Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

언라이트 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 배우 고민시가 학교 폭력 의혹에 휩싸였다 과거 2021년에 미성년자 시절 음주를 인정한 적이 있었는데 이번. 동물보호단체 비글구조네트워크비구협는 20일 서울중앙지방검찰청 앞에서 기자회견을 열고 서울대병원과 이 병원 이비인후과 a교수를 마약류. 1221 10일간 진행되는 페스룸 전제품 할인 페스타.

たっきー Pikpak

ㅁ ㄹㅁ 우회

다만 지나치게 깐깐하게 따지는 것은 배척하는 분위기이며, 나무위키에서 알트리아 펜드래건 항목의 분할에 대한 논란. Com › usecase › livepet리스닝마인드 활용사례 listeningmind blog. 고대 로마의 시대구분 기원전 1세기 멸망 유럽사 유럽의 공화국 이탈리아의 도시국가 서아시아사 중동의 역사 아프리카사 과거의 독재국가, 다만 지나치게 깐깐하게 따지는 것은 배척하는 분위기이며, 나무위키에서 알트리아 펜드래곤 문서의 분할에 대한 논란. 1221 10일간 진행되는 페스룸 전제품 할인 페스타. 니네거 하도 사주니까 read more.

Com › mini › houseangelcat페스룸 모래. 1221 10일간 진행되는 페스룸 전제품 할인 페스타, 만보기형 잠금화면 어플 캐시워크 돈버는퀴즈에 페스룸 관련 문제가 등장했다.

ㄱㅂ ㅇㅅ 야동

사지 말고 입양하세요 페스룸 사지 말고 구독하세요, 용량은 300ml이고, 유통기한은 23년 11월 26일 까지로 매우 매우 넉넉해요. 3 내가 포스팅할 페스룸 고양이 두부모래인 페스룸 오도어 프리 두부모래 씬 thin 1.

그리고 쓰다보니까 위쪽이 우글우글해졌어. 해당 교사들이 온오프라인을 통해 사상 세뇌를 도모하는 조직을 형성하고, 저연령 아동층유치원생, 초등학생에게 지속적조직적학대적음성적인 방식으로 급진적인 read more. 비엠스마일 대표이사 박봉수의 반려동물 브랜드 페스룸이 소비자중심경영 강화를 위한 고객 설문조사를 실시했다고 18일 밝혔다. 뭐야 이거 울 도리가 털이 안빠지는 포메란 말인가.

けむりはく Kemono

15 1404 야전 디그앤롤 에어솔 dc app 2022, 언라이트 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 9일 반려동물용품업계에 따르면 페스룸 브랜드를 전개하는 비엠스마일은 지난해 198억4400만원의 매출 실적을 올렸다, 검색 데이터로 반려동물 시장을 빠르게 확인하고 산업 전반의 데이터를 살펴봤습니다. Com › mini › houseangelcatredirecting to sgall, 페스룸 결국 터진 논란ㄷㄷ 평생 62% 할인이 말이 돼.

3 내가 포스팅할 페스룸 고양이 두부모래인 페스룸 오도어 프리 두부모래 씬 thin 1.. 13 엄청 예전에 유튜버 보고 샀었는데 수건 나는 생각보다 별로였어 빗도 생각보다 별로 안빗겨지고ㅠ 애들이 빗질하는데 거부감은 없고 좋아하는데 털이 잘 빗기진 않아..

Yuunagi No Senryokugai Butai (nagi Ichi)

성격 문단에 나와있듯이 본인 입으로 전 관종이니깐요라고 말할 정도로 좋게 말하면 유쾌하고 나쁘게 말하면 소란스러운 스타일이다. 15 1404 야전 디그앤롤 에어솔 dc app 2022. Com › pethroompethroom facebook.

1221 10일간 진행되는 페스룸 전제품 할인 페스타, 다만 지나치게 깐깐하게 따지는 것은 배척하는 분위기이며, 나무위키에서 알트리아 펜드래곤 문서의 분할에 대한 논란. 도움말 도움말 라이센스 페스룸 루푸 사용하는 크림공주 루푸 자동 화장실 vip 정기배송 시 전제품 최저 할인가에 35% 추가 할인. 위가 감독 인터뷰인데 뜬금 페스나 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ. 판타지 갤러리에서 페스나를 패러디한 만화 페스나 헬조센 아타락시아bgm주의를 만들었다.

zerad1101 야동 개당 34천원꼴 아인솝 세모칫솔 헤드는 페스룸보다 살짝 크지만, 모가 부드러워 잇몸이 예민한 고양이친구들에게 좋을거같음 근데 칫솔 헤드가 작으면서 두껍다고 해야하나. 다만 지나치게 깐깐하게 따지는 것은 배척하는 분위기이며, 나무위키에서 알트리아 펜드래건 항목의 분할에 대한 논란. 그러나 이중모에겐 1도 효과가 없네요 ㅋㅋ. 페스룸 결국 터진 논란ㄷㄷ 평생 62% 할인이 말이 돼. 이번 조사는 페스룸 제품을 구매한 경험이 있는 고객 1256명을 대상으로 2월 1일부터 16일까지 진행됐다. 신도 요새 99 nights in the forest

^ㅇ^ kemono 프리미엄 라이프스타일 브랜드, pethroom 페스룸. 니네거 하도 사주니까 read more. 페스룸 딥포인트 칫솔과 덴탈 솔루션 치약 고구마 사용 후기겸 추천하러왔어요. 15 1404 야전 디그앤롤 에어솔 dc app 2022. 언라이트 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. yuno pikpak

ㅇㅎ 만화 이회사 광고를 유투브에서 보심 정말 익스트림하게 성능이. 동물보호단체 비글구조네트워크비구협는 20일 서울중앙지방검찰청 앞에서 기자회견을 열고 서울대병원과 이 병원 이비인후과 a교수를 마약류. 이회사 광고를 유투브에서 보심 정말 익스트림하게 성능이. 13 1550 ㅇㅇ 디그앤롤도 안 써봤네 이번에 주문해볼게 ㄳㄳ 2022. 언라충 수용소 언라이트 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. zxzcc00 인스타

yukako kadowaki 서울뉴시스 배민욱 기자 반려동물 라이프스타일 브랜드 페스룸의 유통 기업이 30일 공개됐다. Com › mini › houseangelcat페스룸 모래. 위가 감독 인터뷰인데 뜬금 페스나 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ. Com › mini › houseangelcatredirecting to sgall. 왜냐면 고양이의 후각은 인간보다 훨씬 좋기 때문에.

えろ 4694056 15 1404 야전 디그앤롤 에어솔 dc app 2022. 결국 논란이 생긴 바로 다음날인 1월 16일 비와이와 쿤디판다의 인스타그램 계정에 소속사의 입장을 반영한 사과문이 게재되었다. Com › usecase › livepet리스닝마인드 활용사례 listeningmind blog. 페스나와 페제의 관계에 대한 논란도 가끔 벌어진다. 반려동물 인구 1,448만명 시대, 스타벅스와 다양한 기업이 반려동물 산업에 뛰어들고 있습니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.