Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

장르성인작가키제이완결유무 및 회차정보220화 미완파일형식아무거나 각종 웹툰 미리보기 no. About where to read discussion glossary. 소녀의 부끄러운 염원을 실현시키는 경이의 테크닉, 그것이 최면술이다. 상황은 이세계에 소환되기 전, 오후 8시를 넘어.

코믹파이어 공식 웹사이트 tv 애니메이션 일본에 어서 오세요 엘프 씨.. 1996년부터 칵테일 소프트f&c현 fc02 사에서 출시한 에로게 시리즈..

Mib ㄷㄹ

Love Iwara

1 전생 마왕의 줄리엣1 꿈꾸는 남자는 현실주의자1 옆집 천사님 때문에 어느샌가 인간적으로 타락한 사연1 죄의 궤적2 무한. 상황은 이세계에 소환되기 전, 오후 8시를 넘어. 여친과 결혼하기 위해 장모님을 xx한다, Com › 1951유희용으로 몇몇 이미지를 제미나이로 생성해 달라고 했는데 재미있네.

츠키시로 히토미 물드는 세계의 내일로부터 카시와 히토미 nhk에 어서 오세요 코시가야 히토미 주식회사 마지루미에 토오노 히토미 데빌 서머너 소울 해커즈 타다이라 히토미 단간론파 모브 이와다 히루토와 비뚤어진 학원. 한국문화원은 작가 황보름과의 대화 및 사인회가 오는 9월 15일 일요일 오후 2시에 주브라질한국문화원에서 진행될 예정이다, 주로 남자들만 좋아하는 취미 철도, rc, av 배우, 스포츠 등, S노벨 ‘어서 오세요 실력지상주의 교실에’의 매력을 한껏 살린 코미컬라이즈.

Luvhannazuki Blowjob

Nhk에 어서오세요 2기 엔딩곡어지러운 세계속에서 1기 퍼즐도 명곡이라지만 이곡도 진짜 좋은거 같음. 한국어판은 2006년에 코믹스가 출간되면서 학산문화사 의 파우스트노벨즈 레이블로 정발되었다. 볼룸에 오신 것을 환영합니다 일본어 ボールルームへようこそ은 타케우치 토모가 그린 일본의 만화이다. 신 nhk에 어서오세요 라는 신작 단편이 나온다, Yuuichi our protagonist is on night shift at his normal job in his normal life, when suddenly an elf appears and whisks him away to. 코믹파이어 공식 웹사이트 tv 애니메이션 일본에 어서 오세요 엘프 씨.

가정용 486 pc가 보편화되던 시기와. 피아캐롯이라는 이름의 패밀리 레스토랑을 배경으로 한 육성 read more. 한복 입은 엘프를 그려달라고 했더니 이렇게 나오더군요.

maple oh video 한국문화원은 작가 황보름과의 대화 및 사인회가 오는 9월 15일 일요일 오후 2시에 주브라질한국문화원에서 진행될 예정이다. Search result of av세계에%2b어서오세요 best japan av porn site, free forever, high speed, no lag, over 100,000 videos, daily update, no ads while playing video. 제목의 표기에 대해서는 주로 어서오세요라고 붙여서 쓰이는 경우가 많으나 어서와 오세요 사이에 띄어쓰기 한 정식발매본상에서의 표기를 따랐다. Ave mujica의 세계에 ave mujica는 부시로드 의 미디어 믹스 프로젝트 bang dream. 주제별 매운맛 포르노 3d, 헨타이, 애니메이션, 애니메이션, 하이틴. male tube hd

mib19.co.jr 신기하고 신나는 도색의 세계도색서점에 어서 오세요. 볼룸에 오신 것을 환영합니다 일본어 ボールルームへようこそ은 타케우치 토모가 그린 일본의 만화이다. 희망하는 학교나 회사에 거의 100퍼센트 들어갈 수 있게 해주는 일본 굴지의 명문고 ‘고도 육성 고등학교’. 소녀의 부끄러운 염원을 실현시키는 경이의 테크닉, 그것이 최면술이다. ☆일부이처 세계에 어서 오세요♪ 3ping lovers. menode

mh실장 대담회 황보름 작가와의 대화 및 사인회 주브라질한국문화원. 희망하는 학교나 회사에 거의 100퍼센트 들어갈 수 있게 해주는 일본 굴지의 명문고 ‘고도 육성 고등학교’. 주로 남자들만 좋아하는 취미 철도, rc, av 배우, 스포츠 등. 상황은 이세계에 소환되기 전, 오후 8시를 넘어. 주제별 매운맛 포르노 3d, 헨타이, 애니메이션, 애니메이션, 하이틴. loil 히토미

mib noah erome 소녀의 부끄러운 염원을 실현시키는 경이의 테크닉, 그것이 최면술이다. 밀레니엄 이전의 에로 게임 들어가며 windows 95가 국내에 유통되던 시절, 설치 기사나 동네 형이 말없이 설치해 준 폴더가 하나 있었다. 행사나 방송 참가 시에도 얼굴을 가리는 등 신비주의로. 1996년부터 칵테일 소프트f&c현 fc02 사에서 출시한 에로게 시리즈. 소설가가 되자 일본에 어서 오세요 엘프 씨.

meriol chan fansly porn 감독은 키시 세이지 & 하시모토 히로유키, 방영 시기는 2017년 7월. 쿠팡이 추천하는 미궁도서 관련 혜택과 특가. 신 nhk에 어서오세요 라는 신작 단편이 나온다. Ave mujica의 세계에 ave mujica는 부시로드 의 미디어 믹스 프로젝트 bang dream. 장르성인작가키제이완결유무 및 회차정보220화 미완파일형식아무거나 각종 웹툰 미리보기 no.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.