Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › markets › 81755큐티럽 에이블리. Ione entertainment stated that a comeback was planned for 2018. 금속제품의 변색방지를 위해 지퍼팩에 보관해주세요 read more. 럽qt love qt 834 베드로가 심히 통곡한 이유.

김우유 꼭지노출

Kr › beautycutelove뷰티큐티럽 옥션, 삠뽀요 큐티럽후드상하복 상품의 특징, 사이즈, 리뷰, 가격 정보 삠뽀요 큐티럽후드상하복. However, no further news, 소장 추천드리는 제품입니다 model size. Com › cutierub › statusx.

주문 시 410일 이내에 제작되며, 금속 알러지에 민감한 분은 주의하시기 바랍니다.. Com › markets › 81755큐티럽 에이블리.. 5침, 글리터 _ 사이즈 전체 7mm7mm 금속 알러지는 개인차가 심해서 간혹 무니켈에도 반응을 하십니다.. 피노키 mano 320p taupe 170,100원..

나의히어로아카데미아 히토미

한국의류시험연구원 katri에서 인증받은 제품. 2007년 에 방영한 큐티하니 the live 의 오프닝. 신규가입 시 최대 20% 6종 쿠폰팩. 많은 사람들이 자신의 큐티클을 따는 습관을 가지고 있습니다, 표준산업분류, 전자상거래 소매 중개업g47911, 신규가입 시 최대 20% 6종 쿠폰팩.

Likes, 0 comments rainbowdog__ on febru 강아지옷 만들기 수업 큐티럽 후드 원피스🎀 프릴프릴 가득 러블리 후드 원피스💕 창업반 수업 패턴+디자인 수업 수강생 작품 구매문의 @dew. 주소, 61174 광주 북구 면앙로번길, 동 호, Ione entertainment stated that a comeback was planned for 2018. Com 사업자번호 38 영업소재지 광주 북구 면앙로31번길 7, 204동 402호 문흥동,우산아파트 미니샵 히스토리 도움말 미니샵에서 본 상품과 선택한 카테고리, 검색결과 등 나의 쇼핑, 아이디어스에서 판매하는 큐티럽 귀걸이는 레진과 생화로 만든 하트 모양의 꽃을 꾸몄 작품입니다. 많은 사람들이 자신의 큐티클을 따는 습관을 가지고 있습니다.

Com › cutierub › statusx. 지금 쿠팡에서 더 저렴하고 다양한 내의내복 제품들을 확인해보세요. 표준산업분류, 전자상거래 소매 중개업g47911. 말씀정주행 에베소서 3장2 큐티 qt 묵상. 유부모임💓 낮술부터 밤술까지🍻 어딜가도 시끄럽게구는 줌마. Com › 큐티클큐티클이란큐티클 큐티클이란 무엇이며 어떻게 관리해야 하나요.

껌젖 자위

가정에 손때 묻고 눈물자국이 있는 성경이 1권이상은 가보로 있어야 합니다, Comment 걸리쉬하면서도 캐주얼한 무드의 크롭니트를 소개할게요 깔끔한 디자인에 바스트 포켓의 자수디테일로 한층 더 멋스러운 아이템이에요read more. 리오피너클 써지컬 피어싱 큐티러브 2종 택1.

나람 디시 Com › 큐티클큐티클이란큐티클 큐티클이란 무엇이며 어떻게 관리해야 하나요. 가정에 손때 묻고 눈물자국이 있는 성경이 1권이상은 가보로 있어야 합니다. Com › 큐티클큐티클이란큐티클 큐티클이란 무엇이며 어떻게 관리해야 하나요. 5침, 글리터 _ 사이즈 전체 7mm7mm 금속 알러지는 개인차가 심해서 간혹 무니켈에도 반응을 하십니다. 상호 뷰티큐티럽 대표자 김화정 전화번호 8 이메일 kimhwajung15@naver. 김인호 야방녀 porn

김유연 엉밑 다양한 기업분석보고서를 비교하고 원하는 보고서를 구매하세요. 선물용이나 어린이집 답례품등으로도 좋아요. 상호 뷰티큐티럽 대표자 김화정 전화번호 8 이메일 kimhwajung15@naver. 많은 매니큐어사는 당신의 마니를 완벽하게 보이도록 하기 위해 제거하는 것을 선호합니다. Com › profile › 08828096899164884326blogger user profile 큐티럽. 나히아 갤

나미 시 결혼 디시 At the time, five members were already selected and two more positions were open for audition. 8점, 리뷰 192개를 가진 유니프랜드 아동용 큐티럽 민소매 상하의 세트. Com 아동주니어패션 기저귀물티슈 분유유아식 출산육아용품 유모차실내용품 완구교구 신생아유아패션 아동주니어패션 유아동신발잡화 오가닉 국민템 상하복정장세트 점퍼자켓코트 니트가디건조끼 셔츠블라우스 티셔츠맨투맨후드 원피스. 8점, 리뷰 198개를 가진 유니프랜드 아동용 큐티럽 민소매 상하의 세트. 2007년 에 방영한 큐티하니 the live 의 오프닝. 김유정 deepfake

꾸삐바보 유부모임💓 낮술부터 밤술까지🍻 어딜가도 시끄럽게구는 줌마. 지금 쿠팡에서 더 저렴하고 다양한 내의내복 제품들을 확인해보세요. 다양한 기업분석보고서를 비교하고 원하는 보고서를 구매하세요. Comment 걸리쉬하면서도 캐주얼한 무드의 크롭니트를 소개할게요 깔끔한 디자인에 바스트 포켓의 자수디테일로 한층 더 멋스러운 아이템이에요read more. Com 아동주니어패션 기저귀물티슈 분유유아식 출산육아용품 유모차실내용품 완구교구 신생아유아패션 아동주니어패션 유아동신발잡화 오가닉 국민템 상하복정장세트 점퍼자켓코트 니트가디건조끼 셔츠블라우스 티셔츠맨투맨후드 원피스.

나는푸르 아들 펨코 Ione entertainment stated that a comeback was planned for 2018. 상호 뷰티큐티럽 대표자 김화정 전화번호 8 이메일 kimhwajung15@naver. Ione entertainment stated that a comeback was planned for 2018. 피노키 mano 320p taupe 170,100원. Comment 걸리쉬하면서도 캐주얼한 무드의 크롭니트를 소개할게요 깔끔한 디자인에 바스트 포켓의 자수디테일로 한층 더 멋스러운 아이템이에요read more.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.