해래이 조회177968 추천351. 서유리, bj 변신→비키니 방송 진행까지파격적인 근황 아시아투데이 원문 기사전송 20240925 1359 최종수정 20240925 1612 ai챗으로 요약 방송인 서유리의 파격적인 근황이 관심을 모은다. 비키니 비키니그램 비키니스타그램 비키니추천 비키니몸매 호캉스 풀파티 몸매 몸매스타그램 일상 데일리 selfie bikini. ehentai tag list

diptorial 이병 갓피셜 200427 130047 조회 4052 추천 +3. 여성 피지크나 피규어는 너무 빡센거 맞고 ㅇㅇ. 2018년 아프리카 시상식 올해의 토크. Comcat123123and 1 more link. 숲 soop 잡담 인기글 목록 2023. dnsvkdl

exhentai scat 제곧내 북극사람 그 논리면 지금 인기글 싹다 허락맡아야해요 다 허락없이 클립따서 올리는건데. 불펜 2회차에 104구 미쳤다 투수진에서 가장 빠른 페이스, 겸허. 스크랩 추천인 상세보기 비추천인 상세보기 게시물 신고. Hours ago — 유명 유튜버, 몸보다 작은 비키니 속살 노출 상간녀의 남편과 사랑에 서현숙 치어리더, 귀여운 오리로 변신 상승4. 25일 김슬기는 자신의 인스타그램에 근황이 담긴 사진을 공개했다. eroasmr sleep

erome 김뭉먕 Com › bbs › board오리가 공개한 5년전 운동 열심히 한 시절. 제곧내 북극사람 그 논리면 지금 인기글 싹다 허락맡아야해요 다 허락없이 클립따서 올리는건데. 바비앙 거대한 큰 거유 가슴골로 감사 리액션 7. 글고 오리 부산야방할때 본적잇는데 비율 매우 좋음요 1 크으래요옹 2022. Com › 3227bj오리 윤유림 결혼식 웨딩드레스 화보 비키니 몸매 인스타.

enfp 여자 관심 없을 때 다 술안좋아하고 미래빼고 다 대문자p에다가 미래빼고 사진찍는거 좋아하고 먹는거좋아하고 나이도 다 달라. 고라니율 꼭지에 걸친 오프솔더 신들린 가슴 드리블 4. Com › 3728246285bj 오리3 소개팅으로 만난 일반인과 결혼 합니다. 하고 내년에 또 도전한다 ㅎㅎ 오빠는. 카카오스토리 트위터 페이스북 좋아요 스크랩 신고.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.