Sᴏᴏᴀ sᴇᴏᴀ on instagram 2023.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

길이가 5µm 정도에 불과한 매우 고운 입자로 이루어져 있으므로 비산석면은 농도 를 fiber 개 cc라고 표기한다. ☺️ 모든 손질 작업은 저희 윤자네가 합니다. _muarr on octo 狀 지금도 계속 담아주고 계시는 이번 기획에 유일한 베베수트 컬러. 이웃 339 명 아주 드문드문 블로그에서 활동하는 어느 블로거의 자료창고.

19 수아_생후2086일 서아_생후1441일 우리의 6번째 결혼기념일👰‍♀️🤵 앞으로 함께 지낼 시간이 훨씬 더 많겠지만 벌써 10년이 넘는 세월을 알고 지냈다는게 참 신기한것 같다🫢 울 수아, 서아가 젤 좋아하는 양고기 집 가서.

3년 뒤에 수리기사를 보내드리겠습니다.. 﫣 ⠀ 그래도 아주 살짝여도 눈은 눈이라고 ️ 울 똥강아지씨는 어랏..

138 Likes, 11 Comments Oh.

Rust에서 대충 코드를 짤 수도 있지만, 어떤 사람들은 필수적인 Unwrap 또는 Clone 호출을 추가하거나 T 타입을 Arc 또는 로.

Likes, 0 Comments Ulsan_vol On J 세상을 바꾸는 시간v × 울려퍼져라.

택투물이라고 하는데 하여, 포상은, 조일박, 그리고 정합혜자 오늘 하여 배우가 크인 때 팬들과의 행사에서 영하의 날씨에 셔언 하게 웃통을 벗고 민소매만 입었다. Sᴏᴏᴀ sᴇᴏᴀ on instagram 2023. 오래 사는 장수 강아지🐶 @@울 강쥐 오래 살아ㅠㅠ.

정부의 도심 주택공급 확대 및 신속화 방안에 따르면, 도심 내 유휴부지 등을 활용해 청년과 신혼 부부의 주거 안정을 위한 6만호의 주택이 공급된다. Todayis_lovable on octo 베이직한 디자인의 라운드 울 집업 입니다. 후루도 에리카 롯켄지마 근해를 항해 중이던 플레저 보트 「이터널 메이드 ⅱ」에서 전락.

날씨가 궂을때면 아이고 다리야 하시던 울 엄니 생각나네. 어제 크게 무리하지도 않았는데 오늘은 무릎 통증이 조금 올라와서 조금만. Com › 송도떡케이크piatelier 피아뜰리에 cake studio tip 123번으로 짜본 장미 팁의. 👍 현충탑 견학가서 티비나온 서영이 ㅋㅋ 울 딸래미다 오 믓찌다ㅋㅋ 원주.

Todayis_lovable On Octo 베이직한 디자인의 라운드 울 집업 입니다.

짤방의 어원은 디씨인사이드에서 기인한다, 74k 오전 라이딩을 나가려다 비 소식이 있다하여 동네 조깅. ☺️ 모든 손질 작업은 저희 윤자네가 합니다.

fc2-ppv-4465686 화간령의 종청 감독, 면북미남 작가의 적모가 원작이다. 﫣 ⠀ 그래도 아주 살짝여도 눈은 눈이라고 ️ 울 똥강아지씨는 어랏. 그건 바로, 누가 봐도 남자로 정해둔 거 같은 오토바이 헬멧 캐릭을 억지스러움을 감안하면서 까지 하여울이라는 여자 캐릭터로 바꿨다는 점 때문임. 오늘은 웃짤로 달려보자 속시원한 짤방 대방출 네이버 블로그. 3년 뒤에 수리기사를 보내드리겠습니다. fc2 4409072 missav

f95 to 용산과천에 각각 1만씩 영끌공급빈 땅 다 꺼냈다부동산. 아날로그 열쇠만을 쓰는 유럽에 불만을 표하는 트윗에 달린 인용입니다. Todayis_lovable on octo 베이직한 디자인의 라운드 울 집업 입니다. Loveyoungmom19 on j 서영이가 생애 첫 뉴스에 나오다😁 현충일 달이라고 하여 원주 현충탑 견학을 갔는데 mbc에서 촬영했다고 선생님한테 전해 들었다ㅋㅋ 인터뷰까지 한건 아니지만 잠깐. 어제 크게 무리하지도 않았는데 오늘은 무릎 통증이 조금 올라와서 조금만. fc2 3825293

fc2-ppv-2927174 후루도 에리카 롯켄지마 근해를 항해 중이던 플레저 보트 「이터널 메이드 ⅱ」에서 전락. 용산과천에 각각 1만씩 영끌공급빈 땅 다 꺼냈다부동산. 응답하라 1988 정봉이 안재홍 인생짤 오늘도 memory 라는 제목아래 사랑을 시작하거나, 시작하려는 내용이 주로 나왔는데 바로 늑대의 유혹에서 나왔던. 용산과천에 각각 1만씩 영끌공급빈 땅 다 꺼냈다부동산. 용산과천에 각각 1만씩 영끌공급빈 땅 다 꺼냈다부동산. fc2 4465686

fc2ppv3518061 짤방의 어원은 디씨인사이드에서 기인한다. Com › maroooo › 224126676315웨이보로 보는 중연 하여, 요요유기 적모 크랭크 인 ft. Todayis_lovable on octo 베이직한 디자인의 라운드 울 집업 입니다. Sᴏᴏᴀ sᴇᴏᴀ on instagram 2023. Net › square › 2216607089더쿠 원덬이 우울할때 보려고 엄선해놓은 웃긴짤 모음.

fc2 뱀혀 울 고객님들은 맛있고 맛나게 드셔주시면 됩니다. 날씨가 궂을때면 아이고 다리야 하시던 울 엄니 생각나네. 19 수아_생후2086일 서아_생후1441일 우리의 6번째 결혼기념일👰‍♀️🤵 앞으로 함께 지낼 시간이 훨씬 더 많겠지만 벌써 10년이 넘는 세월을 알고 지냈다는게 참 신기한것 같다🫢 울 수아, 서아가 젤 좋아하는 양고기 집 가서. Likes, 3 comments @2_ha__mom on instagram 20221008sat🌞 태권도행사참여 태권코레오 태권도초보생 흰띠가간다 태권도에서 서울시에서 주최하는 행사가 있다고 하여 울 태권도 초보생도참여 ️ 형아. 이 사진과 함께 어떡하지라는 말 같이 보내시면 찰떡.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.