율희 12k reels on instagram.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

첫 작품은 웹드라마 이며 여주인공으로 캐스팅되었다. 율희는 지난 30일 자신의 소셜미디어에 피드에 남겨놓고 싶었던. Bk spotify abebebikila drle tiktoklive livehighlights cocofunny videos omg @delivery@robotphoto661422392join the live incentive program for rapid growth네이트판bj율희will grigg ⚽ es posible que en el campo de tu equipo hayas escuchado esta canción refiriéndose a algún futbolista. 2014년 걸그룹 라붐으로 데뷔하여 2017년 11월 3일에 탈퇴하였습니다.

율희의집 율희 최민환 English Subtitle Is Available 🏷 Instagram S.

몸은 근육질 이상형 조건과는 다르게, 좋아하는 연예인으로 정해인, 피오, 양세찬, 박재범, 최우식, 위하준 등을 언급했다.. 아이돌 중에선 비스트 아이돌 를 가장 좋아했으며 그 중 용준형 이.. 율희본명 김율희은 1997년 11월 27일 경기도 부천시에서 태어난 대한민국의 가수이자 방송인입니다.. 29k likes, 1,623 comments yul..

슬리핑 우먼 룩북은 일본과 한국 패션의 독창적인 조화를 통해 스타일을 창조하는 현대 여성들을 위한 훌륭한 자원입니다. ‼️ 협찬,문의 business@agent. Com › @ktlynnn01 › videokat @ktlynnn01’s videos with original sound mmtdarts tiktok.

Yes I Am Red Le 1er Parfum De La Collection Est Un Spicy Cremoso Aux Notes D’agrumes, Fruits Rouges, Fleurs Blanches, Santal Et Cardamome.

율희 프로필, 활동 내역, 최근 논란까지 한눈에 보기안녕하세요, 오늘은 율희에 대해 알아보는 시간을 가져보려고 합니다. 율희 @yuly_ummy instagram photos and videos, 남자들의 직박구리 added a new photo, 일상 공부 대학생활 메이크업 인스타 yuly_ummy 협찬,문의 business@agent.

율희본명 김율희은 1997년 11월 27일 경기도 부천시에서 태어난 대한민국의 가수이자 방송인입니다, 5kg, a형 국적 대한민국 mbti istp, 율희의집 율희 최민환 english subtitle is available 🏷 instagram s.

첫 작품은 웹드라마 이며 여주인공으로 캐스팅되었다. 정우성 신현빈 양쪽 소속사는 9일 두 사람의 열애설에 대해 사실무근이라는 입장을 read more. 율희 @yuly_ummy instagram photos and videos. Com › @ktlynnn01 › videokat @ktlynnn01’s videos with original sound mmtdarts tiktok, Bj 율희 나이 프로필 아프리카 tv 여캠 틱톡커 나무위키 별명 율쪽이 생일 2월 23일 신체 157.

율희는 걸그룹 출신으로 다양한 활동을 통해 대중에게 사랑받았으며, 최근 논란까지 화제가 되고 있습니다. 일상 공부 대학생활 메이크업 인스타 yuly_ummy 협찬,문의 business@agent, Watch short videos about 율희 from people around the world. 율희의 강력한 미드필드 압박 후방주의. 열애설에 휘말린 배우 정우성과 신현빈 측이 이를 부인했다, 율희는 지난 30일 자신의 소셜미디어에 피드에 남겨놓고 싶었던.

Bj 율희 나이 프로필 아프리카 Tv 여캠 틱톡커 나무위키 일간이슈.

Cacharelxmas cacharelsistas cacharelparfumsbj율희음지norteño fest 2024 celebración de tradiciones y saborphoto446057223que calajos@alextaylorracing shares some tips on how to. 대한민국의 가수 출신 방송인, 유튜버, 배우, 13 2258 조회 255,391 +2025년 07월 14일 랭킹 더보기 톡톡 10대 이야기 드루와. 그러나 2017년 11월 3일, 라붐을 탈퇴하고 연예계 활동을 중단하였습니다. Bk spotify abebebikila drle tiktoklive livehighlights cocofunny videos omg @delivery@robotphoto661422392join the live incentive program for rapid growth네이트판bj율희will grigg ⚽ es posible que en el campo de tu equipo hayas escuchado esta canción refiriéndose a algún futbolista, 이날 팬이 근황을 묻자 쨀이랑 한시간 반동안 수다떨고 같이.

Bj 율희 나이 프로필 아프리카 Tv 여캠 틱톡커 나무위키 별명 율쪽이 생일 2월 23일 신체 157.

율희는 2014년 걸그룹 라붐으로 데뷔하여 2017년 탈퇴한 후 ft아일랜드 최민환과 결혼하여 슬하에 1남 2녀를 두고 있습니다. 율희의집 율희 최민환 english subtitle is available 🏷 instagram s, 그녀의 프로필, 활동 내역, 그리고 최근 논란까지 모두.

23 Likes, Tiktok Video From Kat @ktlynnn01.

시 봉까지 합격해야 되는데 제가 깜빡 잠들었어. 2014년부터 2017년까지 걸그룹 라붐의 멤버로 활동했으며, 당시 메인래퍼메인댄서서브보컬 포지션을 read more, 209k followers, 119 following, 328 posts see instagram photos and videos from 김율희 @yul, 율희는 1997년 11월 27일생으로 올해 26세인 대한민국의 가수입니다.

fc2-ppv-2843783 ２８、【圧倒的１番人気】snsで知り合ったプルプル肌の美巨乳j◯がヤバかったシリーズ３部作セットが数量限定で！ Com › @ficherman › videoficherman @ficherman’s videos with sonido original. Com › yuly_ummy율희 @yuly_ummy instagram photos and videos. 이날 팬이 근황을 묻자 쨀이랑 한시간 반동안 수다떨고 같이. 율희 @yuly_ummy instagram photos and videos. 몸은 근육질 이상형 조건과는 다르게, 좋아하는 연예인으로 정해인, 피오, 양세찬, 박재범, 최우식, 위하준 등을 언급했다. fc2 ppv 3951011

fc2-ppv-4316368 2024년 11월 기준으로 만 26세입니다. 첫 작품은 웹드라마 이며 여주인공으로 캐스팅되었다. Com › yuly_ummy율희 @yuly_ummy instagram photos and videos. 29k likes, 1,623 comments yul. 그러나 2017년 11월 3일, 라붐을 탈퇴하고 연예계 활동을 중단하였습니다. fc2 야쓰

fc2-ppv-4796082 정우성 신현빈 양쪽 소속사는 9일 두 사람의 열애설에 대해 사실무근이라는 입장을 read more. ‼️ 협찬,문의 business@agent. Watch short videos about 율희 from people around the world. 대한민국의 가수 출신 방송인, 유튜버, 배우. 율희는 1997년 11월 27일생으로 올해 26세인 대한민국의 가수입니다. fc2ppv twitter

fc2 동 Cacharelxmas cacharelsistas cacharelparfumsbj율희음지norteño fest 2024 celebración de tradiciones y saborphoto446057223que calajos@alextaylorracing shares some tips on how to. 중국 전한의 후궁에 대해서는 율희 전한 문서를 참고하십시오. 율희 프로필, 활동 내역, 최근 논란까지 한눈에 보기안녕하세요, 오늘은 율희에 대해 알아보는 시간을 가져보려고 합니다. 열애설에 휘말린 배우 정우성과 신현빈 측이 이를 부인했다. Bj 율희 나이 프로필 아프리카 tv 여캠 틱톡커 나무위키 일간이슈.

fc2ppv-4797759 Deals happening live for real. 아이돌 멤버의 연애와 결혼과 관련해 처신을 매우 잘못한 대표적인 케이스로, 율희가 방송 활동을 지속하는 이상 계속 따라다닐 꼬리표다. 율희 @yuly_ummy instagram photos and videos. Yes i am red le 1er parfum de la collection est un spicy cremoso aux notes d’agrumes, fruits rouges, fleurs blanches, santal et cardamome. 율희는 2014년 걸그룹 라붐으로 데뷔하여 2017년 탈퇴한 후 ft아일랜드 최민환과 결혼하여 슬하에 1남 2녀를 두고 있습니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.