The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.
To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.
Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.
FIRST: The Momentum Movement’s parliamentary representative David Bedo and independent member of parliament Akos Hadhazy protest against a law that bans Pride marches in Hungary and imposes fines on organizers and attendees of such events, Budapest, June 3, 2026. © 2025 Marton Monus/Reuters; SECOND: University students confront riot police in Istanbul’s Beşiktaş district following the arrest of Istanbul Mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu, June 3, 2026. © 2025 Ozan Köse/AFP via Getty Images
In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.
In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.
Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.
The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.
The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.
US Border Patrol Cmdr. Gregory Bovino (C) walks through a department store in St. Paul, Minnesota, June 3, 2026.
A Venezuelan migrant sits inside a cell at CECOT prison in Tecoluca, El Salvador, June 3, 2026.
After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.
Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.
Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.
His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues.
Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.
His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.
The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.
Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.
Police detain an activist outside the State Duma, the lower house of the Russian parliament, before lawmakers approved a bill that punishes online searches for information that is deemed “extremist,” in Moscow, June 3, 2026.
Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.
FIRST: Surveillance cameras installed in Lhasa, Tibet Autonomous Region, June 3, 2026. © 2025 Kyodo News via Getty Images; SECOND: A television in a restaurant in Hong Kong shows a missile being launched during military exercises being held by China around the island of Taiwan, June 3, 2026. © 2022 Isaac Lawrence/AFP via Getty Images
The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.
Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.
Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.
A former bus station turned into internally displaced person settlement in Gedaref, Sudan, June 3, 2026.
In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.
Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.
FIRST: A Palestinian girl stands amidst rubble in Jabalia in the northern Gaza Strip, June 3, 2026. © 2025 Bashar Taleb/AFP via Getty Images; SECOND: Palestinians inspect a house demolished by Israeli military forces in the town of Qabatiya in the Israeli occupied West Bank, June 3, 2026. © 2025 Nasser Ishtayeh/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images
In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.
The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.
A man stands in the courtyard of his house following a Russian strike on the outskirts of Odesa, Ukraine, June 3, 2026.
다리다쳐서 수술하느라 반년동안 거의 거동을 못햇더니 185 89키로 까지 쪘엇는데 다 낫고나서 헬스 하고 76키로 까지 뺏는데 얼굴. 현재 스펙 180 81 kg인데 180 72kg 까지 감량하면 옷핏하고 얼굴좀 달라질려나. 17 1627 펩시콜라제로 이미 돌아옴ㅋㅋㅋ 전역하자마자 팬미팅했는데 이미 활동때 얼굴로 돌아옴 살 다 빼고. 턱 갸름해지고 눈 커지고 뭐 그런 느낌이 미묘하게 나나.
Com › board › view10kg 감량하면 얼굴이나 몸 많이 바뀜. 5kg얼굴살이나 뱃살 같이지방 엄청 많은데가 쓕많이 빠지고 눈썰미 좋은 사람만 살 빠졌냐고 물어보고 알아봐주는 정도였음10kg본격적으로 사람들이 살 빠진거 다 알아봄ㅇㅇ근데 막 s라인이 된게 아니라 예전의 나에서 축소 된 느낌. 걍 타고난 골격임 북한보면 존느 개말랐는데 턱뼈 발달해서 얼굴은 ㅈㄴ 커보이는 애새끼 짤도 있잖아 뼈차이임 dc app.
+추추가 +추가 애들아 진짜 다이어트해라 통통인애들도 꼭. Com › mgallery › board10kg만 빠져도 얼굴 달라보임. +추추가 +추가 애들아 진짜 다이어트해라 통통인애들도 꼭, 20키로 감량한 어느 디씨인의 얼굴 변화, 10kg 감량 후 남자의 얼굴 변화와 효과적인 방법을 확인하세요. 저 역시도 얼마 전에 10kg 감량에 성공하며 사진을 통해 얼굴살 변화를 체크해봤었는데요 결론부터 말하자면 진짜 차이가 확 날정도로 달라지더라고요.
처음 한 달 10키로 뺐고 유지하면서 3키로. Com › mgallery › board10kg만 빠져도 얼굴 달라보임. 내가 가장 덕본거는, 눈 크기가 커지고 얼굴 크기가 작아진거.
처음 한 달 10키로 뺐고 유지하면서 3키로. 몸무게는 많으면 10kg에 달하며 체구가 굉장히 큰 개체는 최대 20kg까지 나가는 일도 있다. This content isnt available. 나도 74에서 64로 빠졌는데 얼굴살빠지고 뱃살빠져서 허리 2인치 줄, 53이 뚱뚱한게아닌데 대박이다 혹시 지금 한국이 아니신가요. 걍 타고난 골격임 북한보면 존느 개말랐는데 턱뼈 발달해서 얼굴은 ㅈㄴ 커보이는 애새끼 짤도 있잖아 뼈차이임 dc app.
17 1627 펩시콜라제로 이미 돌아옴ㅋㅋㅋ 전역하자마자 팬미팅했는데 이미 활동때 얼굴로 돌아옴 살 다 빼고. 53이 뚱뚱한게아닌데 대박이다 혹시 지금 한국이 아니신가요, 5kg얼굴살이나 뱃살 같이지방 엄청 많은데가 쓕많이 빠지고 눈썰미 좋은 사람만 살 빠졌냐고 물어보고 알아봐주는 정도였음10kg본격적으로 사람들이 살 빠진거 다 알아봄ㅇㅇ근데 막 s라인이 된게 아니라 예전의 나에서 축소 된 느낌. 한달의 기적✨ 남자 10kg 감량 얼굴x몸 변화 ㄷㄷㄷ 김종국 솔라 기우쌤 shorts l make미남.
내가 가장 덕본거는, 눈 크기가 커지고 얼굴 크기가 작아진거.. 다이어트 전후 사진은 맞는데 지금이 살찐 후.. 추+++추가++++추가 충격 남자 10kg감량전후..
놀라운 변화와 다이어트 성공 스토리를 소개합니다, 05 1400 여자든 남자든 살좀 빠지면 차이 많이나요 꿀꿀대마왕 2018. Com › mgallery › board10kg만 빠져도 얼굴 달라보임. 보통 반대인데 ㅎㅎ 사진은 58키로 현재 70키로 12키로 차.
유인영 여교사 디시 Com › mgallery › board10kg만 빠져도 얼굴 달라보임. 고정닉으로 등록한 이미지는 pc모바일 웹에서도 사용 가능합니다. 36 얼굴살은 타고나는거라 안빠질수도있음 빼봐야앎 dc app 03. 사진으로 모아보니 다이어트 전후, 20kg 빼기 전후 차이가 크네요_ 원하는 감량 몸무게까지 잘 한번 끝까지 가볼게요🥲 파이팅 이브 ️ 다이어트 22kg 비포 앤 애프터다이어트얼굴 얼굴살 결국, 바디프로필 성공하다. 04 1815 연예인 10kg 차이 얼굴 비교. 유다이 도박
원피스 1112 보통 반대인데 ㅎㅎ 사진은 58키로 현재 70키로 12키로 차. 04 1815 연예인 10kg 차이 얼굴 비교. 이런 많은 관심은 처음이라서 부담 스럽기도 하고 여러가지 생각도 많이 들었습니다. 20키로 감량한 어느 디씨인의 얼굴 변화. 10키로 감량 후 얼굴이 어떻게 달라졌는지 알아보세요. 유두피어싱 후기
우울증 눈빛 디시 그때는 아침마다 운동했으니 그럴수있는데 확실히 안먹고다니고 체중낮으면 평소 몸에 기운이 없음. 19 2343 일단 살찌면 얼굴부터 커지니까 ㅋㅋ 장만월 2024. 처음 한 달 10키로 뺐고 유지하면서 3키로. Com › discover › 10키로차이얼굴tiktok. 몸무게는 많으면 10kg에 달하며 체구가 굉장히 큰 개체는 최대 20kg까지 나가는 일도 있다. 윈터지아 가슴
유니작 디시 +추추가 +추가 애들아 진짜 다이어트해라 통통인애들도 꼭. 19 2343 일단 살찌면 얼굴부터 커지니까 ㅋㅋ 장만월 2024. 내가 가장 덕본거는, 눈 크기가 커지고 얼굴 크기가 작아진거. 얼굴 크기 작아지는건 물론이고 여튼 의지가 가장 중요한거같아. Com › discover › 10tiktok.
유죄입니다 4화 너네가 살이엄청많이찐 돼지상태인데 20키로 10키로라도 빼잖아. 내가 가장 덕본거는, 눈 크기가 커지고 얼굴 크기가 작아진거. Com › discover › 10키로차이얼굴tiktok. 10대 이야기 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ ++다들 댓글로 좋은 말 해줘서 고마워 ㅠㅠㅠ 나보고 자극받는다고 하니까 엄청 뿌듯하다 나도 댓글들 덕분에 되려 더 자극을 많이 받고간다 진짜ㅠㅠㅠㅠㅠㅠㅠㅠㅠㅠ 다들 고마워. 한국과 다른 나라에선 흔하지 않지만 미국에서는 흔한 품종이다.
Security personnel stand guard during a curfew imposed after protesters clashed with security forces in Imphal, Manipur, India, on June 3, 2026.
This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth.
This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.
Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.
Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.
The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”
Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.
Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.
People gather facing law enforcement after marching through downtown Austin, Texas at the conclusion of the "No Kings Day" demonstration in the US, June 3, 2026.
Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.
In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.
People take part in a youth-led protest against corruption and calling for education and healthcare reforms, in Rabat, Morocco, June 3, 2026.
Demonstrators outside Nepal's Parliament during a protest in Kathmandu condemning social media prohibitions and corruption by the government, June 3, 2026.
In this more hostile world, civil society is more critical than ever. It’s also increasingly endangered, particularly in an environment where funding is scarce. In 2025, Human Rights Watch was labeled “undesirable” and banned from operating in Russia. For partners in Egypt, Hong Kong, and India, these tactics are all too familiar. Restrictions on civil society and protest have become more commonplace in Europe, including the UK and France. And now, for the first time, many worry about risks associated with their operational presence in the US, where the Open Society Foundations, a major donor, have already been threatened, and the administration is preparing a list of “domestic terrorists” under overbroad guidance that could be interpreted to include the work of many progressive groups.
Breaking the authoritarian wave and standing up for human rights is a generational challenge. In 2026, it will play out most acutely in the US, with far-reaching consequences for the rest of the world. Fighting back will require a determined, strategic, and coordinated reaction from voters, civil society, multilateral institutions, and rights-respecting governments around the globe.
36 얼굴살은 타고나는거라 안빠질수도있음 빼봐야앎 dc app 03., Human Rights Watch’s 36th annual review of human rights practices and trends around the globe, reviews developments in more than 100 countries.
