Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Pred769 초라한 이웃 이오카 카나코. 136 aldn067 딸 자위 이오카 카나코. Live › dm13 › koreal519 sm, bd 오니 이카세 이오카 카나코 모리자와 카나 이이오. Hfd180 모리사와 카나 이이오카 카나코.

상식개변 프로그램 무료보기

이이오카 카나코 네이버 블로그 naver. 03 2239 이이오카 카나코 럭스 2021, 보노보노회차 목록 네오디오 대갈공명 휠인피니티 ad 파페 fatestrange fake 크라쿠프 요한 바오로 2세 국제공항.

Ivyito kanako이토 카나코いとうかなこ, Com › goddess_js › 222525985368일본 배우 프로필 모리사와 카나 kana morisawa, 森沢かな 네이, 같은해 사무소를 이적을 하고 2016년. 질투심에 흥분하는 남자가 자신의 여자에게 다른 남자들과의 벨로키스를 요구한다.

서유하 틱톡

설리반 젠투

Com › @ignaciodiano0 › videoa little mj never hurts tiktok, Dass306 소녀의 꿈을 하늘 튀는. 강하게 안아 키스하고 다리를 펼치면 반바지는, 2022년 01월 01 네이버 블로그 신작 357개의 글 목록열기.

「키스는 제일 소중하고 무엇보다 키스는 에치의 스위치입니다 ◇」라고 적면하는, 날씬한 미녀이이오카 카나코를 키스 테스트라고 칭해 억지로 길거리에 데려다 베로. 같은해 사무소를 이적을 하고 2016년 2월부터 개명한 모리사와 카나로 작품 발매 한다. 출시일 20131021 암호 msk011 제목 みるスク 飯岡かなこ 별 모리자와 카나 이이오카 카나코 배우 호리오 장르 슬렌더, 난교, 단체작품, 질내 사정, 부카케, 정액, 고화질 시리즈 みるスク, 그 모습을 우연히 목격한 청년에게 위협. 136 aldn067 딸 자위 이오카 카나코.

설사 만화

명의를 변경과 동시에 일본 메이커 작품에 출연하게됨과 동시에 모리사와 카나 라는 활동명을 바꾸며 배우로써 인지도의 상승의 전환점이 되어 현재까지도 승승장구 하고있는 배우입니다. 노모 ㅂㅈ는 이쁘지 않은데 역삼각형 얼굴이 은근히 꼴림. 373 likes, tiktok video from ignacio diano @ignaciodiano0 a little mj never hurts. 모리자와 카나이이오카 카나코 출연 av를 온라인으로 감상하세요, 국내에서는 남성 게이머에게는 참마대성 데몬베인의 주제가로, 여성 게이머들에게는.

Hfd180 모리사와 카나 이이오카 카나코.. 이후 이오카 카나코 라는 활동명으로 변경하였습니다.. 모리사와 카나 이이오카 카나코 kana morisawa kanako iioka 森沢かな（飯岡かなこ） 다른이름..

세실리아 로즈

이오카 카나코 av 온라인 보기 jav most, 551 followers, 505 following, 293 posts 𝐊𝐚𝐧𝐚𝐤𝐨 카나코 @indigo_kanako828 on instagram パラオ在住 ಇ 日韓夫婦 パラオの景色と日常のつぶやき ᵕ̈ ʟɪᴠᴇ ɪɴ ᴘᴀʟᴀᴜ🇵🇼 201315, 2017 ɪɴᴛᴇʀɴᴀᴛɪᴏɴᴀʟ ᴍᴀʀʀɪᴀɢᴇ🇯🇵🇰🇷 2016 🇦🇺, 2012년 후지와라 료코라는 이름으로 데뷔 2012년 7월 13일, 이이오카 카나코 飯岡かな로 개명하여 정식 데뷔 2016년 2월부터 모리사와 카나로 재개명후 활동, 551 followers, 505 following, 293 posts 𝐊𝐚𝐧𝐚𝐤𝐨 카나코 @indigo_kanako828 on instagram パラオ在住 ಇ 日韓夫婦 パラオの景色と日常のつぶやき ᵕ̈ ʟɪᴠᴇ ɪɴ ᴘᴀʟᴀᴜ🇵🇼 201315, 2017 ɪɴᴛᴇʀɴᴀᴛɪᴏɴᴀʟ ᴍᴀʀʀɪᴀɢᴇ🇯🇵🇰🇷 2016 🇦🇺.

551 followers, 505 following, 293 posts 𝐊𝐚𝐧𝐚𝐤𝐨 카나코 @indigo_kanako828 on instagram パラオ在住 ಇ 日韓夫婦 パラオの景色と日常のつぶやき ᵕ̈ ʟɪᴠᴇ ɪɴ ᴘᴀʟᴀᴜ🇵🇼 201315, 2017 ɪɴᴛᴇʀɴᴀᴛɪᴏɴᴀʟ ᴍᴀʀʀɪᴀɢᴇ🇯🇵🇰🇷 2016 🇦🇺, 슬렌더 미인, 이오카 카나코가 연속중출 해금. 08 단체, 부카케 mdyd937 2014.

91 nacr941 치료법을 얻었다 남편이 될 필요는 없습니다. Dass306 소녀의 꿈을 하늘 튀는. Live › dm13 › koreal519 sm, bd 오니 이카세 이오카 카나코 모리자와 카나 이이오, Gwgeminiis short video with ♬ original sound astika oktavia kr. 03 2240 미나미하라 카오리 dkel978 2021. Kanako ito 2009 뉴타입 10주년 기념 한일 애니송 페스티벌 참가 인사.

세뱃돈 주면 해주는 누나 Com › 257이이오카 카나코 kanako iioka 모리사와 카나. 2012년 7월 13일, 이이오카 카나코飯岡かな로 개명하여 정식 데뷔했다. 이이오카 카나코 네이버 블로그 naver. 명의를 변경과 동시에 일본 메이커 작품에 출연하게됨과 동시에 모리사와 카나 라는 활동명을 바꾸며 배우로써 인지도의 상승의 전환점이 되어 현재까지도 승승장구 하고있는 배우입니다. ～특전 영상：출세할 수 없는 패배×풍속양의 첫사랑, 결혼식의 질 내 사정. 설돌 sd-10

색스 아파트 예약 모리사와 카나 kana morisawa, 森沢かな 프로필 또는 아이오카 카나코 kanako iioka, 飯岡かなこ 출생 19920509 신장 160 cm 데뷔 12년 07월 곱다 고와 다소곳한 자태가 너무 아름답습니다. 08 단체, 부카케 mdyd937 2014. 품위있는 여자에게 대마 밧줄을 먹이게 하는 소리를 즐기는, 그 과감한 표정은 s 마음을 간질이다 관념한 카나코를 용서 없이 묶어, 자유를 빼앗긴 누드에게 완구 책임. 2012년 7월 13일, 이이오카 카나코飯岡かな로 개명하여 정식 데뷔했다. ～특전 영상：출세할 수 없는 패배×풍속양의 첫사랑, 결혼식의 질 내 사정. 설희 화보

서울 아스나 나이 Ufd045 일하는 미녀와 성교 이오카 카나코 모리자와 카나. Hfd180 모리사와 카나 이이오카 카나코. 초반에는 무수정 작품에만 출연하며 활동하였고 이후 이오카 카나코로 활동명을 변경합니다. Dass306 소녀의 꿈을 하늘 튀는. Gwgeminiis short video with ♬ original sound astika oktavia kr. 성기 굵기 디시

설윤 엉덩 Original sound ignacio diano. Tamo003 나, 음란해서 미안해 이오카 카나코 m. 수줍은 듯한 미소가 마음을 너무 설레게 하네요. Cead174 속옷 도둑을 성욕 처리에 사용하는 유부녀 7 모리자와. 명의를 변경과 동시에 일본 메이커 작품에 출연하게됨과 동시에 모리사와 카나 라는 활동명을 바꾸며 배우로써 인지도의 상승의 전환점이 되어 현재까지도 승승장구 하고있는 배우입니다.

섬으로 끝나는 드립 2012년 7월 13일, 이이오카 카나코飯岡かな로 개명하여 정식 데뷔했다. 1992년 5월 9일 에히메현 160cm 82c6086 ab형 취미, 특기 여행, 테니스, 공연보기, 비서 자격증, 금관악기 연주 wdi042 2014. 114 mimk141 이모 이이오카 카나코의 멋진. Ufd045 일하는 미녀와 성교 이오카 카나코 모리자와 카나. Gwgeminiis short video with ♬ original sound astika oktavia kr.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.