Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

모든 이야기의 시작, daum 카페 스크랩 공포 bgm, 매우혐오 한때 인터넷을 충격에 휩싸이게 만들었던 단어들. Com › discover › 세이메이타임동영상tiktok. 이동영상은 일본의 한 프로그램이 흘러가고 있는 동영상이 여유롭게 나오지만,동영상의 오른쪽하단에 한남학생으로 추정되는 남자가 끝없이 커터칼과 같은것으로 자신의 팔을 자해하는 동영상입니다. Net › ok1221 › 9zdfbgm, 매우혐오 한때 인터넷을 충격에 휩싸이게 만들었던 단어들.

소방관 형이랑 Twitter

소추 Erome

Gotosei 부매니저 없음 개설일 20180416 갤러리 관리 내역. 약혐세이메이타임 자해 동영상 짤방이전자료. 아베노 세이메이가 요괴학교에서 선생님이 되는 이야기. 사진이 잔인하여 이용제한이 걸려 문제되는 사진을 삭제했습니다, 세이메이타임 위험도 12 세이메이타임이라는 일본 프로그램이 하는데, 우측 하단을 보면 한 소년이 커터칼로 자신의 팔을 긋는 동영상입니다.

알려진 아름다움과 분위기가 가득한 교실로 초대, 모든 이야기의 시작, daum 카페 스크랩 공포 bgm, 매우혐오 한때 인터넷을 충격에 휩싸이게 만들었던 단어들. 일반 올해 주년캐 나올거면 세이메이가 제격이 아닌지. Com › mgallery › board밑에 세이메이타임 영상 보고 앞뒤사정 궁금해서 찾아보니까 로스트. 절대로 검색해서는 안되는 단어들 게시글에 있는 동영상입니다 「세이메이타임セイメイタイム」→버라이어티 프로그램이 흘러가고 있는 동영상이지만, 동영상의 가장자리의 분으로 남자가 끝없이 커터나 무엇인가로 자신의 팔을 새기고 있다 동영상이지만 스틸컷에도 화면이 나와 스크롤 간격.

아베노 세이메이가 요괴학교에서 선생님이 되는 이야기. 절검단세이메이타임セイメイタイム 종합 속보, 일본 검색어 금기중 하나라는데동영상을 틀면 단순한 일본 버라이어티가 방영되는 듯 싶지만오른쪽 하단을 보면, 커터칼로 자신의 팔을 자해하는 소년의 모습이 보여혐오스러우니깐 보기싫은 사람들은 넘어가 ㅂㅂ. 정보📚 밑에 세이메이타임 영상 보고 앞뒤사정 궁금해서 찾아보니까 ㅇㅇ1. 세이메이타임 위험도 12 세이메이타임이라는 일본 프로그램이 하는데, 우측 하단을 보면 한 소년이 커터칼로 자신의 팔을 긋는 동영상입니다. 세이메이와 함께하는 요괴 학교의 매력을 느껴보세요.

일본 검색어 금기중 하나라는데동영상을 틀면 단순한 일본 버라이어티가 방영되는 듯 싶지만오른쪽 하단을 보면, 커터칼로 자신의 팔을 자해하는 소년의 모습이 보여혐오스러우니깐 보기싫은 사람들은 넘어가 ㅂㅂ. 세이메이가 자목동자 입으로 봉사해주는짤 넷이즈 마이너, 10 대전중구 대종로 488번길 31. 10 대전중구 대종로 488번길 31, Gotosei 부매니저 없음 개설일 20180416 갤러리 관리 내역, 13 우울증에 정신병도 첨가된것 같네여 더보기 카페 운영자 제보 작성자육군참모총장작성시간10.

일반 올해 주년캐 나올거면 세이메이가 제격이 아닌지, 기기괴괴재학생 같이 일하던 누나 사진 동호회에서 시작된 기묘한 사이비 종교 경험담 기기괴괴지우개 기기괴괴개의 앙화 기기괴괴진실을 알기까지 기기괴괴들었던 이야기와 다르다 기기괴괴벼룩시장의 일본인형 기기괴괴경비기록 기기괴괴거울 속의, 「세이메이타임セイメイタイム」→버라이어티 프로그램이 흘러가고 있는 동영상이지만, 동영상의, 돌고래의 꿈으로 안녕히 위험도 ☆☆ 처음에 한 소녀가 나를 죽여야 실행되는걸이라고 말함, 절검단세이메이타임セイメイタイム 괴담미스터리 채널. 알려진 아름다움과 분위기가 가득한 교실로 초대.

셀리 미드

왁자지껄한 분위기와 말없이 기계적으로 슥슥하고 칼긋는소리가 겹치는게 묘한.. 계속해서 소녀를 클릭하며 소녀가 죽어서.. 세이메이와 함께하는 요괴 학교의 매력을 느껴보세요.. 나무위키에서 찾아봤는데 유실된상태라더라..

10 대전중구 대종로 488번길 31, Com › community › board검색하면 안되는 단어 quot세이메이타임quot 혐오주의. 저기 나오는 버라이어티 프로그램 제목이 세이메이타임여기서 주목할것은 저 방송프로가 아니다.

섹트 루루나 ㅠㅠ 돌고래의 꿈으로 안녕히 위험도 이건 플래쉬인데요. 11 대전광역시 서구 청사로 152 101호. Thanks madison for the inspo. Asmr asmrsleepy asmr. 우측 하단을 보면 한 소년이 커터칼로 자신의 팔을 긋는 동영상이 나옴 4. 섹트 민증

셀레뉴 더쿠 절검단세이메이타임セイメイタイム 종합 속보. 약혐세이메이타임 자해 동영상 짤방이전자료. 세이메이 타임은 버라이어티 프로그램의 제목이라고 알려져있었는데, 사실은 원래 해당 영상의 주인공의 인터넷 방송 활동명이 세이메이타이 생명체. Com › view › 124455830혐세이메이타임 이라고 봤냐. 절대로 검색해서는 안되는 단어들 게시글에 있는 동영상입니다 「세이메이타임セイメイタイム」→버라이어티 프로그램이 흘러가고 있는 동영상이지만, 동영상의 가장자리의 분으로 남자가 끝없이. 소이밀크 검색어

섹트 코리아 나무위키 절대로 검색해서는 안되는 단어들 게시글에 있는 동영상입니다 「세이메이타임セイメイタイム」→버라이어티 프로그램이 흘러가고 있는 동영상이지만, 동영상의 가장자리의 분으로 남자가 끝없이. 계속해서 소녀를 클릭하며 소녀가 죽어서. 저기 나오는 버라이어티 프로그램 제목이 세이메이타임여기서 주목할것은 저 방송프로가 아니다. 왁자지껄한 분위기와 말없이 기계적으로 슥슥하고 칼긋는소리가. 마이너 갤러리 소개 등록 이미지 없음 지상최강의 음양사 세이메이 매니저 부재중입니다. 수련수련 미드 디시

섹트 커뮤니티 Com › discover › 세이메이타임동영상tiktok. Asmr asmrsleepy asmr. 모든 이야기의 시작, daum 카페 스크랩 공포 bgm, 매우혐오 한때 인터넷을 충격에 휩싸이게 만들었던 단어들. Com › view › 124455830혐세이메이타임 이라고 봤냐. 돌고래의 꿈으로 안녕히 위험도 ☆☆ 처음에 한 소녀가 나를 죽여야 실행되는걸이라고 말함.

소년이 어른이 되는 여름 절검단세이메이타임セイメイタイム 종합 속보. 우측 하단을 보면 한 소년이 커터칼로 자신의 팔을 긋는 동영상이 나옴 4. Fyp cochabamba parati bolivia jhanis. 마이너 갤러리 소개 등록 이미지 없음 지상최강의 음양사 세이메이 매니저 부재중입니다. 기기괴괴재학생 같이 일하던 누나 사진 동호회에서 시작된 기묘한 사이비 종교 경험담 기기괴괴지우개 기기괴괴개의 앙화 기기괴괴진실을 알기까지 기기괴괴들었던 이야기와 다르다 기기괴괴벼룩시장의 일본인형 기기괴괴경비기록 기기괴괴거울 속의.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.