Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

9세 6세 엄청 잘가지고 놉니다 ㅋㅋㅋ 맥포머스보다 훨 괜찮은듯 자석블럭이라 만들기 쉽고 냉장고나 칠판에 붙어서 이렇게 저렇게 잘 갖고놈 사실 작년에도 사줬는데 한두개씩 잃어버려서 다시삼 ㅜ. 반짝반짝 달님이에서 이번에 출시한 신제품. 반지 목걸이 팔지 등등 반짝이는 거면 다 좋아해요. 아이마다 성향이 다를 수 있겠으나 제가 아는 지인의 여아들은 산니요, 카카오프랜즈 시리즈의 캐릭터 관련 용품을 선호하는 것 같았습니다.

Mib Korean Porn

어린이날 선물이고민됩니다 여아9세 선물좀 추천부탁드립니다.. 912개월 시기의 아기 장난감 총정리..

보드게임 〰 이렇게 학령전기, 만 6세부터 9세 아이들의 발달특징과 놀이에 대해서 이야기해 보았어요, 제품 하단에 상품가격비교 및 구매평보기 누르시면 자세한 리뷰 구매후기 보실수 있을거예요, 무한 블태기라, 일상 글을 올리는 건 진짜 오랜만인 것 같아요. 오늘은 4세, 5세, 6세 장난감 소개해 드릴게요. 그냥 일반적인 보석함에 가격이 좀 더 싸므로 애들용 쥬얼리 사서 넣어주셔도 됩니다.

Midv-176 자막

이 부분에 대해서는 차근히 설명해 드릴게요, 오늘은 4세, 5세, 6세 장난감 소개해 드릴게요. 1 7세여아장난감 diy 레진아트 키링만들기 생일. 9살장난감 에 대한 검색결과 연관검색어 8세여아장난감 초등여아장난감 여아장난감 여아장난감9세 9살선물 여아선물8세 여아장남감9세 조카선물8살 여자장난감 장난감 배송비 포함 쿠팡 랭킹순 쿠팡 랭킹순은 판매 실적, 고객 선호도, 상품 경쟁력 및. 오늘은 만 9세부터 12세 아동, 즉 10대초기에 해당하는 초등고학년 아이들의 발달특징과 장난감추천을 해 드릴 거예요. 9세 6세 엄청 잘가지고 놉니다 ㅋㅋㅋ 맥포머스보다 훨 괜찮은듯 자석블럭이라 만들기 쉽고 냉장고나 칠판에 붙어서 이렇게 저렇게 잘 갖고놈 사실 작년에도 사줬는데 한두개씩 잃어버려서 다시삼 ㅜ.

단순한 선물이 아닌, ‘몰입’과 ‘표현’의 기회를 주는 특별한 리스트 입니다, 9세 6세 엄청 잘가지고 놉니다 ㅋㅋㅋ 맥포머스보다 훨 괜찮은듯 자석블럭이라 만들기 쉽고 냉장고나 칠판에 붙어서 이렇게 저렇게 잘 갖고놈 사실 작년에도 사줬는데 한두개씩 잃어버려서 다시삼 ㅜ. 여아 장난감은 인형의집, 화장품놀이 이런 것이 떠오르고요. 오늘은 4세, 5세, 6세 장난감 소개해 드릴게요.

아직 미취학 아동은 아니지만 더 이상 어린아이도 아닌 9세 어린이는 십대에 접어들고 있습니다, 아직 미취학 아동은 아니지만 더 이상 어린아이도 아닌 9세 어린이는 십대에 접어들고 있습니다. 감수성 폭팔 예민보스 9살, 지민이 생일을 맞아 어떤 선물을 해야 할지 고민이 많았어요 올해도 그냥 장난감이나 인형같은 것 중에 좋아할 만한 걸로 사줄까.

선물 준비하실 때 참고하시고 도움이 되시길.. 1237 url 복사 이웃추가 공유하기 시크릿쥬쥬 왕팬인 막뚱이 이제는 집안에 있는 모든것을 마음에 드는 캐릭터로 바꾸려고 하는건지 얼마전부터 눈독들인 어린이노트북이 가지고 싶다고 사달라고 아빠를 설득을 하고.. 선물 준비하실 때 참고하시고 도움이 되시길..

9살 여아 장난감을 위한 리스트를 소개하려고 합니다, 여아 장난감은 인형의집, 화장품놀이 이런 것이 떠오르고요. Com › entry › 내가원하는내가 원하는 9세 여아 장난감 후회를 안하려면, 쿠팡이 추천하는 9세 여아 장난감 관련 혜택과 특가.

Mib Suy-101

서울 동대문구에서 50대 남성이 장난감과 돈을 미끼로 초등학생 여아를 유인하려다 실패해 미성년자 유인 미수 혐의로 구속됐다. 5세 남아, 9세 여아 크리스마스선물 고르기. 보드게임 〰 이렇게 학령전기, 만 6세부터 9세 아이들의 발달특징과 놀이에 대해서 이야기해 보았어요.

Com › entry › 내가원하는내가 원하는 9세 여아 장난감 후회를 안하려면. 쿠팡이 추천하는 9세 여아 장난감 특가를 만나보세요. 9살장난감 에 대한 검색결과 연관검색어 8세여아장난감 초등여아장난감 여아장난감 여아장난감9세 9살선물 여아선물8세 여아장남감9세 조카선물8살 여자장난감 장난감 배송비 포함 쿠팡 랭킹순 쿠팡 랭킹순은 판매 실적, 고객 선호도, 상품 경쟁력 및. Com › besttoysfor9yearoldgirls만 9세 여자아이를 위한 최고의 레고® 장난감 lego® shop kr.

6세 9세 여아 장난감이면서 초등학생 어린이 선물로 오늘도 잘 놀아보겠습니다 레고 공식스토어 브랜드스토어 레고 공식스토어입니다. Com › kokr › toysforgirls여아용 완구 lego® shop kr, 어린이날 선물이고민됩니다 여아9세 선물좀 추천부탁드립니다.

mib ㅇㄷ 인 것 같아요 가루로 젤리를 만드는 건. 이 부분에 대해서는 차근히 설명해 드릴게요. 아직 미취학 아동은 아니지만 더 이상 어린아이도 아닌 9세 어린이는 십대에 접어들고 있습니다. 9살 여아 장난감을 위한 리스트를 소개하려고 합니다. 오늘은 만 9세부터 12세 아동, 즉 10대초기에 해당하는 초등고학년 아이들의 발달특징과 장난감추천을 해 드릴 거예요. macoto asmr leak

mib 신인배우 서연 고민하다가 이제 초등학생인데, 그냥 장난감 말고 뭔가 도움이 될만한 선물 없을까. 9세 크리스마스선물 고민되신다면 40가지 이상의 다양한 서프라이즈가 들어있는 여아장난감 펀라켓 시크릿 메시지메이커 실패하지 않을 듯 합니다ꗯ̤̮ 펀라켓 시크릿 메시지 메이커 여아장난감 보물상자 조카선물 잼버스몰. 서울 동대문경찰서는 초등학생 여아를 유괴하려 한 혐의로 50대 남성 a씨를 구속했다고 밝혔습니다. 9살 여아 장난감을 위한 리스트를 소개하려고 합니다. 서울 동대문경찰서는 초등학생 여아를 유괴하려 한 혐의로 50대 남성 a씨를 구속했다고 밝혔습니다. livegorebrazil flamethrower

lover937디시 오늘은 4세, 5세, 6세 장난감 소개해 드릴게요. 아직 미취학 아동은 아니지만 더 이상 어린아이도 아닌 9세 어린이는 십대에 접어들고 있습니다. 제품 하단에 상품가격비교 및 구매평보기 누르시면 자세한 리뷰 구매후기 보실수 있을거예요. 9세 생일 장난감은 다양한 모양, 크기, 디자인으로 출시되어 기본 원형부터 복잡한 캐릭터 묘사에 이르기까지 다양한 테마와 이벤트에 어울린다. 쿠팡이 추천하는 여아장난감9세 특가를 만나보세요. lsfcx

mib 수위 이제 다들 크리스마스 선물은 준비하셨죠. 9살장난감 에 대한 검색결과 연관검색어 8세여아장난감 초등여아장난감 여아장난감 여아장난감9세 9살선물 여아선물8세 여아장남감9세 조카선물8살 여자장난감 장난감 배송비 포함 쿠팡 랭킹순 쿠팡 랭킹순은 판매 실적, 고객 선호도, 상품 경쟁력 및. 소근육 발달에도 좋고, 집중력에도 도움을 주는 레고프렌즈 아이들의 최고의 선물일 거 같네요. 쿠팡이 추천하는 여아장난감9세 특가를 만나보세요. 9살은 창의력과 상상력이 폭발하는 시기로, 올바른 장난감을 선택해주면 아이의 전인적인 성장과 발달에 큰 도움이 됩니다.

m 자 이마 탈모 구별 디시 가루와 물 비율을 맞춰 젤리모양을 만드는건데. 감수성 폭팔 예민보스 9살, 지민이 생일을 맞아 어떤 선물을 해야 할지 고민이 많았어요 올해도 그냥 장난감이나 인형같은 것 중에 좋아할 만한 걸로 사줄까. 9세여아선물 어린이팔찌 우정템만들기 추억만들기. 반짝반짝 달님이에서 이번에 출시한 신제품. 9살은 창의력과 상상력이 폭발하는 시기로, 올바른 장난감을 선택해주면 아이의 전인적인 성장과 발달에 큰 도움이 됩니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.