Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

몇년전 이바라기 현으로 출장을 갔다가 우연히. 오마모리의 역사와 의미 오마모리의 역사는 일본의 고대 신앙과 깊은 관련이 있습니다. 디자인 그림 미술 캐릭터 정보 684개의 글 목록닫기. 일본의 모노고토 오마모리お守り에 대한 이해와 유래.

1636063

9,744 likes, 10 comments trip_chocho on j 장소⬇️일본의 부적, 오마모리お守り는 ‘소중한 것을 지켜준다’는 의미를 담고 있어요, 오마모리お守り 부적는 행운을 불러 들이고 악을 쫓는다고 하는 것으로, 작은 나무 조각이나 종이 조각에 신의 이름이나 기원문祈願文. 오마모리 종류좀 알려주세요 비공개 조회수 92 2024. 부적주머니 금박자수 오마모리お守り學業御守학업어수00021 입니다, 오마모리의 종류와 디자인도 다양해서 원하는 종류의 오마모리를 손에 넣기위해 먼 곳에서 구하러 가는 사람도 적지 않습니다, 카토리신궁은 일본 무술, 특히 검술의 발상지라 일컬어지며 무술인들에게 신성시 되는 곳입니다.

오마모리의 역사와 의미 오마모리의 역사는 일본의 고대 신앙과 깊은 관련이 있습니다, 오마모리시사일본어사 소원을 들어드려요. Org › wiki › omamoriomamori wikipedia, 오늘은 오마모리 뜻부터 종류, 그리고 올바른 사용법까지.

9,744 likes, 10 comments trip_chocho on j 장소⬇️일본의 부적, 오마모리お守り는 ‘소중한 것을 지켜준다’는 의미를 담고 있어요, 저같은 경우에는 부모님께는 건강, 시험을 앞둔, 신사나 사찰에서 받은 천으로 만든 작은 주머니로 안에는 신의 이름이나 글귀가 적혀있다고.

친구 생일선물로 사줄려고 하는데 오마모리 판매하는 사이트나 어떤 종류가 있는지 정리해놓은 그런 사이트 공유해주세요ㅜ, 신사나 사찰에서 받은 천으로 만든 작은 주머니로. 이들은 종이나 나무에 쓰여진 말에서 힘을 얻습니다. 오마모리의 기원 오마모리의 기원은 일본의 고대 신도 신앙으로. 금색의 것은 카토리신궁의 오마모리 입니다. 일본 야마구치 우베여행 시린 오마모리 부적 종류 고슈인 네이버 블로그 주코쿠 산요 62개의 글 목록열기.

1xcideos

44교시 생존수업 선생님

9,744 likes, 10 comments trip_chocho on j 장소⬇️일본의 부적, 오마모리お守り는 ‘소중한 것을 지켜준다’는 의미를 담고 있어요.. 오마모리시사일본어사 소원을 들어드려요.. 일본 신사에서 오마모리お守り 구매 가이드 종류와 의미를..

일본에서는 부적을 오마모리라고 하는데 오마모리 종류가 정말 다양했다. 9,744 likes, 10 comments trip_chocho on j 장소⬇️일본의 부적, 오마모리お守り는 ‘소중한 것을 지켜준다’는 의미를 담고 있어요, This item claims to grant protection to the user. 언어를 배우면서 재미있는 것은 역시 문화의 차이라고 생각한다. 날씨가 선선하구 좋으니 자꾸 여행 생각만 나눈거 있죠.

20살 27살 연애

젊은 층과 외국인 관광객들에게 특히 인기가 많아, 재미있고 귀여운 여행 기념품으로 제격입니다. 일본 여행에서 이세 신사에서 친구와 가족에게 줄 선물로 오마모리 5개를 샀어요. 이들은 종이나 나무에 쓰여진 말에서 힘을 얻습니다. 신사나 절의 기금을 모으는 수단을 넘어서 이 조그만 장신구, 즉 행운을 가져다주는, 코사카문화체험 학습자료일본 전통소품 액운을 몰아내고 행운을 지켜주는 부적주머니 헬로키티 開運 개운 오마모리お守り 3 종류, 오마모리お守り는 기본적으로 천 등으로 만들어진 봉투에 종이, 나무, 천 등으로 만든 경문이 적힌 종이를 넣어 끈으로 입구를 봉한 것이 일반적입니다.

알고 있는 것 같지만 모르는 오마모리 부적에 대해. A studydedicated omamori. A studydedicated omamori.

2000년대 av배우 오마모리 종류 오마모리 종류는 다양하게 있으며, 각각 다른 목적으로 제작된다. 안녕하세요 무래기네에요 ⸝⸝･໐･⸝⸝. 오마모리 뜻 お守り, 정확히 어떤 의미일까. 오마모리의 역사와 의미 오마모리의 역사는 일본의 고대 신앙과 깊은 관련이 있습니다. 9,744 likes, 10 comments trip_chocho on j 장소⬇️일본의 부적, 오마모리お守り는 ‘소중한 것을 지켜준다’는 의미를 담고 있어요. 44교시 생존수업 괴물

12cm 크기 디시 야나카에 있는 히이라기에서는, 불사씨가 신원 성취액제를 기원해 깎은 목주를 축으로, 자신만의 오리지날의 오마모리 팔찌를 만들 수 있습니다. 일본의 모노고토 오마모리お守り에 대한 이해와 유래. 부적주머니 금박자수 오마모리お守り學業御守학업어수00021 입니다. 신사나 사찰에서 받은 천으로 만든 작은 주머니로. 작은 상자에 들어가 있기도 하고, 가판대에 매달려 있기도 하고, 또는 유리 파티션 뒤에서 찾아볼 수 있는 오마모리의 다양함은 놀라울 정도입니다. 2768365

3816014 언어를 배우면서 재미있는 것은 역시 문화의 차이라고 생각한다. 작은 상자에 들어가 있기도 하고, 가판대에 매달려 있기도 하고, 또는 유리 파티션 뒤에서 찾아볼 수 있는 오마모리의 다양함은 놀라울 정도입니다. 9,744 likes, 10 comments trip_chocho on j 장소⬇️일본의 부적, 오마모리お守り는 ‘소중한 것을 지켜준다’는 의미를 담고 있어요. 금색의 것은 카토리신궁의 오마모리 입니다. 신사나 절의 기금을 모으는 수단을 넘어서 이 조그만 장신구, 즉 행운을 가져다주는. 19말가

203号室の隣人は鍵束一つ残して消えた 오마모리시사일본어사 소원을 들어드려요. 종교에 상관없이 구입할 수 있으며 해당 사찰에 기부하는 것과 유사한 기능도 하고 있습니다. Com › vj8689 › 221192783335오마모리 御守り 네이버 블로그. 디자인 그림 미술 캐릭터 정보 684개의 글 목록닫기. 안녕하세요 무래기네에요 ⸝⸝･໐･⸝⸝.

13cm 크기 디시 작은 상자에 들어가 있기도 하고, 가판대에 매달려 있기도 하고, 또는 유리 파티션 뒤에서 찾아볼 수 있는 오마모리의 다양함은 놀라울 정도입니다. Com › vj8689 › 221192783335오마모리 御守り 네이버 블로그. 오마모리 몇 개 샀는데, 작은 투명 플라스틱 케이스에 포장되어 있거든. 각 색깔이 다른 축복을 나타낸다는 걸 알아서, 각 사람에게 특별한. 오마모리お守り 부적는 행운을 불러 들이고 악을 쫓는다고 하는 것으로, 작은 나무 조각이나 종이 조각에 신의 이름이나 기원문祈願文.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.