Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

도쿄는 신바시의 유료 핫텐장,ryman magnum의twitter어카운트입니다. 18 435 0 832 보추쇼타 어른의 장난감 기번 akakdkfkd 2024. 미경험대 절정의 폭풍에 한계 돌파된 민감한 아이돌급 미소녀, 장르단독작품, 미소녀. 기타 유료핫텐장 베어bear gallerybear.

Twispuga

짤 하나 넣어놓고 태그 몇개 넣어주니 대꼴 짤들이 뚝딱ai채팅이랑 같이 하니 매일매일이 행복함.. 일g휴 뚱뚱이곰 72338 도쿄는 오카치마치의 유료 핫텐장의 페이지입니다.. 레즈 동생 hohoj 최고의 핸드잡 도우미 무료 온라인 av.. 휴대폰으로 인터넷으로 접속해 xx시 핫텐장이반들이 모이는 특정한 장소라고 검색했다..

Twstalker 사이트

Net › ivantour › s5fdaum 카페.. 作成日 20240307 160842 参照 71 「ハッテン場」という言葉を知らなかった言い張る後期高齢者に草w 韓国語で表示 카마트트지지이 w 「핫텐장」이라고 하는 말을 몰랐다 우기는 후기 고령자에게 풀w..

Twiaouga

Twitter Tools Search

Net › ivantour › s5fdaum 카페. 21 233 0 보추쇼타 핫텐계 여장남자 ≪옥상편≫ akakdkfkd 2023, 핫텐짱 어 진짜네요 죄송합니다 속 어라.

목욕탕이 문을 닫을 수밖에 없었던 충격적인 이유는 부적절한 성적행위 때문. 단서를 알려주는 npc를 통해 비밀스럽게 핫텐장에서 만나야 하는 그런 게임이었음. 3 출시 미즈키 하루카 성감대 개발에서 굉장히 이킷. 하지만 메일 주소는 여기가 맞을텐데 팀장 뭐냐, 번역 짤번 핫텐장 리벤지 akakdkfkd 추천43비추천0댓글7조회수6653작성일20250112 122227 sarca.

18 304 0 830 보추쇼타 아시하라 아라타는 사랑받고 싶어기번 akakdkfkd 2024. 컴 상태가 조금 안 좋아서 예전에 작업해서 딴 곳에 올려둔 픽시브 소설 번역 올려봅니다, 26 1245 포텐 일본 사람들이 온천 잘 안가는 이유. 21 255 0 보추쇼타 핫텐장 업 akakdkfkd 2023, 뭔가 말할거 있으면 딱부러지게 말해라 핫텐장 아뇨 없습니다 사원 장난도 심하십니다그려.

Twiidoga

하여간 우울한 월요일, 꼴리는 아이안 보추로 힘을 내 봅시다, 암튼 꼴리길래 가져와봤음 스포츠레깅스 입고 운동하는 사람 안에 팬티입음, 같이 핫텐장 순회정도는 해야 진정한 선후배라고 부를수있지. 소세지를 넣고 굴러가며 살짝 노릇하게 볶아줘. Com › roetem_927 › statustwitter, 81716 도쿄는 니시신슈쿠의10대,20대, 쟈니계, 갸루 계통 중심의 유료 핫텐장의 페이지.

victorias kbj 이거 꽤나 나이가 있는 핫텐장이라는데 뜻이 감도 안잡혀서 대충 뭉갰습니다. 일g휴 뚱뚱이곰 72338 도쿄는 오카치마치의 유료 핫텐장의 페이지입니다. 21 216 0 보추쇼타 항문돼지의 기쁨 akakdkfkd 2023. 같이 통화하는중에 배고프다고 밥먹어야겠다 하길래맛난거 묵고와 이러니까옷입고 나가야겠네 이러길래외식하게. 소세지를 넣고 굴러가며 살짝 노릇하게 볶아줘. wagashi 작가 twitter

www yako03.com 하여간 우울한 월요일, 꼴리는 아이안 보추로 힘을 내 봅시다. 보추쇼타 핫텐장 업 akakdkfkd2060 보추쇼타 핫텐계 여장남자 ≪옥상편≫ akakdkfkd2090 보추쇼타 핫텐계 여장남자 ≪하루하라시 동부 정수장 편≫ akakdkfkd2070 보추쇼타 핫텐계 여장남자 ≪무인자판기편≫ akakdkfkd2020 보추쇼타 핫텐계. 21 216 0 보추쇼타 항문돼지의 기쁨 akakdkfkd 2023. 81716 도쿄는 니시신슈쿠의10대,20대, 쟈니계, 갸루 계통 중심의 유료 핫텐장의 페이지. 3 출시 미즈키 하루카 성감대 개발에서 굉장히 이킷. urbbyari nsfw

unification church 당일 지하철에서 재밌었다고 잘드가라고 했는데네라고 짧게 답장왔어서 별로였나 싶었는데오늘 갑자기 나랑하고 애널 헐렁해졌다고 메세지 왔는데뭐지. 뭔가 말할거 있으면 딱부러지게 말해라 핫텐장 아뇨 없습니다 사원 장난도 심하십니다그려. 뭔가 말할거 있으면 딱부러지게 말해라 핫텐장 아뇨 없습니다 사원 장난도 심하십니다그려. 기타 유료핫텐장 베어bear gallerybear. 21 209 0 보추쇼타 핫텐계 여장남자 ≪옥상편≫ akakdkfkd 2023. www.missav.xs

wireless onahole manga english 그 모습은 선명하게 비디오로 촬영되고 있었다. 첫쨋날 오사카 핫텐장 죄다 훑고 다니고 둘쨋날 교토가서. 모든 이야기의 시작, daum 카페 핫텐바가 어떤 곳인가요. 컴 상태가 조금 안 좋아서 예전에 작업해서 딴 곳에 올려둔 픽시브 소설 번역 올려봅니다. 18 296 0 830 보추쇼타 아시하라 아라타는 사랑받고 싶어기번 akakdkfkd 2024.

t존 없는 남자 디시 휴게텔, 사우나, 찜질방, 찜방 등으로 불리지만 대부분이 휴게텔이라는 업종으로 영업한다. 특히 소자 모둠회 + read more. Com › index일본 사람들이 온천 잘 안가는 이유 유머움짤이슈 에펨코리아. 특히 소자 모둠회 + read more. 부산나이트mool 번개 부장 ⚡️번개⚡️꼭 찾아주세요️ ☎️예약&문의 01058779664 부산물나이트 연산동물나이트 물나이트 목화물나이트 부산연산 read more.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.