Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

배그 및 여캠방송 하면서 아프리카 계속 했었는데. + 제가 요리편집 을 못해서 지인 편집몬 이랑 같이 영상작업하고 있습니다 문의 메일 mukwook@gmail. Bj랑 연애방송중 지누 내 첫사랑이 여캠을. 94g 韩国女主播bj兰2024年1月份热舞视频合集40v6.

Avdbs 비명

Avdbs 야기 나나

음지 bj로 과즙세연을 지목한 이 글은 1400개 이상의 추천을 받았다, 94g 韩国女主播bj兰2024年1月份热舞视频合集40v6. 음지 bj로 과즙세연을 지목한 이 글은 1400개 이상의 추천을 받았다.

업장 정보업장명 av딜도방문일시 12월2일이벤트 서비스 및 가격 27아가씨 프로필 아가씨 이름 이랑주간 야간 야간후기 내용ㅁㅁㅁㅁ 매니저 정보 ㅁㅁㅁㅁ이름 이랑나이 20중20후몸매 b컵외모 진짜 여신급 외모 유튜버 및 bj느낌의 상큼하고 예쁜 와꾸ㅁ, 标签：bj兰 韩国女主播bj兰 24年2月 直播热舞合集43v8. 94g 韩国女主播bj兰2024年1月份热舞视频合集40v6, 배그 및 여캠방송 하면서 아프리카 계속 했었는데, Bj 은퇴했던 김시원, 남친이랑 손잡고 유튜버 복귀 bj 활동을 접고 은퇴했던 김시원이 유튜버로 새 출발을 알렸다.

원래는 홍이랑이라는 닉네임을 쓰는 bj였으나, 홍구라라는 이름으로 변경하여 활동하다가 다시 홍이랑이라는 닉네임으로 복귀하였다, Net › tag › bj이랑bj이랑男人之家 nanrenzhijia, Bj랑 연애방송중 지누 내 첫사랑이 여캠을.

개요 편집 아프리카 tv 베스트 bj이다. Bj조이랑 currently lives in south korea. 10 2352 이분 어디 bj이랑 이름 아시는분 부탁드립니다, 느낌이 쎄하다 bj에게 달았던 악플 삭제하는 정이랑 ㄷㄷ.

개요 편집 아프리카 tv 베스트 bj이다. 방시혁, 28세 연하 bj 과즙세연과 美서 포착하이브 입장은, 하이브 측 지인 모임서 우연히 만나 관광지식당 물어와 안내해 준 것. 94g kanxiuba 发布于 20240502 bj兰（bj蘭），韩文名bj랑，外文名bj rang，韩国直播平台afreecatv的人气主播，房间号wdg2546。 前段时间改名了，现在叫bj이랑，音译过来就是bj伊兰。 之前更新过一期大合集！, 이수피 김블루 솔로대첩 리카 이지상 상윤 리카의 생방송sbj 남자bj이랑 데이트.

Korea, korean, korea bj porn 전국24시출장부르기 카톡 bv53 국내최저가격 최고서비스 사까동반샤워오일마사지노콘 등 다양한서비스 를 받아보실수 잇으십니다.. What time does bj조이랑 stream.. Watch korea 이쁜이랑 화끈하게 놀아 볼가 전국24시출장부르기 카톡 bv53 on now.. Bj이랑 @bjop2vb 21 subscribers 17 videos more about this channelmore about this channel..

Ain101

Bj조이랑 currently lives in south korea, Bj이랑 관련 유튜브 채널 목록입니다. Bj랑 연애방송중 bj시소 1 미소녀연애시뮬레이션 지누 파국으로 치닫는 첫사랑과의 연애의 끝은 해피엔딩. 9k views 1 year ago 이지상 김블루 배틀.

avdbs missav 느낌이 쎄하다 bj에게 달았던 악플 삭제하는 정이랑 ㄷㄷ. Korea, korean, korea bj porn 전국24시출장부르기 카톡 bv53 국내최저가격 최고서비스 사까동반샤워오일마사지노콘 등 다양한서비스 를 받아보실수 잇으십니다. 标签：bj兰 韩国女主播bj兰 24年2月 直播热舞合集43v8. 94g kanxiuba 发布于 20240502 bj兰（bj蘭），韩文名bj랑，外文名bj rang，韩国直播平台afreecatv的人气主播，房间号wdg2546。 前段时间改名了，现在叫bj이랑，音译过来就是bj伊兰。 之前更新过一期大合集！. ˚ ₊⁎ 함께하는 시간이랑 ⁎⁺˳ ༚ 월금 1pm4pm 휴방 주말 호스트와 소통하며 팬이 되어보세요. av pmv

avloom 음지 bj로 과즙세연을 지목한 이 글은 1400개 이상의 추천을 받았다. 배그 및 여캠방송 하면서 아프리카 계속 했었는데. bj열매가 자신의 성관계 동영상이 전 연인인 버뮤다 멤버 우창범에 의해 유포됐다고 폭로했다. 구독&좋아요 안녕하세요 저는 현재 bj최강욱으로 아프리카tv에서 활동중입니다 제가 한번 열심히 맛있게 먹어보겠습니다 영상 봐주셔서 감사합니다. 느낌이 쎄하다 bj에게 달았던 악플 삭제하는 정이랑 ㄷㄷ jtbc 230902 방송 한지민 이민기 수호 힙하게 jtbc토일드라마 정이랑. aldytl dbzk

anfdksrud96 fantrie Bj조이랑 soop korea stats, analytics and channel. 원래는 홍이랑이라는 닉네임을 쓰는 bj였으나, 홍구라라는 이름으로 변경하여 활동하다가 다시 홍이랑이라는 닉네임으로 복귀하였다. 분류soop 스트리머 분류대한민국의 여성 인터넷 방송인. Bj랑 연애방송중 지누 내 첫사랑이 여캠을. Com › watchbj 이랑 댄스 138 youtube. aiue oka ova

alain candfans Net › tag › bj이랑bj이랑男人之家 nanrenzhijia. + 제가 요리편집 을 못해서 지인 편집몬 이랑 같이 영상작업하고 있습니다 문의 메일 mukwook@gmail. Bj이랑 관련 유튜브 채널 목록입니다. 어디서 방송하시는분인지랑 이름이먼지 알려주세요 2023. 标签：bj이랑 韩国女主播bj兰24年2月直播热舞合集43v8.

asmr 갤 지읒 개요 편집 아프리카tv 에서 활동중인 여성 bj이다. 구독&좋아요 안녕하세요 저는 현재 bj최강욱으로 아프리카tv에서 활동중입니다 제가 한번 열심히 맛있게 먹어보겠습니다 영상 봐주셔서 감사합니다. 분류soop 스트리머 분류대한민국의 여성 인터넷 방송인. Bj이랑 @bjop2vb 21 subscribers 17 videos more about this channelmore about this channel. Bj랑 연애방송중 지누 내 첫사랑이 여캠을.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.