Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Ofje608 越可愛臉部越刺激，60位絕色美女，共101張海量臉部。 一個甜美又殘暴的蕩婦，喜歡舔和吸。佐佐木咲 20613. Net › av%e5%a5%b3%e5%84%aa › %e4%bd%90%e4佐佐木紗希 佐々木さきav界的治癒系 youtuber 清純外表 × 反差魅力. 佐佐木紗希saki sasaki佐々木さき. 佐佐木紗希 佐々木さき的instagram與推特 4.

以下內容轉自網路 雖然楓カレン楓花戀以救世主之姿回歸，但別忘了ip社還有新人出道！ 她叫佐々木さき佐佐木紗希，不暪你說，第一眼看到封面時我的感覺是「這根本天海つ ばさ天海翼的親妹妹」、兩.. Live › search › 佐佐木紗希佐佐木紗希的搜尋結果 missav 免費高清av在線看..

나가하마 소프랜드

Vip › actress › 佐佐木紗希佐佐木紗希 出演作品 avday 亞洲最大a片網.. 💖 不只拍 av，還是超有趣的 youtuber，日常互動感滿分！ 🎥 如果你喜歡 「鄰家女友型」+「性感尤物」， 又愛看 反差萌，那麼 佐佐木紗希 絕對是你 不容錯過的女神！ 🔥 3.. 過濾 所有 佐佐木咲小惡魔的奇蹟 12930 mbdd2165 佐佐木咲小惡魔的奇蹟 一名慣犯說.. Tv › models › cb98e5f74293c9e839b092431909de17佐々木さき 出演的av在線看 jable..

김상민 여자친구 인스타

Com › main › model佐々木さき ggjav 最齊全的免費線上av，線上a片，高清日本av，線. Contribute to luoliphysicstvbox development by creating an account on github, Ofje608 越可愛臉部越刺激，60位絕色美女，共101張海量臉部。 一個甜美又殘暴的蕩婦，喜歡舔和吸。佐佐木咲 20613. Ipzz709 身為偶像的頂級粉絲，在偶像引退後收到她私訊邀約。 被戀愛禁令束縛三年的她，展現出熱烈而親密的愛意，共度兩天愛愛時光 佐佐木紗希 394 990 3627 20255, 当時は中型（普通）自動二輪に乗っていたが、その後、大型二輪免許も取得。 av引退後にバイク雑誌『チャンプu』にコーナーを持ち、自作の 漫画 を含め連載した。 活動休止後、2024年時点でもsnsにおいて活動を継続している。.

김지연 정철원 디시

까발로 런닝화 디시

📍endereço 8225 vineland ave, espaço 2091, orlando, fl 32821 orlando dicasdeorlando florida hi, 经典番号推荐 —— 深受用户喜爱的女优和影片经典番号都在这里, Asbest2 serie fy set momoakaxidir mhaworldheroesmissionhdlivewallpapersáp nhập cấp xã phụ huynh, Org › zhtw › 佐佐木希佐佐木希 維基百科，自由的百科全書. 佐々木さき出演的av 在線看 missav.

김채연 야동 📍endereço 8225 vineland ave, espaço 2091, orlando, fl 32821 orlando dicasdeorlando florida hi. Ipzz163 新人 first impression 164 害羞妹子喜歡做愛！ 乳頭有感過頭的新世代偶像美少女av出道 佐佐木紗希 2525 100% 流暢播放. Original sound nukuu ya leo. 佐々木さき（ささきさき）av女優プロフィール みんなのav. Com › actresses › 佐々木さき佐々木さき出演的 av 在線看 njav 免費高清av在線看. 나실알

김유정 leaked Cc › ptt › japanavgirls閒聊 ip社的次世代美少女偶像佐佐木紗希 japanavgirls板 disp. Tv › models › cb98e5f74293c9e839b092431909de17佐々木さき 出演的av在線看 jable. 22923 sone353 剧烈高潮340次金松季歩 18 30034 1023 15427 ipzz446 出差遇到創紀錄的暴雨佐佐木紗希 23 34052 1023 4113 精东影业jdxyx005同城约会学生妹 41 54495 0823. 6月に「麻生希 av debut」で sodクリエイト からavデビュー 2。 同年6月29日、7月5日に行う 顔射 解禁ロケの 汁男優 20人の公募がav監督の新保英之により行われた 10。 2012年6月、 中国 で仕事をし、それがきっかけで 新浪微博 のアカウントも作っていた 11。. Av女優の名前が知りたい！ 本館 シロウト女優、キカタン（企画単体）av女優名のまとめサイト. 나의 서포터즈 아카데미아

나히아 하가쿠레 Live › search › 佐佐木紗希佐佐木紗希的搜尋結果 missav 免費高清av在線看. Смотрите онлайн ipzz641 fhd umr 2025 saki sasaki от автора japanese av umr r18. 佐々木さきささきさきのエロ動画一覧！ 佐々木さきささきさきのエロ動画を24時間更新！エロビデオネットは佐々木さきささきさきのエロ動画を簡単検索できます。. Cc › ptt › japanavgirls閒聊 ip社的次世代美少女偶像佐佐木紗希 japanavgirls板 disp. Net › av%e5%a5%b3%e5%84%aa › %e4%bd%90%e4佐佐木紗希 佐々木さきav界的治癒系 youtuber 清純外表 × 反差魅力. 김연아 고우림 더쿠

나기 히카루 노모 Juq770 渴望被戴绿帽子的老公実浜みき 48 47845 0814. Contribute to limbopronsfw development by creating an account on github. 佐佐木紗希saki sasaki佐々木さき. 佐々木さき出演的av 在線看 missav. Tv › models › cb98e5f74293c9e839b092431909de17佐々木さき 出演的av在線看 jable.

김우유 ㄲㅈ 22923 sone353 剧烈高潮340次金松季歩 18 30034 1023 15427 ipzz446 出差遇到創紀錄的暴雨佐佐木紗希 23 34052 1023 4113 精东影业jdxyx005同城约会学生妹 41 54495 0823. Com › main › model佐々木さき ggjav 最齊全的免費線上av，線上a片，高清日本av，線. Live › search › 佐佐木紗希佐佐木紗希的搜尋結果 missav 免費高清av在線看. Contribute to limbopronsfw development by creating an account on github. 💖 不只拍 av，還是超有趣的 youtuber，日常互動感滿分！ 🎥 如果你喜歡 「鄰家女友型」+「性感尤物」， 又愛看 反差萌，那麼 佐佐木紗希 絕對是你 不容錯過的女神！ 🔥 3.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.