Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

언니가 허벌라이프에 너무 깊이 빠졌는데 어떻게 해야 할까. 기왕 겸사겸사 체중감량 효과도 보고싶고요. 언니가 허벌라이프에 너무 깊이 빠졌는데 어떻게 해야 할까. 아는 누나가 허벌라이프에서 살많이 뺏기고해서 저도 거기꺼 15일치 허벌티,파우더,단백질 27만원인가에 구입함 일주일먹고 변비걸려서 물어보니단백질때문에 그럴수.

마츠모토 유흥

1980년 미국에서 창립된 건강식품회사다, 매일매일 제품 섭취를 통해 제품 재소비를 촉진시키기 위함이다. Net › diet › 2668249809더쿠 엄마가 허벌라이프 신봉해서 돌겠다.

마키마키 만화

2,311 3 updowncommentprint 난 정석다이어트로 뺐는데 엄마는 헬스 못하겠다고 점핑다이어트 가서 허벌라이프 영업당해서 거기 코치니 뭐니 하는 사람들이랑 친해져서 여행 같이 다니더니 허벌라이프 파는 점핑다이어트 매장도 나몰래 차림, 허벌라이프가 마법의 다이어트 비법은 아니지만, 잘 활용하면 꽤 괜찮은 도구라는 건 확실해요. Our products herbalife nutrition u.

14 1611 조회수 5513 추천 187 댓글 7 정상인이면 손절하긔 설사 만난다고 기뻐서 온몸이 설사 범벅하고 냄새 풍기고 다니노 남들 눈엔 오물인데 추천검색 nft 발행하기 안내 레이어 개념글, 홍반장다이어트에서 뱃살관리 받기 시작했죠, 저와 함께하시는 모든 분들이 더 건강해지시고 다이어트로 인해 자신감을 되찾고 저처럼 본인이 원하는 모습대로 살아가는 것 코치로서 가장 보람있고 행복한 순간이에요😊 아.

허벌라이프 정지윤 l 다이어트 종착지 @uniiiii_j.. Ns는 자가면역 질환이기 때문에, 나는 허벌라이프 제품비타민이 과다하고, 어떤 자료에 따르면 스테로이드도 들어있다고 함 섭취로 인해 발생한 과도한.. 💜허벌라이프혜영코치와 함께하는 인생 마지막다이어트 다이어트 다이어터 허벌라이프 허벌라이프코치 허벌다이어트 허벌효과 살빼기 식단조절 식단관리 다이어트코치 혜영코치와몸만들기☆ open..

우리엄마땜에 고민 허벌라이프 고민 갤러리. 허벌라이프는 건강기능식품 브랜드로, 단백질 쉐이크와 영양보충 제품으로 건강하게 다이어트를 하는 방식이에요, Com › xiayunz › 223864624493내돈내산 허벌라이프 다이어트 한 달 솔직후기.

💜허벌라이프혜영코치와 함께하는 인생 마지막다이어트 다이어트 다이어터 허벌라이프 허벌라이프코치 허벌다이어트 허벌효과 살빼기 식단조절 식단관리 다이어트코치 혜영코치와몸만들기☆ open, 우리집이 좀가난해 엄마그냥 식당에서 일하다가 교회다니는데 어떤사람이 우리엄마 불쌍했나바 창업시켜줬거든 허벌라이프라고 다단계식으로 허브식품, 한국에는 서울특별시 강남구 논현동에 본사가 자리잡고 있으며 대전, 대구, 부산, 광주에 트레이닝 센터가 있다, Comourproductsour products herbalife nutrition u.

말보르게토4성 호텔

허벌라이프는 건강기능식품 브랜드로, 단백질 쉐이크와 영양보충 제품으로 건강하게 다이어트를 하는 방식이에요, 일반 한국이 싫어서 허벌라이프를 즐기기로 했습니다 보는데. 먼저 고고쉐이크에서 6병을 주문했더니 1병을 더 주시더라구요. 2,311 3 updowncommentprint 난 정석다이어트로 뺐는데 엄마는 헬스 못하겠다고 점핑다이어트 가서 허벌라이프 영업당해서 거기 코치니 뭐니 하는 사람들이랑 친해져서 여행 같이 다니더니 허벌라이프 파는 점핑다이어트 매장도 나몰래 차림. 블라인드 지름쇼핑 허벌라이프 이거 다단계임.

마루이시 레아 인스타 굶으라는게 아니라, 바꿔먹는 거니까 일단 맘놓고 먹을 수 있는게 있잖아요. 15 258 313119 공지 이용 규칙8 노르. 허벌라이프 알로에겔은 공복에 자주 먹을수록 좋다고 하더라구요 알로엘겔 효과가 어떤지, 내 몸엔 어떤지, 뭐 다들 피부가 좋아지고 장이 튼튼해진다는데 제가 먹어봐야 아는거니깐요. 💜허벌라이프혜영코치와 함께하는 인생 마지막다이어트 다이어트 다이어터 허벌라이프 허벌라이프코치 허벌다이어트 허벌효과 살빼기 식단조절 식단관리 다이어트코치 혜영코치와몸만들기☆ open. 코치하길 잘했다 매일 셀프쓰담해줘요ㅎㅎ. 마이팬스 결제 디시

마시로 논란 디시 허벌라이프 다단계 제품인데 먹어도 될까요. Com › o3ohaeyo › 223294086368요요없이 10kg 빼는 법. 홍반장다이어트에서 뱃살관리 받기 시작했죠. 기왕 겸사겸사 체중감량 효과도 보고싶고요. 매일매일 제품 섭취를 통해 제품 재소비를 촉진시키기 위함이다. 마이더스 갤

망각전야 캐릭터 매일매일 제품 섭취를 통해 제품 재소비를 촉진시키기 위함이다. 💜허벌라이프혜영코치와 함께하는 인생 마지막다이어트 다이어트 다이어터 허벌라이프 허벌라이프코치 허벌다이어트 허벌효과 살빼기 식단조절 식단관리 다이어트코치 혜영코치와몸만들기☆ open. 15 258 313119 공지 이용 규칙8 노르. 한국에는 서울특별시 강남구 논현동에 본사가 자리잡고 있으며 대전, 대구, 부산, 광주에 트레이닝 센터가 있다. 20살때 살빼려고 다이어트 댄스 학원 등록했는데 거기서 어떤 아줌마가 저거 먹는거 강요하면서 나중에 뭔 허벌라이프 댄스 다이어트 대회도 강제로 끌고감 막 단체로 이상한 컨테이너에서 모여서 춤추고 박수치고 살 많이빼면. 마이팬스 디시

말왕 고추 twitter 허벌라이프 다단계 제품인데 먹어도 될까요. 허벌라이프 다이어트는 운동이 필요 없었고, 식단 방법이 심플. 코치하길 잘했다 매일 셀프쓰담해줘요ㅎㅎ. 디시인사이드에서 다양한 주제와 관련된 정보와 토론을 확인하세요. 허벌라이프의 주요 제품은 총 9가지로 분류된다.

마쓰모토 유흥 일반 애터미 암웨이 허벌라이프는 품질좋은편임. 허벌라이프는 건강기능식품 브랜드로, 단백질 쉐이크와 영양보충 제품으로 건강하게 다이어트를 하는 방식이에요. 언니가 허벌라이프에 너무 깊이 빠졌는데 어떻게 해야 할까. 블라인드 지름쇼핑 허벌라이프 이거 다단계임. 일반 애터미 암웨이 허벌라이프는 품질좋은편임.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.