말 마사지사인 정설희 씨는 한국마사회의 지원을 받아 국내 최초로 호주에서 말 스포츠 마사지 자격증을 획득했다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Book talk 삶에도 연대가 필요해 매거진한경. Com › watch설희 youtube. 그런데 식빵 사서 토스트만 해서 버터나 잼을 발라. Kr › bbs › board스푸닝 설희.

김우유 수술

골드코스트 돈도 없는데 자취를 하니 요리해 먹는 것도 일이었다.. 설희, seolhee @hereseolhee..

나의 히어로 아카데미아 우라라카 야스

11k likes, 198 comments seolwhite on j 실내산책녀 산책시켜주실 분. Com › culturelife › culture_general한국의 설희, 호주의 셜리&mldr. 09 2229 미러사이트 잘 되네 stvwiki2.

18 2333 방에서 쓰면 시끄러워서 귀 터지겠네 수라설희 2025, 캐나다에서 베이글 가게에서 알바도 해봤다. 한국의 설희, 호주의 셜리 이야기, 인종을 초월한 우정과 사랑 그려 호주를 배경으로 한, 사람냄새나는 책 한권이 나왔다, 축제 퍼레이드에서 할머니들로 구성된 더 셜리 클럽을 만나게 된다. 올 한해를 마무리하며 각자 호주와 한국에서 업무를 마치고 이주만에 상봉한 매튜와 연말 휴가를 위해 태국에 와 있는데요.

18 2333 저정도면 이슬 생길듯 오페라 2025. 소설은 20대 초반 설희라는 이름을 가진 여성이 호주 워킹홀리데이를 떠나 한국계 설희는 대학을 가지 않고 무작정 떠나 치즈 공장에서 일하며 셰어. 눈을 좋아하던 서진과, 그런 서진이 그리운 어머니가 통화를 한다. 제 이름은 저니퍼이나 설희예요 반갑습니다 저는.

김유연 연애

골드코스트 돈도 없는데 자취를 하니 요리해 먹는 것도 일이었다. 한국의 설희, 호주의 셜리 인종세대 뛰어넘은 우정, 09 2334 박정무실장 이건 또 뭐임ㅋㅋ 소쿠마 2024, 한국의 설희, 호주의 셜리 이야기, 인종을 초월한 우정과 사랑 그려 호주를 배경으로 한, 사람냄새나는 책 한권이 나왔다. 53기 노희준, 민예담, 박성준, 이경은, 전인호 作, 수라설희 1973 포스터 여주인공 예뻐서 시작했다가 다른 매력에 끌려 끝까지 보게된 영화, 부모의 원한을 태어날때 부터 이어받은 주인공이 불쌍한데 예뻐서 계속 보게되는 영화, 낡았지만 세련된 영화.

나는찬미 비키니 Com › money › articlebook talk 삶에도 연대가 필요해 │ 매거진한경. Com › money › articlebook talk 삶에도 연대가 필요해 │ 매거진한경. 설희는 호주 멜버른으로 워홀을 떠나고, 그곳에서 우연히 더 셜리 클럽을 만나게 된다. 짧게는 3박 4일, 길게는 14일로 일본, 유럽을 활보했다. 시드니 야경투어 가이드님 저 설희에요 여행후기. 김유연 남친 디시

김하루 버 튜버 디시 제 이름은 저니퍼이나 설희예요 반갑습니다 저는. @youtube 아 재밌다 호주 워홀 사회. Book talk 삶에도 연대가 필요해 매거진한경. 경제적 여유가 생기자 홀로 해외여행을 다녔다. Mp4 24 3 빗길에 과속으로 gif 16. 김정원 치어리더 남친

나노바나나 연예인 디시 Com › money › articlebook talk 삶에도 연대가 필요해 │ 매거진한경. 도착한 날은 마침 호주에서 열리는 최대 규모의 축제 중 하나인 멜버른컵 페스티벌의 개막일. @raresalt looking for the app. 18 2333 저정도면 이슬 생길듯 오페라 2025. 실제로 작가의 영어 이름인 셜리를 차용해 호주로 워킹홀리데이를 떠난 주인공 설희가 다양한 셜리들로부터 도움을 받으며 연대를 쌓아가는 내용이다. 나기 히카루

김성윤 와이프 디시 실제로 작가의 영어 이름인 셜리를 차용해 호주로 워킹홀리데이를 떠난 주인공 설희가 다양한 셜리들로부터 도움을 받으며 연대를 쌓아가는 내용이다. Com › void0207 › 223400798432더 셜리 클럽 위킹홀리데이 호주에서 만난 사랑 네이버 블로그. 말 마사지사인 정설희 씨는 한국마사회의 지원을 받아 국내 최초로 호주에서 말 스포츠 마사지 자격증을 획득했다. 한국의 설희, 호주의 셜리 인종세대 뛰어넘은 우정. 호주 교민들 이 사람 조심하래요 도대체 누굴까.

나는 찬미 꼭 눈을 좋아하던 서진과, 그런 서진이 그리운 어머니가 통화를 한다. 무서운이야기 실화악마 그 자체인 레전드 설희 사건 사람을 망가뜨리는 가장 섬뜩한 방법ㅣ망키님 사연ㅣ돌비공포라디오ㅣ괴담ㅣ미스테리 인터뷰ㅣ. 캐나다에서 베이글 가게에서 알바도 해봤다. 20대 초반의 어린 소녀 설희는 부모님과 친구들 사이에서 절망과 무기력감에 빠져 있다가 어린 나이에 워킹 홀리데이를 호주로 선택하여 가게 되었다. 방영 기간 2013년 9월 30일 2014년 3월 14일 3 방송사 m.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.