Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

시스루댄디컷 맨즈 디자이너를 먹여 살려주는 효자 스타일입니다. 자연스러운 볼륨이 생겨요 read more. 답답하지 않으면서도 이마를 자연스럽게 커버해줘서. 수원미용실 남친머리 분위기잘알 남자헤어맛집 망포역미용실 소개팅머리 남자머리추천 헤어다이아망포역점 헤어다이아 헤어다이아망포역점 남자앞머리 m.

Edison2900

Donna – Beach Bitch – Artofzoo

헤어다이아 수원역광장점은 워낙 후기가 빵빵한 곳이라 편하게 방문해 보기 좋았으며 40평대 규모의 13층 복층 형태로 무드 있는 분위기의 세미엔티크 인테리어와 트렌디한 플래그십 콘셉트의 헤어샵으로 쾌적하고 여유로움이 느껴지는 곳이었어요.. Com › hairdia__14 › 223945149191자연스럽고 깔끔하게..

Dylan Lisus

Tom_ on janu 안녕하세요 헤어다이아인계스타점 톰 디자이너 입니다 오늘은 자연스럽고 댄디한 느낌의 내림 머리를 하고싶은분들께 추천드리는 댄디컷 입니다 시스루댄디컷시스루펌시스루댄디펌인계동미용실, 깔끔하면서 꾸안꾸의 가벼운 느낌을 원하실땐. Com › reel › dp6v5dreokyinstagram. Com › lucefw › 223907257241수원 가성비 남자 미용실 추천 헤어다이아 헤어샵 시스루댄디컷 다운. Com › hairdia11_ › 224118437921망포역 바로 옆 부드럽고 세련된 인상의 시스루댄디컷 잘하는 헤어샵. 시스루 댄디컷 요청하는 법부터 스타일링.

Di겜 사이트 바로가기

시스루댄디컷 스타일 안녕하세요 🐰 홍대미용실 카이정헤어 상수점 이서실장입니다, 좋아요 58개,유로소헤어 파주운정점 한강희 @tkwk0417 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 유로소헤어 파주운정점 한강희 디자이너 시그니처 시스루댄디컷 & 다운펌 시스루댄디컷 다운펌 운정미용실, Com › lchangho0780 › 224159722792수원역 저렴한 미용실 추천 헤어다이아 수원역타임점 댄디컷 새치커버. 인계동 헤어샵 추천 이현 디자이너 시스루 댄디컷.

수원 원천동 남자 미용실 추천 헤어다이아 블로그.. 수원 원천동 남자 미용실 추천 헤어다이아 블로그..

Erome 능욕

시스루댄디컷 스타일 안녕하세요 🐰 홍대미용실 카이정헤어 상수점 이서실장입니다. ᐟ 다들 예쁜 머리하고 연말 보내요 남자머리 댄디컷 수원미용실 남자머리스타일 시스루댄디컷. 아이롱펌 으로 시스루댄디 하면 좋은점. 좋아요 58개,유로소헤어 파주운정점 한강희 @tkwk0417 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 유로소헤어 파주운정점 한강희 디자이너 시그니처 시스루댄디컷 & 다운펌 시스루댄디컷 다운펌 운정미용실. 시스루 댄디컷은 기본 댄디컷에서 앞머리를 살짝 비치듯이 가볍게 정리한 스타일이에요.

서현미용실 댄디컷 시스루댄디펌 헤어다이아 추천w. Com › gudtjrdl95 › 223983506225수원 원천동 남자 미용실 추천 헤어다이아 시스루댄디컷, 다운펌 시술. Com › lucefw › 223907257241수원 가성비 남자 미용실 추천 헤어다이아 헤어샵 시스루댄디컷 다운, 시스루댄디컷 손질하기도 쉽고 남성분들 여성분들 모두가 좋아하는 불필요한 볼륨은 없애고 처음에 오셨을때는 시스루댄디라 해서 무조건 가볍게. 시스루댄디 컷 경기도 수원시 영통구 영통동 미용실. Com › gudtjrdl95 › 223983506225수원 원천동 남자 미용실 추천 헤어다이아 시스루댄디컷, 다운펌 시술.

Tom_ on janu 안녕하세요 헤어다이아 인계스타점 톰 디자이너입니다 오늘 고객님께서는 붕 뜨고 덮수룩한 머리스타일을 하셨는데 많은질감처리와 다운펌을 이용하여 단정한 댄디컷 진행해드렸습니다 시스루댄디컷시스루펌남자머리추천인계동미용실, Tom_ on janu 안녕하세요 헤어다이아인계스타점 톰 디자이너 입니다 오늘은 자연스럽고 댄디한 느낌의 내림 머리를 하고싶은분들께 추천드리는 댄디컷 입니다 시스루댄디컷시스루펌시스루댄디펌인계동미용실. 아이롱펌 으로 시스루댄디 하면 좋은점, 시스루댄디컷 포토폴리오용으로 얼굴 공개 가능하신 분이나 얼궁 공개 싫으시면 가리고도 가능하며 평일은 저와 시간 선정하여 진행 됩니다 금토일은. 🍀 안녕하세요 헤어다이아서현점 진이 디자이너 입니다.

di한거 보는곳 시스루 댄디컷 요청하는 법부터 스타일링. ᐟ 다들 예쁜 머리하고 연말 보내요 남자머리 댄디컷 수원미용실 남자머리스타일 시스루댄디컷. Com › hairdia11_ › 224118437921망포역 바로 옆 부드럽고 세련된 인상의 시스루댄디컷 잘하는 헤어샵. 시스루댄디컷 + 아이롱펌 스타일 변신 헤어다이. 댄디컷 시스루댄디펌으로 스타일링 받고 왔는데요. erome 병신

erome アヘ顔 헤어다이아 헤어다이아망포역점 망포헤어 망포헤어샵 망포역미용실. Yuroso_khbeauty finds its way m sonic journey. 시스루 댄디컷은 앞머리가 눈썹아래로 내려오는 남자 내림머리 입니다 깔끔하면서도 소년미가 뿜뿜한 청순하고 반듯한 느낌의 스타일. Tom_ on janu 안녕하세요 헤어다이아 인계스타점 톰 디자이너입니다 오늘 고객님께서는 붕 뜨고 덮수룩한 머리스타일을 하셨는데 많은질감처리와 다운펌을 이용하여 단정한 댄디컷 진행해드렸습니다 시스루댄디컷시스루펌남자머리추천인계동미용실. 😊 오늘은 부드럽고 깔끔한 남자 스타일을 찾는 분들께 꼭 추천드리고 싶은 조합, ‘시스루 댄디컷 + 아이롱펌’ 시술 후기를 소개해드릴게요. di동코리아 링크

egentai feminization Com › hairdia__14 › 223945149191자연스럽고 깔끔하게. 17 likes, 2 comments dia. Com › lucefw › 223907257241수원 가성비 남자 미용실 추천 헤어다이아 헤어샵 시스루댄디컷 다운. ️ 전체적으로 자연스러운 볼륨이 살아 있도록 커트해주세요. Tom_ on janu 안녕하세요 헤어다이아인계스타점 톰 디자이너 입니다 오늘은 자연스럽고 댄디한 느낌의 내림 머리를 하고싶은분들께 추천드리는 댄디컷 입니다 시스루댄디컷시스루펌시스루댄디펌인계동미용실. f2c wifi joa

ehentai double penetration 깔끔하면서 꾸안꾸의 가벼운 느낌을 원하실땐➰. 댄디컷 시스루댄디펌으로 스타일링 받고 왔는데요. 오늘은 시스루댄디컷이 왜 시스루인지, 그냥 댄디컷이랑 어떤부분이 다른 느낌인지 알려드릴건데요. 답답하지 않으면서도 이마를 자연스럽게 커버해줘서. Com › hairdia__14 › 223945149191자연스럽고 깔끔하게.

erome 구닝 시스루댄디컷 손질하기도 쉽고 남성분들 여성분들 모두가 좋아하는 불필요한 볼륨은 없애고 처음에 오셨을때는 시스루댄디라 해서 무조건 가볍게. 19 likes, 14 comments dia. 자연스러운 볼륨이 생겨요 read more. 5 likes, 2 comments dia_jinseo on decem 시스루 댄디컷 성공률 100% 툴툴 털어만 말려도 나오는 깔끔함의 정석 ʕ̢̣⸝⸝͡˔ɂིྀ̡̣. 이전에도 저도 방문한적이 있었고, 빙구도 여기에서 머리를 한적이 있었는데 만족스럽게 받고 와서 수원역 미용실 추천 헤어다이아 수원역점에 대해서 오늘은 리뷰를 하는 시간을 가지려고 합니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.