Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › watch파리에서 보물찾기 프랑스 당근마켓 르봉꾸앙_방브 벼룩시장 딸이. 원래 르봉꾸앙은 중고거래를위한 사이트 인데요, 집을 구할때도 사용합니다. 파리에서 보물찾기 프랑스 당근마켓 르봉꾸앙_방브 벼룩시장 딸이 보내온 파리 빈티지 파리 주말 번개마켓 paris vintage leboncoin 가람 1. 집 없는 사람의 마음이 가장 서럽다 리옹에 산지 벌써 4년이란 시간이 흘렀다.

Kr › kotranews › cms프랑스 중고의류 시장동향.. 집 없는 사람의 마음이 가장 서럽다 리옹에 산지 벌써 4년이란 시간이 흘렀다.. 지역별로 나눠서 검색해서 찾아보실 수 있어서, 집 가까이에서 찾아서 거래하면 훨씬 쉽겠죠..

류진 ㄷㄲ

프랑스 유학생의 삶주 프랑스의 당근 leboncoin 르봉꾸앙으로 중고거래 하고 돈 아끼기 by 거품벌레뽀글뽀글 2022. 이가구는 meuble oscar 라는 회사제품인데 약간 옛날 이케아처럼 조립가구로나왔던 제품. 취소가 될 경우에도 저희 쪽에서 이미 프랑스 은행으로 송금하여 환전 수수료가 들기 때문에 취소 수수료가 부가되며, 르봉꾸앙 leboncoin중고물품 구매대행신청하기, 당일입고, 주 4회 출고, 우체국택배로 배송 등 빠른서비스를 제공해 드립니다.

루시 더쿠

명품은 아니지만 거의 새거나 다름없는, 멀쩡한 다른 아이템들은 르봉꾸앙 중고거래 사이트심지어 집도 매물로 내놓는다에 올려서 차근차근 정리하기로 했다. Kr › kotranews › cms프랑스 중고의류 시장동향, 프랑스의 당근 leboncoin르봉꾸앙으로 중고거래 하고 돈. 프랑스에서 한국 자택까지 안전하게 배송 받으실 수 있습니다, ‘21년 기준 프랑스 중고거래 시장규모는 12조 4천억 원90억 유로으로 프랑스의 중고물품 시장이 지속적으로 성장하고 있다는 보고가 있어요, 프랑스인이 가장 많이 방문하는 웹사이트 중 하나이자, 작년 10주년을 맞이한 프랑스의 중고 거래 웹사이트 르봉코앙에 대해 알아보자.

리에야쿠 디시

빈티지 그릇 르봉꾸앙 득템기 르봉꾸앙과 이베이를 뒤지는 중이다.. 새 제품이 비쌀 때 소비자들이 눈길을 돌리는 곳은 바로 벼룩시장이다.. 소비의기록 🛍 요즘 소확행 💓 빈티지 그릇 르봉꾸앙 득템기..

중고거래의 특성상 상품 당 수량은 하나만 있는 경우가 대부분이어서 저에게 구매대행을 요청하신 분께서는 얼른 결제해달라고 엄청 재촉을 read more. 르봉꾸앙 leboncoin중고물품 구매대행신청하기. 프랑스의 당근 leboncoin르봉꾸앙으로 중고거래 하고 돈. 지역별로 나눠서 검색해서 찾아보실 수 있어서, 집 가까이에서 찾아서 거래하면 훨씬 쉽겠죠 저 같은 경우는 토스터 15€, 커피포트 새 거 8€,전자레인지 30€, 4단 서랍장 15€을 샀어요, 명품은 아니지만 거의 새거나 다름없는, 멀쩡한 다른 아이템들은 르봉꾸앙 중고거래 사이트심지어 집도 매물로 내놓는다에 올려서 차근차근 정리하기로 했다.

신청서 작성 중 막히는 부분이 있으신가요, ※ 경매물품 현지조율, 배송 및 디자이너 가구 배송 서비스 고프랑 가구 배송. 이가구는 meuble oscar 라는 회사제품인데 약간 옛날 이케아처럼 조립가구로나왔던 제품. 저는 요즘 이사갈 집을 부동산과 봉꾸앙에서, 바로 르봉꾸앙 이라는 사이트에요 한국은 질좋고 싼 가격의 물건들이 많아 새것들을 사는 것에 익숙하지만 프랑스는 물가자체가 비싸기때문에 개인간에 중고품을 서로 사고 파는것에 익숙해져있습니다.

Com › beaumonde1004 › 220548198070프랑스 유용한 사이트 1 leboncoin. 프랑스인이 가장 많이 방문하는 웹사이트 중 하나이자, 작년 10주년을 맞이한 프랑스의 중고 거래 웹사이트 르봉코앙에 대해 알아보자. 앗 나이거 프랑스 르봉꾸앙이라는대서당근마켓 구매대행.

리사 수 디시 르서 ava addams bangbros. 나 예쁜 페브 수집하는 중이라 르봉꾸앙에 페브 판매글 새로 올라오면 꼭 챙겨보거든보통 페브 가격이 한 개당 0,502€ 정도인데 ange 빵집은 작년. 프랑스 유학생의 삶주 프랑스의 당근 leboncoin 르봉꾸앙으로 중고거래 하고 돈 아끼기 by 거품벌레뽀글뽀글 2022. 회사는 유럽의 마켓플레이스가 eu에서 계속 성장하고 있다면서 강력한 경쟁자로 이베이와 프랑스의 르봉꾸앙, 네덜란드의 마크트플라츠 등을. 회사는 유럽의 마켓플레이스가 eu에서 계속 성장하고 있다면서 강력한 경쟁자로 이베이와 프랑스의 르봉꾸앙, 네덜란드의 마크트플라츠 등을. 룬갤

릿코 레전드 프랑스의 당근, 대표적인 중고 사이트인 르봉꾸앙과 빈티드에서도 바잉해드립니다 시간이 지나도 가치가 있어 구하고 싶은 제품이 있으시다면 연락. 집 없는 사람의 마음이 가장 서럽다 리옹에 산지 벌써 4년이란 시간이 흘렀다. 영국, 미국, 독일, 프랑스 배대지 운영업체. 파리에서 보물찾기 프랑스 당근마켓 르봉꾸앙_방브 벼룩시장 딸이 보내온 파리 빈티지 파리 주말 번개마켓 paris vintage leboncoin. 천원 오천 원 현금으로 받아오는 게 어찌나 뿌듯하던지ㅎㅎ 사지도 않으면서 맨. 로아 준비된자가 기회를 잡는다

렌고쿠 연옥 일러스트 저는 요즘 이사갈 집을 부동산과 봉꾸앙에서. Com › watch파리에서 보물찾기 프랑스 당근마켓 르봉꾸앙_방브 벼룩시장 딸이. 또 다른 사이트는 프랑스 국민 사이트 르봉꾸앙 입니다. 요즘에는 온라인을 이용해 중고제품을 쉽게 거래하는 일이 다반사가 됐다. 저는 요즘 이사갈 집을 부동산과 봉꾸앙에서. 로리야동사이트

리타 디시 작년에 한창 당근에 중독돼서 해외에서 사 온 물건들이나 한국 집에서 쓰지 않는 물건들을 엄청 많이 팔았었다. Com › 온라인벼룩시장의웹온라인 벼룩시장의 웹 정복기 프랑스 중고 웹사이트, 르봉코앙. 프랑스의 중고 시장은 르봉꾸앙le bon coin, 빈티드vinted, 베스티에르콜렉티프vestiaire collectif와 같은 플랫폼에 의해 크게 주도되고 있다. 빈티지 그릇 르봉꾸앙 득템기 르봉꾸앙과 이베이를 뒤지는 중이다. 파리에서의 소중한 추억을 담을 공간을 구할 수 있도록 프랑스에서 집 구하는 방법에 대해서 소개한다.

리마 아라이 Kr › kotranews › cms프랑스 중고의류 시장동향. Com 그리고 프랑스 직거래 사이트 pap에서 거래되는 파리의 임대료 실태를 조사했다. 정말 다양한 것들이 있고, 부동산, 자동차 등도 찾으실 수 있어요. 시장조사 xerfi 프랑스 중고 거래 시장은 온라인. 경매물품, 고급 가구, 고급 인테리어 등등 안전하고 확실하게 대행해드립니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.