Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Av女優のカテゴリー記事一覧 七ツ森りり 浮気した妻をとことん犯す涙ながらに悦びさえ感じるほどに。 吉高寧々 歴史と伝統に抱かれた密会禁断にして崇高な裸。 初美なのか 最高のデートの後に初めてのお泊まりホテルでのイチャラブハメ撮り。. 1位 石川澪 1373票 2位 松川令奈 1373票 3位 青坂あおい 1101票 4位 井上もも 1004票 5位 佐野秋帆 998票 6位 桜みお 981票 7位 早瀬すみれ 836票 8位 楓. Com › listpages › av1av女優 無修正アダルト動画 カリビアンコム. Com › actress女優一覧 人妻・熟女no.

레제 죽음 만화

라 코코 치지 직

楽天tv アダルト人気av女優ランキングページです。1位から30位まで人気な女優でいっぱいです！楽天tvは話題の最新avから、有名女優出演作品、無料サンプル動画など豊富に取り揃えています。お得なav見放題プランあり！.. Com › actress女優一覧 人妻・熟女no.. Fanza ファンザアダルトdvd・ブルーレイ通販のav女優一覧。期待の新人や人気のおすすめav女優をピックアップ！今月の注目女優を見逃すな！.. Av是英语adult video的缩写，即成人电影，日本社会学家江原由美子在《性的商品化》一书中，称av产业是以唤起男性性兴奋为目的而进行的女性裸体影像买卖行为，也是社会男权的..

레제 페미

Fanza ファンザ エロ動画・アダルトビデオの月間av女優ランキング1～20位。人気av女優が出演するエロ動画・アダルトビデオを高画質・格安でダウンロード販売！. 1位 大石紗季 2532票 2位 小早川怜子 2514票 3位 伊東沙蘭 2152票 4位 夏目彩春 1481票 5位 松川令奈 1266票 6位 石川澪 1252票 7位 山瀬美紀 1216票 8位. Cgilivejupiter1 風吹けば名無し＠o／ 20210718日 150633.

Tw › news › society她受邀赴日當av女優翻譯還要與男攝影師同房 感覺「怪怪的」拒絕反被告, 1位 石川澪 1373票 2位 松川令奈 1373票 3位 青坂あおい 1101票 4位 井上もも 1004票 5位 佐野秋帆 998票 6位 桜みお 981票 7位 早瀬すみれ 836票 8位 楓, Tv 免費高清av在線看 j片av看到飽.

딴비 디시 ニート歴20年のavソムリエによるオススメのav女優さん 100名をご紹介します。平成の初めから令和まで、av界の歴史に残るav女優さんを作品とともにご紹介. Av女優一覧 アダルト動画ナビはxvideosやtube8、pornhub、xhamsterなどのエロ動画をまとめて探せるサイトです. 身為av狂熱者的小編，要真心向你推薦那些讓人想要打手槍的性感av女優！ 名次, 女優名字, 特徴・推薦點. Day ago av女優 佐藤千夏さとうちなつ satochinatsuのavエロ動画・無料ナド。生年月日：？ 年齢：？歳 身長：157cm スリーサイズ：86eカップ巨乳6388 属性：素人／ナンパ／ハメ撮り／美少女／ムチムチ／パイパン. J杯童顏巨乳《白玉》其實是fc2無碼發片姬！ 影片一特徵被抓鮑！ 童顏av女優《桜井みなみ》出道前fc2下馬！read more. 디어달리아 논란

레제 꼭지 디시 共找到av女優3193人 最多人看 第1頁. 楽天tv アダルト人気av女優ランキングページです。1位から30位まで人気な女優でいっぱいです！楽天tvは話題の最新avから、有名女優出演作品、無料サンプル動画など豊富に取り揃えています。お得なav見放題プランあり！. 公式moodyz ムーディーズの女優一覧ページ 求人情報 社員募集（新卒採用） 社員募集（中途採用） 外部デザイナー募集 外部動画編集クリエイター募集 カメラマン募集 ライター募集 メイク募集 スタイリスト募集 webディレクター募集 外部映像 av編集スタッフ募集. Hours ago mida498ムーディーズから配信されてる付き合った記念日に海外旅行へ行くため、ヌードモデルのバイトをすると言ったカノジョ（光稀）からの連絡が途絶えた―― 僕だけの神乳を揉みしだかれてメス顔晒してた寝取られ中出し映像 百田光稀に出てるav女優名を紹介。また別名義や他の. 明日花的作品！相信看過沒有不喜歡的，身材與表情每秒都是這麼樣的扣人心弦啊！ av女優排排站你不可. 디하클 후기

라이브스코어 네임드핫 Tv 免費高清av在線看 j片av看到飽. 1位 石川澪 1373票 2位 松川令奈 1373票 3位 青坂あおい 1101票 4位 井上もも 1004票 5位 佐野秋帆 998票 6位 桜みお 981票 7位 早瀬すみれ 836票 8位 楓. Tw › news › society她受邀赴日當av女優翻譯還要與男攝影師同房 感覺「怪怪的」拒絕反被告. 公式moodyz ムーディーズの女優一覧ページ 求人情報 社員募集（新卒採用） 社員募集（中途採用） 外部デザイナー募集 外部動画編集クリエイター募集 カメラマン募集 ライター募集 メイク募集 スタイリスト募集 webディレクター募集 外部映像 av編集スタッフ募集. Minutes ago — 圓井萌華円井萌華」原本是日本地下偶像，曾經來台表演，2022年5月正式加入sod公司，出道成為av女優。不久前她才辭職離開了經紀公司，近日在社群自我介紹. 딜도 5성급 호텔

디엠 obj 뜻 楽天tv アダルト人気av女優ランキングページです。1位から30位まで人気な女優でいっぱいです！楽天tvは話題の最新avから、有名女優出演作品、無料サンプル動画など豊富に取り揃えています。お得なav見放題プランあり！. 楽天tv アダルトav女優一覧ページです。人気のトップ女優から最近デビューのあの子も！楽天tvは話題の最新avから、有名女優出演作品、無料サンプル動画など豊富に取り揃えています。お得なav見放題プランあり！. Days ago av女優・浅倉あすかデビュー・経歴・プロフィール av女優・浅倉あすかのプロフィールですが、2014年11月リリースの『幼すぎる子持ち妻 浅倉あすか 18歳 avデビュー』にてavデビュー。 同月にはオムニバスや素人作品含め他に4タイトルリリースされています。. Days ago ハロプロ系ルックスav女優 石原希望、イケメン♂パラダイスのようなパロディavに出てしまうww av女優 ボーイッシュ ムーディーズ 乱交 石原希望 美女 2026年1月25日 2256 5コメント tweet ※当サイトはアフィリエイト広告を利用しています. I 一心惠里香 草莓牛奶av女優 ichika 一條綺美香 一之瀨亞美莉 一之瀨梓 一之瀨鈴 伊賀真子.

디시 텀 가학 Hours ago mida498ムーディーズから配信されてる付き合った記念日に海外旅行へ行くため、ヌードモデルのバイトをすると言ったカノジョ（光稀）からの連絡が途絶えた―― 僕だけの神乳を揉みしだかれてメス顔晒してた寝取られ中出し映像 百田光稀に出てるav女優名を紹介。また別名義や他の. Av女優一覧 アダルト動画ナビはxvideosやtube8、pornhub、xhamsterなどのエロ動画をまとめて探せるサイトです. Com › actresslist_sub1av女優ランキング 無料av動画. Fanza ファンザ エロ動画・アダルトビデオの月間av女優ランキング1～20位。人気av女優が出演するエロ動画・アダルトビデオを高画質・格安でダウンロード販売！. 1位 石川澪 1373票 2位 松川令奈 1373票 3位 青坂あおい 1101票 4位 井上もも 1004票 5位 佐野秋帆 998票 6位 桜みお 981票 7位 早瀬すみれ 836票 8位 楓.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.