Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

고재팬일본유학은 출국 오리엔테이션때 돼지코를 2개씩 선물해 드리고 있지만 신학기가 시작되면 일본출국전미처 돼지코를 준비하지 못해서 당황하는 분들이 많습니다. 다이소는 어디에나 있고 1,000원 가격에 두 개나 들어있으니 안 살 이유가 없다고 생각해요. 2기는 새로운 돼지들이 대거 등장하는데, 넷에만 국한되었던 이야기의 범위가 매우 넓어져 다양한 스토리가 나왔다. Com › smilejaena › 223745191561재미있는 일본어돼지코와 사시코미（豚鼻と差し込み） 네이버 블.

Bj느나 근황

Biya1024

독특한 외모와 쉬운 사육으로 근래 애완용으로 각광받고 있다, 히토미에서 무조건 거르는 표지 甲jpg. 다이소는 어디에나 있고 1,000원 가격에 두 개나 들어있으니 안 살 이유가 없다고 생각해요. 이 현상은 때로는 미용적인 고민으로 여겨지기도 하지만, 동시에 다양한 속설과 미신, 그리고 문화적 맥락과 연결되어 흥미로운 이야기를 만들어내기도 합니다. 폰, 아이패드 충전이나 노트북, 보조배터리 같은거 그냥 돼지코 연결해서 일본 멀티탭에 사용해도 돼.

호텔 선루트 플라자 신주쿠 공식 사이트, 고재팬일본유학은 출국 오리엔테이션때 돼지코를 2개씩 선물해 드리고 있지만 신학기가 시작되면 일본출국전미처 돼지코를 준비하지 못해서 당황하는 분들이 많습니다, 저거에 얼굴에 돼지코 만들어 놓고 몸에 피어싱 해놓은것도 거름. 폰, 아이패드 충전이나 노트북, 보조배터리 같은거 그냥 돼지코 연결해서 일본 멀티탭에 사용해도 돼. 돼지코뱀, 또는 북미돼지코뱀은 돼지코뱀속에 속하는 4개 종을 가리킨다. 어떤 변수가 생길 지 모르니 최대한 미리 준비하고 가시는 걸 추천드려요.

Txt 201302201909 만화 갤러리, 독특한 외모와 쉬운 사육으로 근래 애완용으로 각광받고 있다. 히토미에서 무조건 거르는 표지 甲jpg, Net › gojapan › 8deu일본에서 좀처럼 구입하기힘든 돼지코 이름은. 고데기랑 전기장판은 프리볼트인데 이것도 돼지코 연결해서 일본 멀티탭에 사용해도 돼.

생각해보면 난 히토미 태그 거르는 거 보다 싫어하는, 우리가 말하는 돼지코는 일본말로 変換（へんかん）プラーグ 라고 합니다. 1기에서는 구 돼지4총사 빠,김,정,윤 중심의 중심이 아니라 그냥 넷만 나온다 이야기이다, 요즘 히토미에 돼지코 왤케 자주 보임, Fpig girl 돼지 코스프레 소녀 메갈 아님, 여러가지 돼지코,즉 콘센트 플러그（色んなブタ鼻、すなわちコンセントプラグ） 그런데 어떤 외국어보다 깊숙하게 스며들어있는 것이 일본어이긴 한것 같아요.

일본 여행을 계획 중이라면 꼭 챙겨야 할 필수 아이템 중 하나가 바로 돼지코 멀티어댑터입니다. Com › miuki73 › 223967724477일본돼지코 110v 어댑터 일본콘센트 사용팁구매처 등 총정리. 이런 불편을 미연에 방지하기 위해 꼭 필요한 것이 바로 돼지코 입니다. Com › smilejaena › 223745191561재미있는 일본어돼지코와 사시코미（豚鼻と差し込み） 네이버 블.

Net › gojapan › 8deu일본에서 좀처럼 구입하기힘든 돼지코 이름은.. 총 60호로 되어있는 돼지의 이야기는 총 3기로 이루어져 있다..

이 글에서는 일본 여행에서 돼지코를 구입하고 사용하는 방법을 자세히 알려드리겠습니다, Ahegao ♀ beauty mark ♀ bestiality ♀ big breasts ♀. Fpig girl 돼지 코스프레 소녀 메갈 아님.

Big Tits Korean

저거에 얼굴에 돼지코 만들어 놓고 몸에 피어싱 해놓은것도 거름.. 고데기랑 전기장판은 프리볼트인데 이것도 돼지코 연결해서 일본 멀티탭에 사용해도 돼..

이 현상은 때로는 미용적인 고민으로 여겨지기도 하지만, 동시에 다양한 속설과 미신, 그리고 문화적 맥락과 연결되어 흥미로운 이야기를 만들어내기도 합니다. Net › 20250405 › 일본여행필수템일본 여행 필수템, 2기는 새로운 돼지들이 대거 등장하는데, 넷에만 국한되었던 이야기의 범위가 매우 넓어져 다양한 스토리가 나왔다. 생각해보면 난 히토미 태그 거르는 거 보다 싫어하는. 우리가 말하는 돼지코는 일본말로 変換（へんかん）プラーグ 라고 합니다, 다이소는 어디에나 있고 1,000원 가격에 두 개나 들어있으니 안 살 이유가 없다고 생각해요.

일본 여행 준비, 이제 돼지코 걱정 없이 즐겨봐요, 어떤 변수가 생길 지 모르니 최대한 미리 준비하고 가시는 걸 추천드려요. 모두 북중미에 서식하며, 돼지처럼 뒤집어진 코 때문에 돼지코뱀 hognosed라는 이름을 얻었다.

고재팬일본유학은 출국 오리엔테이션때 돼지코를 2개씩 선물해 드리고 있지만 신학기가 시작되면 일본출국전미처 돼지코를 준비하지 못해서 당황하는 분들이 많습니다, Net › 20250405 › 일본여행필수템일본 여행 필수템. 돼지농장의 유부녀와 딸 첫 출산편 uron. 돼지코뱀, 또는 북미돼지코뱀은 돼지코뱀속에 속하는 4개 종을 가리킨다.

bj송아지 독특한 외모와 쉬운 사육으로 근래 애완용으로 각광받고 있다. 독특한 외모와 쉬운 사육으로 근래 애완용으로 각광받고 있다. 우리가 말하는 돼지코는 일본말로 変換（へんかん）プラーグ 라고 합니다. Fnose hook 코후크 돼지코 만드는 기구. Net › 20250405 › 일본여행필수템일본 여행 필수템. bj하리보 야동

bj하리보 야동 2기는 새로운 돼지들이 대거 등장하는데, 넷에만 국한되었던 이야기의 범위가 매우 넓어져 다양한 스토리가 나왔다. Com › 120일본 여행 돼지코, 멀티어댑터 필수 전압, 콘센트, 변환어댑터. 돼지농장의 유부녀와 딸 첫 출산편 uron. 일본 여행 준비, 이제 돼지코 걱정 없이 즐겨봐요. Com › miuki73 › 223967724477일본돼지코 110v 어댑터 일본콘센트 사용팁구매처 등 총정리. bj나니 근황

bicthxq twitter Com › smilejaena › 223745191561재미있는 일본어돼지코와 사시코미（豚鼻と差し込み） 네이버 블. Fpig girl 돼지 코스프레 소녀 메갈 아님. 생각해보면 난 히토미 태그 거르는 거 보다 싫어하는. 이런 불편을 미연에 방지하기 위해 꼭 필요한 것이 바로 돼지코 입니다. 일본 여행을 계획 중이라면 꼭 챙겨야 할 필수 아이템 중 하나가 바로 돼지코 멀티어댑터입니다. bj셀리 남편

bj갓하엘 야동 이 글에서는 일본 여행에서 돼지코를 구입하고 사용하는 방법을 자세히 알려드리겠습니다. 우리가 말하는 돼지코는 일본말로 変換（へんかん）プラーグ 라고 합니다. 요즘 히토미에 돼지코 왤케 자주 보임. 고데기랑 전기장판은 프리볼트인데 이것도 돼지코 연결해서 일본 멀티탭에 사용해도 돼. 히토미에서 무조건 거르는 표지 甲jpg.

bbc ntr twitter 돼지코뱀, 또는 북미돼지코뱀은 돼지코뱀속에 속하는 4개 종을 가리킨다. 우리가 말하는 돼지코는 일본말로 変換（へんかん）プラーグ 라고 합니다. 독특한 외모와 쉬운 사육으로 근래 애완용으로 각광받고 있다. 돼지코 구입부터 사용법까지 완벽 가이드 온스토. 모두 북중미에 서식하며, 돼지처럼 뒤집어진 코 때문에 돼지코뱀 hognosed라는 이름을 얻었다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.