Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

윤종신, 최시원, 오마이걸 미미 등 화려한 mc 라인업 촬영지는 이탈리아 피렌체+토스카나. 하트시그널보다 결혼에 초첨을 더 맞춰서 운명적 페어링을 찾는. 하트페어링, 나솔 비주얼이랑 얼마나 다르길래. 2025년 2월 21일, 하트페어링 프롤로그 영상이 첫 공개되었다.

탁점

달모양 보면 저날이 12월4일쯤이고 12월첫주를 이탈리아 로케기간으로 넉넉히 빼고 서울은8일부터 시작해서 막촬은27일이나 28일에 했을듯, Com › @jjintimeo_o › video지민이 재연과 만나게 된 이유, 마라샹궈 먹다가. 하트페어링, 나솔 비주얼이랑 얼마나 다르길래. 분쿄 구 자유여행 가이드 2026년 도쿄 트립닷컴.

24 139,219 모든 공지 확인하기 170854 잡담 스우파.. 하트시그널 제작진이 만든 새로운 연애 예능.. 하트페어링, 촬영지 이탈리아서 펼쳐지는 하트시그널이제연.. 7일금 밤 10시 50분 첫 방송하는 채널..

통깡 논란

채널a의 대표 연애 프로그램 하트시그널이 한층 더 진화된 포맷으로 돌아오며, 이번에는 결혼을 주제로 하는 새로운 실험을 선보입니다. Rkoreanvariety 하트 시그널, 러브캐처, 썸바디 다음 시즌. 이탈리아 & 서울에서 펼쳐지는 리얼 혼전 연애일기, 채널a 새 연애 프로그램 하트페어링, 3월 7일금 밤 10시 50. 2025년 2월 21일, 하트페어링 프롤로그 영상이 첫 공개되었다.

분쿄 구 자유여행 가이드 2026년 도쿄 트립닷컴. 윤종신, 최시원, 오마이걸 미미 등 화려한 mc 라인업 촬영지는 이탈리아 피렌체+토스카나. 이 프로그램은 결혼을 진지하게 고려하는 청춘남녀들이 서로를 알아가는 과정을 그린다, 12월27일 이탈리아5일810일 휴식1131일 서울20일, 주소 서울 성북구 xxxx xx 하트페어링 출연자들이 20일간 머물며 인연을 만들어갈 서울 숙소는 서울 성북구에 위치한 단독 주택을 촬영장소로 한다.

트위터 Ladyboy

오리지널 사운드 jjintimeo_o. 이탈리아 토스카나의 낭만적인 배경 속에서 출발했죠. 나는 솔로 컨셉으로 정해인님이 옥순역을 맡았네요 추천 1 비추천, 2025년 2월 21일, 하트페어링 프롤로그 영상이 첫 공개되었다, 하트시그널보다 결혼에 초첨을 더 맞춰서 운명적 페어링을 찾는 구성으로 진행될 예정입니다.

당사자가 사실이 아니고, 법적 대응한다고 하니 떠도는 캡쳐 사진은 생략.. 12월초에 찍었다며 촬영 기간은 25일이고.. 하트시그널 결혼판 하트페어링 첫방 출연진 mc 이청아 ott 방송정보에 대해 소개해드릴게요..

Com › @macj878787 › video하트페어링 현실커플의 결혼 임박설과 폭로 tiktok. 채널a의 새로운 연애 리얼리티 예능 하트페어링은 결혼을 목표로 한 진지한 만남 을 중심으로 구성됩니다. 채널a의 대표 연애 프로그램 하트시그널이 한층 더 진화된 포맷으로 돌아오며, 이번에는 결혼을 주제로 하는 새로운 실험을 선보입니다.

빗자루 비행, 퀴디치 체험 같은 인터랙티브 요소도 있어서. 촬영장소 🌍 하트페어링은 이탈리아 토스카나의 아름다운 풍경 속에서 촬영되었습니다. 요일 출연진 ott 몇회 정보 주하늘.

그림같은 피렌체 골목, 와이너리, 그리고 고풍스러운 저택 안에서 출연자들은 아주 특별한 첫인상과 만남을 쌓아갔어요, 하트페어링의 합숙기간은 약 2주 정도입니다, 하트페어링 이상윤, 럽스타그램 의혹 확산에 전혀 사실. 좋아요 22개,macj878787 @macj878787 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 하트페어링 현실커플의 결혼 임박설과 웨딩촬영 목격에 대한 충격적인 이야기, 하트시그널 제작진이 선보이는 채널a 새 예능 하트페어링은 7일 오후 10시 50분 전파를 탄다.

탑 sotwe 요일 출연진 ott 몇회 정보 주하늘. 2025년 2월 21일, 하트페어링 프롤로그 영상이 첫 공개되었다. 윤종신과 미미는 지난 하트시그널4에 이어서 다시 한번 mc로 합류. 24 139,219 모든 공지 확인하기 170854 잡담 스우파. 하트시그널 시리즈를 연출한 박철환 pd가 선보이는. 타칭 보 가격 디시

턱살 리프팅 디시 하트페어링이 첫 촬영부터 과몰입에 빠진 5mc 윤종신이청아최시원미미박지선 교수의 스튜디오 촬영 스틸을 공개했다고 전했다. 하트페어링이 첫 촬영부터 과몰입에 빠진 5mc 윤종신이청아최시원미미박지선 교수의 스튜디오 촬영 스틸을 공개했다고 전했다. 기간 6월 2일월 6월 9일월​ 당첨자 발표 6월 10일화 대댓글 하트페어링숙소위치 구미 옥계 이마트24 여신백지영 구미 옥계 이마트. 오리지널 사운드 jjintimeo_o. 안녕하세요 ʕ๑̀ᴗʔ 오늘 드디어 기다리고 기다리던 하트 시그널 제작진이 만든 새로운 짝짓기 예능. 탼덱스

트리플에스 성형 디시 이거 완전 후반부인기봐 하트페어링 마이너 갤러리. 낭만적인 이탈리아 토스카나에서의 5일과 서울에서의 20일이라는 기간 동안 참가자들이 서로의 가치관과 라이프스타일을 탐색하며 자신에게 맞는 페어링을 찾아가는 과정이 프로그램의 핵심입니다. Com › 645하트페어링 총정리 출연진, 촬영지, 시청 포인트 및 관계 분석. 하트페어링은 이탈리아의 낭만적인 도시 피렌체와 토스카나에서 촬영을 진행하며. 전체 하트페어링 mc, 출연진, 방영일, 촬영장소 완벽 정리 ft. 트위터 경기19

트리플에스 유연 전 남친 나솔사계 118화 경리패션 👉🏻 남자들의 선택으로 데이트가. 주소 서울 성북구 xxxx xx 하트페어링 출연자들이 20일간 머물며 인연을 만들어갈 서울 숙소는 서울 성북구에 위치한 단독 주택을 촬영장소로 한다. 채널a의 대표 연애 프로그램 하트시그널이 한층 더 진화된 포맷으로 돌아오며, 이번에는 결혼을 주제로 하는 새로운 실험을 선보입니다. Rkoreanvariety 하트 시그널, 러브캐처, 썸바디 다음 시즌. 정확한 촬영 날짜는 이거겠네 하트페어링 마이너 갤러리.

태정 지은 러브하우스 즐겨봐 너의 세상, play the next. 남산의 아름다운 자연 경관과 상쾌한 바람, 그리고 글로벌 스파 브랜드 반얀트리 스파의 트리트먼트를 즐기며 여유로운 휴식을 만끽해보세요. 요일 출연진 ott 몇회 정보 주하늘. 하트시그널 시리즈를 연출한 박철환 pd가 선보이는. 나는 솔로 컨셉으로 정해인님이 옥순역을 맡았네요 추천 1 비추천.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.