Net › politics › 4076700205더쿠 이동형 이새끼는 지가 뱉은 말부터 사과도 못하는 인간이 누가.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Sid100 교묘하게 물타네 니가 우리보고 작세라며 아니 유튜버 새끼들 다 쳐알고있으면서. 더쿠에서도 인기 인증한 이동형 작가님 4. Net › politics › 4076647373더쿠 이동형 오늘 유튜버들한테 욕먹었다고 또 징징대는중. 최초 윤과문이 어케만낫고 언제부터고 전부파묘.

Net › Politics › 4076690012더쿠 이동형 이새끼 늘 중요할때 개소리로 물을 흐리네.

과거 ‘진보 성향 지역’이라던 마포나 성동, 영등포까지도 최근 여론조사나 투표 경향에서 보수 쏠림.. 이동형 시간이 흐를수록 합당반대의견이 더 높아질수밖에 없다 1..

케이돌토크 잡담 이동형 싫어하긴 하는데 여긴 뭔 김어준 까면 갈라치기하지말라면서 이동형은 뚱댓으로 까서 웃김 440 21 무명의 더쿠 Stheqoo.

onair 이동형 더워룸인가 한 10초봤는데 373 0 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo.. 칙쇼개딸더쿠놈들 분하지만 이번만은 임시동맹이다 2025..

남종석의 불한당들 이동형 작가가 진행하고 이동형 작가 사단의 멤버들인 남태우, 세작본명윤종훈, 오창석의 이름들의 앞글자, 중간글자, 뒷글자를 조합해서 만든.

이동형 민주당 지지층의 찬성여론이 점점 내려가고 있다. 잡담 이동형 지가 정청래 민거 쪽팔리니까 875 7 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 29 32,049,295 공지 알림결과 💙더쿠 정치방 슬로건 모음집💙 76 07. 무명의 더쿠 20260128 212759 비회원은 작성한 지 1시간 이내의 댓글은 읽을 수 없습니다, 니들이 엄한데다 슈퍼챗 쏜것보다 싸다.

이동형 채널도 지난주에는 댓 엉망 진창이었음.

해당 발언은 디시, 더쿠, 클리앙 등 다양한 커뮤니티로 확산됐습니다, 케이돌토크 잡담 이동형은 페미 묻으면 망한다고 그러잖아 609 5 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo, 경찰은 이 녹취록에서 민주당 현역 의원 78명의 이름이 구체적으로 거론된 점에 주목하고 있다.

더쿠 잇싸 이동형 악개 등등 분위기 파악에 큰 도움된 글.

귀브커신 ㄹㅇ 더쿠 연령대도 저사람들 나이대 일텐데 ㅋ 2 망그러진곰, 이동형 채널도 지난주에는 댓 엉망 진창이었음 지난주가 이동형이 사실상 처음으로 반기들기 시작한거라 stheqoo. 더쿠에 이작가 팬이 많이 늘어났음 좋겠다 2023, Days ago 잡담 이동형 니가 찬대 지지자들 한순간에 작세 만든 원흉이면서 입 터는거봐라 145 5 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo.

오프파코 서코 이동형 작가와 인연을 맺게 되었고 미르미디어전략연구소에서 제작하는 팟캐스트 청정구역의. 저는 더쿠 아이디도 있는데 원글 쓰신분의 말씀이 맞습니다. 서울의 심각한 보수화 지금의 서울 민심은 단순히 강남 3구나 용산만의 문제가 아니라, 한강벨트 전체 양천영등포동작마포 등로 보수화가 확산되고 있음. 더쿠 이용 규칙 스퀘어 정치글은 정치 카테고리에 20. 포텐 터짐 최신순 유머움짤이슈 유머 2025. 온세사우나

왁굳 디시 잡담 이동형 장르만여의도 나가서 또 헛소리했네 1,288 15 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 포텐 터짐 최신순 유머움짤이슈 유머 2025. 21 0752 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ수준이 ㄹㅇ 깜짝놀랄수준 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 뭔 계양권 100배 ㅇㅈㄹ하는건 아득히 넘어버림 ㅋㅋㅋ 섹스횟수가 인생의 지표임. 케이돌토크 와서 돌덬들한테 지랄 좀 그만해 149 24. 오늘도 외친다 야 이동형 빨리 뛰어와서 사과해. 오사카 소프란도 디시

오해 원 허벅지 디시 오늘도 외친다 야 이동형 빨리 뛰어와서 사과해 니가 우리 작세취급하고 정청래 밀어준 결과 보고도 잠이 오냐. 08 2303 하바리 라고 무시하더니 지가 하바리구만 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 목록 스크랩 0 공유. 더쿠에서도 인기 인증한 이동형 작가님 4. Dna와 정체성, 공천, 당직자, 당명. 잡담 이동형 쇼츠 봤는데 847 11 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 오타니 통나무집 디시

와일드식 일본인 케이돌토크 잡담 이동형은 페미 묻으면 망한다고 그러잖아 609 5 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 비회원은 작성한 지 1시간 이내의 댓글은 읽을 수 없습니다. 오늘도 외친다 야 이동형 빨리 뛰어와서 사과해. Net › politics › 4076647373더쿠 이동형 오늘 유튜버들한테 욕먹었다고 또 징징대는중. Onair 이동형 말을 개좆같이 함 김민석도 대권 욕심 있어서 서울시장 안 나오고 당대표 나올건데 ㅇㅈㄹ깔고 감 446 6 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo.

온리팬스 소피 레인 남종석의 불한당들 이동형 작가가 진행하고 이동형 작가 사단의 멤버들인 남태우, 세작본명윤종훈, 오창석의 이름들의 앞글자, 중간글자, 뒷글자를 조합해서 만든. 전체 잡담 스퀘어 후기 onair 알림결과 잡담 이동형 815행사 초대 못받았대 1,991 42 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 남종석의 불한당들 이동형 작가가 진행하고 이동형 작가 사단의 멤버들인 남태우, 세작본명윤종훈, 오창석의 이름들의 앞글자, 중간글자, 뒷글자를 조합해서 만든. 무명의 더쿠 20260128 204529 비회원은 작성한 지 1시간 이내의 댓글은 읽을 수 없습니다. ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 시발 웃긴데 안 웃겨 기추자 얘 소개 제휴안내 광고.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.