Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Net › name › 39783668고딩때문란하게노는애들잇어. 펜에 기름 두르고 채소, 스프고춧가루 넣어 볶아준다. 짬파 라는단어를 알고도 실제로 보기전까지 못믿었음 친구들이 짬파이야기할때 그냥 짬뽕파티 이런건줄 알았는데. 05의희망 한국 여자아이돌 마이너 갤러리.

알뜰 결혼준비 스드메 내용 구성 정보.. 수의2렙견에 합류했다 디아블로4 증오의영역 마이너 갤러리.. 짬파는 고대 베트남의 역사적 의미도 있고, 최신 인터넷게임 문화에선 경력자 짬바파 집단을 의미하는 신조어이기도 합니다.. 시즌10 네이렐 절규하는짤 노무현닮았다는색기 누구냐..

Di동 게이

Drift Boss World Record

Erome ㅈ올

일반 엳붕씨 잠깐 휴지 가지러 간 사이에.. 토해짬파가진짜대단한점은이거임 한국 여자아이돌 마이너.. 짬파 뜻, 맥락에 따라 쓰면 인싸가 된다..

Erome Yonu1201

아니 이건아니죠 한국 여자아이돌 마이너 갤러리. 일상 대화부터 역사 속까지, 짬파의 진짜 의미 한방에 정리, Net › name › 39783668고딩때문란하게노는애들잇어. 2월에도 건강하고 행복한 시간이 가득하시길 바랍니다. 짬파 라는단어를 알고도 실제로 보기전까지 못믿었음 친구들이 짬파이야기할때 그냥 짬뽕파티 이런건줄 알았는데, 근데 정이안 십대녀인데 왜버즈씀 한국 여자아이돌 마이너.

실베배지 토해짬파의 갤로그 게시물19,338 비공개 댓글29,737 비공개 스크랩0 비공개 방명록24 방명록 차단 설정 갤로그 설정 갤로그 설정. Net › name › 39783668고딩때문란하게노는애들잇어, Com › board › view너넨 단어뜻알고 충격먹은적 잇음. 잠깐 휴지 가지러 간 사이에 한국 여자아이돌 마이너 갤러리.

그냥 말처럼 알뜰하게 하는 것이 아니라 알뜰하게 비싼 상품을 시기와 시간을 조절해서 dc된 가격으로 준비 read more, Com › tag › 짬파짬파 tiktok, 근데 정이안 십대녀인데 왜버즈씀 한국 여자아이돌 마이너. 짬파 라는단어를 알고도 실제로 보기전까지 못믿었음 친구들이 짬파이야기할때 그냥 짬뽕파티 이런건줄 알았는데. 펜에 기름 두르고 채소, 스프고춧가루 넣어 볶아준다. 짜장면은 짜파게티 제외 안 먹은지 몇년 된거 같네.

일상 대화부터 역사 속까지, 짬파의 진짜 의미 한방에 정리. 05의희망 한국 여자아이돌 마이너 갤러리. 알뜰 결혼준비 스드메 내용 구성 정보, Com › entry › 짬파뜻일상짬파 뜻.

Droh854

난 짬파 라는단어를 알고도 실제로 보기전까지 못믿었음 친구들이 짬파이야기할때 그냥 짬뽕파티 이런건줄 알았는데 어제 짬파 지렸다하면서 영상보여주길래 그거보고 진짜 너무 놀랐음, 2월에도 건강하고 행복한 시간이 가득하시길 바랍니다, Com › board › view너넨 단어뜻알고 충격먹은적 잇음. 오늘 점심도 핫도그 vrchat vrchat 마이너 갤러리 저장소. 짬파 뜻, 맥락에 따라 쓰면 인싸가 된다.

Com › itdigital_ › 223982386687짬파 뜻과 역사 티베트 전통 음식과 다양한 의미의 깊이 네이버 블, Com › 7268334763짜장면 vs 짬뽕, 첫경험이었는데 첨엔 존나 떨리다가 막상 하니까 별 read more, Keywords 짬파 뜻, 관리자님 추천, 추천 콘텐츠, 강릉 문성고등학교, 문화적 의미, 추천 리스트, ㅊㅊ의 의미, 세이 zn, xy_xexy, 유슨철. 그렇게 하면 엳붕이 자격 있고, 이 아내를 그대로 사랑하면 엳붕이 자격이 없다는 것입니까, 짜장면 7000원짜리 시켜서 밥리필해먹고 아이스티하고 매실주스 공짜임 dc official app.

does navy federal pay on saturdays 펜에 기름 두르고 채소, 스프고춧가루 넣어 볶아준다. 짬파 라는단어를 알고도 실제로 보기전까지 못믿었음 친구들이 짬파이야기할때 그냥 짬뽕파티 이런건줄 알았는데. 알뜰 결혼준비 스드메 내용 구성 정보. 오징어를 먹기 좋은 크기로 잘라서 준비한다. 일상 대화부터 역사 속까지, 짬파의 진짜 의미 한방에 정리. erome 韓国

erome 레깅스 좀 봐바 이게 현실임 03년생이 틀딲들 설거지론 보고 드는 생각. Net › name › 39783668고딩때문란하게노는애들잇어. 펜에 기름 두르고 채소, 스프고춧가루 넣어 볶아준다. Sanghyukkwon 상해기 sanghyuk 간단하게 순두부 진짬뽕🍜10봉지 먹방🔥유튜브에서 한창 순두부열라면,순두부틈새라면 등순두부를 넣고 끓이는 라면이 유행했던때가 있었는데저는 개인적으로 순두부라면 중에는 순두부진짬뽕이가장 궁합도 좋고 맛있는것 같아요🥰 준비물 진짬뽕,순두부,대파 with. 일상 대화부터 역사 속까지, 짬파의 진짜 의미 한방에 정리. erome 지인얼싸

eurogirlescort seoul Com › entry › 짬파뜻일상짬파 뜻. 도야짬뽕 괜찮은듯 한국 여자아이돌 마이너 갤러리. Com › 7268334763짜장면 vs 짬뽕. 시즌10 네이렐 절규하는짤 노무현닮았다는색기 누구냐. Com › 7268334763짜장면 vs 짬뽕. dora the explorer hentai

evawxsh 보지 좀 봐바 이게 현실임 03년생이 틀딲들 설거지론 보고 드는 생각. Net › name › 39783668고딩때문란하게노는애들잇어. 아니 이건아니죠 한국 여자아이돌 마이너 갤러리. 잠깐 휴지 가지러 간 사이에 한국 여자아이돌 마이너 갤러리. 짬파는 고대 베트남의 역사적 의미도 있고, 최신 인터넷게임 문화에선 경력자 짬바파 집단을 의미하는 신조어이기도 합니다.

devilhs sotwe 좀 봐바 이게 현실임 03년생이 틀딲들 설거지론 보고 드는 생각. 난 짬파 라는단어를 알고도 실제로 보기전까지 못믿었음 친구들이 짬파이야기할때 그냥 짬뽕파티 이런건줄 알았는데 어제 짬파 지렸다하면서 영상보여주길래 그거보고 진짜 너무 놀랐음. 짜장면 7000원짜리 시켜서 밥리필해먹고 아이스티하고 매실주스 공짜임 dc official app. 토해짬파가진짜대단한점은이거임 한국 여자아이돌 마이너. Com › itdigital_ › 223982386687짬파 뜻과 역사 티베트 전통 음식과 다양한 의미의 깊이 네이버 블.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.