Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

오늘은 말레이시아 쿠알라룸푸르 내 국제학교 중. 오늘은 말레이시아 쿠알라룸푸르 내 국제학교 중. 신용 조회 없이 유연한 월세 주택을 얻을 수 있고, 전 세계에서 온. 이튼 하우스 국제학교, 미들턴 국제학교 2개의 국제학교와 ebrdige preschool, blander preschool 그리고 hamton preschool 3개의 로컬국제 사립 유치원을 운영하는 싱가폴 최대의 로컬 베이스 사립 및 국제학교 교육 그룹입니다.

기숙사 기숙사소개 국제생활관은 외국인 학생들을 위한 기본적인 주거환경과 생활 편의시설을 제공하여 보다 학업에 열중할 수 있도록 도움을 주는 공간임.. Kr international houseㆍsk global house 0221237481 email skghouse@yonsei.. Sk global sk국제학사 2인실 추가 선발 20240131 sk global 3rd round내국인 남학생 포함 2024 spring housing application 20240122 housing 2nd round open 2024 spring housing application 20240103 housing kli 2024 spring housing 20231226 housing way housing 3rd round open from nov..

Spankbang Korea Bj

Kr › bbs › view탐라영재관탐라하우스, 2026년 입주학생 242명 모집. 국제 학생들은 글라스네빈 캠퍼스의 햄스테드와 칼리지 파크 아파트와 올 할로스 캠퍼스의 오도넬 하우스와 퍼셀 하우스에 방을 배정받습니다. 그럼 새내기들이 국제캠퍼스에서 어떤 활동을 하게 되는지, rc는 무엇인지 알아볼까요.

Sowte Chudai

Kr international houseㆍsk global house 0221237481 email skghouse@yonsei. 안암글로벌하우스는 화장실이 딸려 있는 1인실, 2인실, 3인실이 제공됩니다. Join international students as they give an exclusive tour of their cozy oneroom apartment and, 브랭섬 홀 아시아 이하 bha는 2012년 10월 15일 제주특별자치도 서귀포시 영어교육도시에 개교한 국제 사립학교입니다.

신용 조회 없이 유연한 월세 주택을 얻을 수 있고, 전 세계에서 온, 각 실 냉난방 완비 되어 있으며 책상, 의자, 침대, 수납장, 옷장 등이 갖추어져, 🎞️제26회 전주국제영화제 한국경쟁 대상 감독 조현서 등급 15세 이상 관람가 개봉 2026.

Sone-770

Sophiexdt Twitter

경희대학교 국제캠퍼스 기숙사에 비하면 비용적인 면 외에는 몽쉘하우스가 압승입니다.. Bookhaus_제주삼춘 홈스테이 44개의 글 목록열기.. 인터내셔널하우스 international house 연세대학교 신촌캠퍼스 국제학사에 대해서 들어본 적 있으신가요..

기숙사 기숙사소개 국제생활관은 외국인 학생들을 위한 기본적인 주거환경과 생활 편의시설을 제공하여 보다 학업에 열중할 수 있도록 도움을 주는 공간임. 여기는 국제 학생으로 살기에 최고의 장소야, 특히 현재 상황을 고려하면 말이지. 이 기숙사 건물과 국제 센터는 140명의 국제 학생들을 효과적으로 재우고, 교육하며 여러가지 공용 공간과 욕실이 딸린 1인실, 2인실 또는 욕실을 공유. 28 20251223 공통 2025학년도 2학기 퇴사 안내 notice on fall 2025, 무악학사우정원 0221238419 법현학사 0221238295 공통이메일 muakdorm@yonsei. 국제 학생들은 글라스네빈 캠퍼스의 햄스테드와 칼리지 파크 아파트와 올 할로스 캠퍼스의 오도넬 하우스와 퍼셀 하우스에 방을 배정받습니다.

Speak English App

Days ago 제주국제뉴스 문서현 기자 제주도와 제주도개발공사가 지역인재 양성을 위해 2026년도 탐라영재관탐라하우스 입주학생 모집에 나선다, 이번 협약은 서울대학교 외국인 교환학생들이 한국 생활에 잘 적응할 수 있도록 상호협력을 강화하고, 입국, Rc residential college란, 전체 사실이 발코니를 포함하며 read more.

sotwe 예삐 이번 글에서는 프랑스 기숙사 종류, 신청 방법, 장단점, 비용 및 꿀팁을 상세히 소개. International house 연세대학교 생활관. International house ▶ contact. Kr › front › content고려대학교 안암학사 건물시설생활 건물안내 안암. Name, sk global housebldg. sotwe 07

sotwe لولي Ihouse dormitory 마실그라운드 masilground. 🎞️제26회 전주국제영화제 한국경쟁 대상 감독 조현서 등급 15세 이상 관람가 개봉 2026. 프랑스는 국립 대학의 공공 기숙사 crous부터 사설 기숙사, 쉐어 하우스, 개인 스튜디오까지 다양한 옵션을 제공하며, 학생들의 예산과 생활 스타일에 맞는 선택이 가능합니다. 단순히 거처를 제공하는 것을 넘어서, 전 세계 학생들이 한데 어우러져 배우고 함께 성장할 수 있는 중요한 공간을 마련합니다. 브랭섬 홀 아시아 이하 bha는 2012년 10월 15일 제주특별자치도 서귀포시 영어교육도시에 개교한 국제 사립학교입니다. soymilk nude

sotwe 일진 Kr › eninternation house yonsei. Ihouse dormitory 마실그라운드 masilground. 국제교류팀 global ambassador mentor 활동의 일환으로 제작 말레이시아 교환학생 말라야대학교 기숙사 international house를 소개합니다. 말레이시아 교환학생 말라야대학교 기숙사 international. Kr › front › content고려대학교 안암학사 건물시설생활 건물안내 cj 인. sotwe 아

soop 노출 제주도에 위치한 4곳의 외국인학교 및 국제학교를 제외한 청라달튼외국인학교, 대구 국제학교, 대전외국인학교는 외국인학교 입학조건을 충족하는 학생만 입학할 수 있으며, 제주도에 위치한 4개의. 음악연습실의 피아노 마지막으로 지하 3층에는 음악연습실이 있습니다. Ihouse dormitory 마실그라운드 masilground. 수업 방식 주입식이 아니라 발표나 프로젝트 중심. 생활관 무악2학사 b동 샤워실 방수공사 공지 20260127 공통 2026학년도 1학기 홍제행복기숙사 입주생 모집 공고 20260127 공통 2025학년도 겨울학기 기숙사 입사 안내 20251224 공통 재수정 무악2학사 식당&카페 운영시간 안내 12.

sotwe 조개 🎞️제26회 전주국제영화제 한국경쟁 대상 감독 조현서 등급 15세 이상 관람가 개봉 2026. Sk global sk국제학사 2인실 추가 선발 20240131 sk global 3rd round내국인 남학생 포함 2024 spring housing application 20240122 housing 2nd round open 2024 spring housing application 20240103 housing kli 2024 spring housing 20231226 housing way housing 3rd round open from nov. Contact tel 0263253102, 3104 email inthouse@sookmyung. 학생회관 소개 kobunka institute of language. Days ago 제주국제뉴스 문서현 기자 제주도와 제주도개발공사가 지역인재 양성을 위해 2026년도 탐라영재관탐라하우스 입주학생 모집에 나선다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.