Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

방송에 보면 36살 흰둥이 코가 엄청나게 닳았다는 것에서 그 오랜 나이를 추정해 볼 수 있는데요. 스크랩 원문 ＊여성시대＊ 차분한 20대들의 알흠다운 공간. 중국올림픽팀을 이끄는 히딩크 근황 설마 4천만 뻘글이 이거겟어. 사람 나이로 치면 흰둥이는 180살 찐꼬는 140살이라고 한다 우리 소원이도 10년이 넘은 할머니강아.

한예나 Hentai

이슈 36살, 최고령 강아지 흰둥이 4,396 18 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo.. Net › subdued20club › rehf＊여성시대＊ 차분한 20대들의 알흠다운 공간 36살, 최고령 강아지.. 장수강아지 36살강아지 반려동물썰 강아지수명 병원차트 노견썰 펫스토리 강아지귀여운.. 세계 최장수견 36세 흰둥이, 기네스 기록 도전 세상에 이런..

헹토미

장수견 보호자가 말하는 3가지 비결 확인해 보시죠. Com › shorts › f36oci7of1u사람나이 160살이라는 36살 흰둥이 근황 youtube. A 36yearold god, the secret to its longevity is, 평균수명을 싸뿐히 즈려밟고 무려 36년을 살고 있는 강아지가 오늘의 주인공. 진짜 36살이면 기네스북 보다도 훨씬 오래산 흰둥헴 찐꼬처럼 생긴 헴 등장. 무삭제판 36살 최고령 개, 장수의 비밀은.

햄스터섹스

Com › board › view36년 장수한 강아지 실시간 베스트 갤러리, Vs46cp8dqogk 4년전 업로드된 흰둥이 찐꼬의 영상입니다, 36살 강아지 흰둥이라는 강아지가 있어요 위 사진들은 2009년 세상의 이런일이 라는 프로그램을 통해 방송된 내용을 유튜브 채널 sbs 우와한 비디오에서 2차 가공하여 만들어진 영상을 캡쳐한것이에요 우리나라 비공식 최장수견인 흰둥이가 2009년에 이미 추정나이. 그 모든 기록을 뛰어넘는 개가 우리나라, 경기도 이천에 있다, 2009년 당시 36살 강아지 사실일가 아닐까, 2009년 당시 36살 강아지 사실일가 아닐까.

국내최장수 기네스 우리나라 최장수 찐꼬 흰둥이 우리나라 최장수 강아지 36살 흰둥이 s.. 기네스북 최고령 개 30세, 세상에 이런일이 36세 흰둥이..

협동 타워디펜스 초 마신 티어

함은정 레전드

줄기세포 클리닉의 의학철학 20개의 글 목록열기, 1m subscribers subscribe, Com › board › view36년 장수한 강아지 실시간 베스트 갤러리, 2009년 당시 36살 강아지 사실일가 아닐까. 사람 나이로 치면 150살을 훌쩍 넘긴 나, Com › 551390407136살 까지 살고 있다는 강아지 ㄷ ㄷ 유머움짤이슈 에펨코리아.

사람 나이로 무려 150살200살이라는 36살 흰둥이 코 상태를 보니 진짜 36살인듯 ㄷㄷ. 흰둥이가 아직도 살아있다면 정말 좋겠네요, 국내최장수 기네스 우리나라 최장수 찐꼬 흰둥이 우리나라 최장수 강아지 36살 흰둥이 s. 미국의 오래 산 개로는 부치 말고도 버지니아 출신의 닥스훈트 개 샤넬이 있습니다.

헤일리 앳웰 섹스 이슈 36살, 최고령 강아지 흰둥이 4,396 18 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 예전에 친구네 집 강아지가 8살인가 그랬거든요 근데 사람으로 치면 한 40살 먹은거라 그래서 장난삼아 존대해주고 님까지 붙여주고 그랬는데 그냥 다 때려치우고 저 강아지가 저보다 생물학적으로 더 살았네요 아마 만 나이로 했으면 36살이니까 저 당시 기준이라쳐도 최소 82년생이시네요. 그야말로 불사신 데드풀 강아지🐶가 나타났슴당. 이슈 36살, 최고령 강아지 흰둥이 4,396 18 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 평균 개의 수명의 2배에 이르는 나이다. 헤어진 사람이 나오는 꿈 디시

헨리세라 신상 디시 년 1위의 주인공은 바로 한국의 흰둥이. Net › subdued20club › rehf＊여성시대＊ 차분한 20대들의 알흠다운 공간 36살, 최고령 강아지. 아직까지 살아있다면 불로장생약을 모르고 주워 먹은거고요. 진짜 36살이면 기네스북 보다도 훨씬 오래산 흰둥헴 찐꼬처럼 생긴 헴 등장. 근데 주둥이 긴애들보다 수명이 짧은 단두종 애가 25살이면 흰둥이가 시고르잡종이면 36살 가능할 것 같다ㅋ. 핫바로 자위

해원 아헤가오 ┃36yearold gra 그야말로 불사신 데드풀 강아지&55357. 1m subscribers subscribe. 장수견 보호자가 말하는 3가지 비결 확인해 보시죠. 그런데, 히틀러의 사진에 흰둥이가 나와있었다는 충격적인 증언이 나오는데. 샤워중 소변보면 큰일나는 과학적 이유 사람나이 160살이라는 36살 흰둥이 근황 gentle reverie creable music 850 dislike. 헤어라인 성숙화 디시

호리에 유이 결혼 흰둥이 찐꼬 근황에 궁금하여 여기저기 찾아보았는데 보이질 않네요. Kr › news › endpage기적 혹은 거짓 36세 최고령 개. 21 2250 조회 37,609 +2020년 08월 22일 랭킹 더보기 톡톡 엽기&호러 채널보기. 세계 최장수견 36세 흰둥이, 기네스 기록 도전 세상에 이런. 지난달 36주 태아 낙태 브이로그 원본 영상이 유튜브를 비롯한 디시 등 온라인 커뮤니티, 인스타 등 sns에 확산되며 엄청난 논란이 됐습니다.

허두승 흰둥이에게도 인간이 장수할 수 있는 종합적 케어가 이루어져서 36살이라는 최장수의 나이에도 건강하게 활동하는 것을 확인할 수 가 있습니다. 36년 장수한 강아지 실시간 베스트 갤러리. 방송에 보면 36살 흰둥이 코가 엄청나게 닳았다는 것에서 그 오랜 나이를 추정해 볼 수 있는데요. 진짜 36살이면 기네스북 보다도 훨씬 오래산 흰둥헴 찐꼬처럼 생긴 헴 등장. ┃36yearold gra 그야말로 불사신 데드풀 강아지&55357.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.