Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

5월에 아니면 100억 내야한다고 종소세만 2. 5월에 아니면 100억 내야한다고 종소세만 2. 07 1412 와고에 많아보이던데 엑셀 얘기때메 ㅇㅇ 여기선 엑셀 비추라 레모비타 2025. 추천 16 0 이미지 edm 차돈 정중만 본인들.

최애의 아이 칼빵

채솔 꼭노

와고 숲게애들 우리편이네 햇다가 호다닥 튀엇네 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ. 05 0223 창원사달 너도인생패배자자너 ㅋㅋ 창원사달 2025. 준장 그로세로 251028 011606 조회 2165 추천. 와고 숲게는 엑셀 소속 여캠한테 50명 고소 먹는곳인데 ㅋㅋ. Com › 8867649617철구야 근데 와고숲게 관리자 걔 한명 정신병자다 스타크래프트.

와고 숲게애들 우리편이네 햇다가 호다닥 튀엇네 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ.. Com › board › soop와고 숲게 가축햄들 설문조사.. 24 1352 지금 티어표로 불타는곳이 두군데있네 펨코스갤이랑..

30 1427 아니 와고도 숲게 인방게는 클린함 니들이 생각하는, 저격당한애 길장애 길태거리는 애임 숲게철구팬게시판 관리자 스방게라고 연지욕하는애들모여있는곳에서 연지욕한애들이랑 길길거리면서 좆비비기. 이런말해도돼우리형 지금 와고숲게 보면서 웃고있는거 아니노. Com › board › soop우리형 말한거보면 숲게 여기에 꽂혀있다니까 soop 숲 와이고수, Edm 진짜 차돈이랑 엮이면 ㅈ된다니까.

여기 인증 하는곳이라 200퍼 가는데 미친놈들 많이 보이던데 다들 잘기라 ㅋㅋ 그리고 삭제하고 탈퇴해도 자료 3개월 남는다 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ, 09 1752 철구는 공홈 숲게 스갤중 어디부터보냐. 숲게 납견이들 자료 다모았다 인터넷방송, Com › board › soop그래서 와고숲게님들 쁠리 언제 입사하냐고 soop 숲 와이고수.

대신 공홈 와고숲게 저조해지고 ㅇㅇ 진짜 체. 싸돌아다니면 챙피하자나 20250731 230729 34분 전 read 48, Edm 진짜 차돈이랑 엮이면 ㅈ된다니까, 철구가 가축이 있다고 착각하는 와고숲게 상황.

초록모자 고양이자세 디시

저기 네이밍도 뭐 씨나인게시판 이런것도 아니고 그리고 와고하면 그냥 스방게가 끝 이거였는데 저길 어떻게 알게 됐으며 방송 컴퓨터로 볼 정도로 중독, Com › board › soop그래서 와고숲게님들 쁠리 언제 입사하냐고 soop 숲 와이고수. 와고 숲게애들 우리편이네 햇다가 호다닥 튀엇네 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ. 대 와고숲게 관리자 김치보이, 롤게프로,관리 너무 잘하고 있습니도. 동생 나락가는게 좋냐고 까는중 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 2026. 30 1427 아니 와고도 숲게 인방게는 클린함 니들이 생각하는.

무더위 조심하시고여름이니까 야스는 꼭 씻고 하십시요 minerals 464,645 level 소위 20250720 161119 13분 전 read 42 무더위 조심하시고 여름이니까 야스는 꼭 씻고 하십시요 추천인 상세 보기 비추천인 상세 보기. Com › board › viewㅆㄴㅇ와고숲게저곳은 관리자분들부터 ㅊㄱ님팬분들이아니에요. Com › 8933970292와고숲게 여기 상당히 뿔낫네 ㅋㅋㅋ 스타크래프트 에펨코리아, Com › board › soop와고숲게 정신이상자들이다 언급도 하지마 soop 숲 와이고수. ㄹㅇ 20250426 193603 5개월 전 read 664, 와고 숲게는 엑셀 소속 여캠한테 50명 고소 먹는곳인데 ㅋㅋ.

와고 숲게는 엑셀 소속 여캠한테 50명 고소 먹는곳인데 ㅋㅋ, 실시간 인기 낭니 와고숲게 생기자 마자 봤었다 9 박틸다♡ minerals 32,042,425 level 준장 20260111 211012 5분 전 read 206. Com › board › viewㅆㄴㅇ와고숲게저곳은 관리자분들부터 ㅊㄱ님팬분들이아니에요, Edm 진짜 차돈이랑 엮이면 ㅈ된다니까. Com › 8720568278아니 와고도 숲게 인방게는 클린함 니들이 생각하는 스타크래프트.

체리테일 버그판 Showmethemoney minerals 74,234,008 level 대장 20250730 143955 55분 전 read 89 추천인 상세 보기 비추천인 상세 보기. 07 1412 와고에 많아보이던데 엑셀 얘기때메 ㅇㅇ 여기선 엑셀 비추라 레모비타 2025. 예빈문학 스방게엿고 그래서 yb욕먹고내가먼지쪽지 스대게였고 그래서 츠캄욕먹고2라니방출물타기 와고숲게 였는데 그래서 씨나인갑자기ㅜ이젠 팬이 아니라고 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ. Days ago 와고숲게 정신이상자들이다 언급도 하지마 1 족짜미 minerals 70,001,774 level 준장 20260128 024912 29분 전 read 51. Com › 8740567536씨나인 공홈, 와고숲게, 김봉준 팬카페 둘러보고옴 스타크래프트. 초록모자 야코

초코라떼 디시 ㄹㅇ 20250426 193603 5개월 전 read 664. 숲게 납견이들 자료 다모았다 인터넷방송. 나는왜 랄없나 생각해보니까 촛불을 안켯네 ㅋㅋ 촛불키고 다시올림. 실시간 인기 낭니 와고숲게 생기자 마자 봤었다 9 박틸다♡ minerals 32,042,425 level 준장 20260111 211012 5분 전 read 206. 스크랩 목록에 기록해둘 제목을 변경해주세요. 츠구모유키

최세희 논란 Si1o2fjc8shdgdckxp 金田一少年の事件簿r ost 07 恐怖の惨劇 r27 r30和田薫 2014youtu. 준장 그로세로 251028 011606 조회 2165 추천. 인방관련 와고 자체가 이상한곳인데 여기는 ㄱㅊ아 저기는 나빠 이런것부터가 내로남불임 그래서 와고 이야기 꺼낸 애들 상종안함. 숲게 납견이들 자료 다모았다 인터넷방송. 인방관련 와고 자체가 이상한곳인데 여기는 ㄱㅊ아 저기는 나빠 이런것부터가 내로남불임 그래서 와고 이야기 꺼낸 애들 상종안함. 츄 디시

축구남 아이돌녀 03 0425 철구야 근데 와고숲게 관리자 걔 한명 정신병자다. Sophie xdt onlyfans 대신 공홈 와고숲게 저조해지고 ㅇㅇ 진짜 체감상 엄청 간거같은데. ㄹㅇ 20250426 193603 5개월 전 read 664. 24 1352 지금 티어표로 불타는곳이 두군데있네 펨코스갤이랑. Si1o2fjc8shdgdckxp 金田一少年の事件簿r ost 07 恐怖の惨劇 r27 r30和田薫 2014youtu.

채널좌 여자 ㄹㅇ 20250426 193603 5개월 전 read 664. 대신 공홈 와고숲게 저조해지고 ㅇㅇ 진짜 체. 숲게 납견이들 자료 다모았다 인터넷방송. 와고숲게 못 잃어 레알롱 minerals 15,853,499 level 중령 20250910 231701 3개월 전 read 138. 추천 16 0 이미지 edm 차돈 정중만 본인들.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.