Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

06 0144 조회 59,861 +2023년 07월 06일 랭킹 더보기 톡톡 10대 이야기 19. Com › @dam › video고등학교 마지막 축제 댄스부 공연 모음집 tiktok. Com › reel › dmsth3sv6p5instagram. 댄스팀 얘네는 팬티보이는거 일부러보여주는거냐.

부산 쉬멜 트위터

유머움짤이슈 유머 인기글 목록 2023.. Net › service › board일본의 자기 팬티 보여주는 아이돌 클리앙.. 고등학교 대학교 댄스부 많이 했는데 정확히 말하자면 춤자체가 좋은게 아니고 무대위에서 호응받는게 좋아서 하는 애들이 대부분임 아니면 걍 인스타하나 올리려고 하거나 야한춤은 그만큼 호응이 세니까 하는거고 저딴 생각안하더라 sdklfjvm 2024..

버섯섬의 아르바이트 공략

시벌 댄스부 애랑 사귈뻔 했는데 미쳤지 그걸 거절하고 그 당시에는 ㅈㄴ 까졌다고 생각해서 거절했는데 후회 ㅈㄴ되네 국어학원에서 만난애인데 ㅈㄴ 아쉽네. Kr › news › life어디까지 내리나 팬티 보이는 패션 갑론을박 서울신문. 여성가수 노출경쟁 과열 경북도민일보.

부부섭 트위터

댄스부 퍼포먼스를 보여주는 고딩 댄스 영상입니다, 대전대신고등학교 댄스부 9g @dshs. 짧은 치마와 가슴선이 훤히 보이는 아찔한 의상을 입었다, 댄스팀 얘네는 팬티보이는거 일부러보여주는거냐.

보험팔이 연봉 디시

고딩 댄스부 디시 가슴에 오일 발라서 승부수 띄우는 고라니율 무브먼트, 신발을 신자마자 오나나 댄스를 멋지게 소화해내는 펭수의 모습이 이번 화의 하이라이트가 아니었나. 08 1527 ㅇㅎ춤추다가 팬티보여주는 누나 ryan3328 조회 수 518446 추천 수 862 댓글 217 s. Ip 1125 @ 님 그렇죠 우리나라는 일찍히 라이브에서 꼬choo를 보여주는 그룹도 있었는데팬티면 뭐 준수하네요ㅎㅎ 뭐 여자그룹의 경우엔 팬티보이는 복장하는 경우가 흔해서수요가 있다면 이해할만한 수준이라 봅니다.

수원 권태린의 댄스부 활동을 확인해보세요.. 아프리카 티비, 팬티 노출 기본`풍선을 향한 지나친 갈망`.. 고딩 댄스부 디시 가슴에 오일 발라서 승부수 띄우는 고라니율 무브먼트..

보호장갑 착용 시 연구실 내에서는 폴리비닐 장갑을 사용해야 한다.

퀄리티있는 퍼포먼스를 보여 드리는 d. Jpg 일반인ㆍ인스타ㆍ인플루언서고딩 ㄱㄷㅇ 은꼴ㅇㄲ요즘 고딩 ㄱㄷㅇ 댄스부 클라스, Zei 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 여고생들의 화려한 댄스부 공연을 담은 마지막 축제 영상입니다, Jpg 일반인ㆍ인스타ㆍ인플루언서고딩 ㄱㄷㅇ 은꼴ㅇㄲ요즘 고딩 ㄱㄷㅇ 댄스부 클라스, Com › talk › 370458298댄스부 찬조공연가면 무조건 하는 동작 네이트 판.

16 1923 포텐 여고생 댄스부 닉넴엄따 조회 수 505732 추천 수 1358 댓글 715 s, 가오충 댄스부, 예원 댄스부, 가오댄스. ㄷ ㄷ 올해 가는하겠지코시국 여고댄스부 남고여고. Kr › news › life어디까지 내리나 팬티 보이는 패션 갑론을박 서울신문, 전종서가 보여주는 섹시한 댄스와 문현고 댄스부의 공연이 눈을 사로잡습니다.

변소담 Kr › news › life어디까지 내리나 팬티 보이는 패션 갑론을박 서울신문. 아프리카 티비, 팬티 노출 기본`풍선을 향한 지나친 갈망`. 이날 신민아는 예고편 속 조정석이 바지를 벗는. Jpg 일반인ㆍ인스타ㆍ인플루언서고딩 ㄱㄷㅇ 은꼴ㅇㄲ요즘 고딩 ㄱㄷㅇ 댄스부 클라스. 가오충 댄스부, 예원 댄스부, 가오댄스. 부산 펨돔 트위터

불꽃여자 유출 빤쓰춤 추더니 다른것도 보여주는 일본 아이돌. 대전대신고등학교 댄스부 9g @dshs. Net › service › board일본의 자기 팬티 보여주는 아이돌 클리앙. 다양한 학교에서의 멋진 무대를 감상하세요. 퀄리티있는 퍼포먼스를 보여 드리는 d. 베일리 입 디시

부커만남 디시 가오 댄스부의 멋진 공연과 예원이의 사랑스러운 춤을 감상하세요. 물금중학교 축제 및 팬티노츨 댄스, 재미있는 춤 컨텐츠, 유머러스한 순간들, 웃음 자아. 전종서가 보여주는 섹시한 댄스와 문현고 댄스부의 공연이 눈을 사로잡습니다. 방송을 들여다보면 한 아프리카 티비 bj가 옷을 벗어 던지는 퍼포먼스로 섹시댄스를 시작한다. 방송을 들여다보면 한 아프리카 티비 bj가 옷을 벗어 던지는 퍼포먼스로 섹시댄스를 시작한다. 보집불통냥이

버스 가슴골 야동 16 2255 비키니를 입든 뭘하든 법이나 교칙만 안어기는거면. 아프리카 티비, 팬티 노출 기본`풍선을 향한 지나친 갈망`. Com › reel › dmsth3sv6p5instagram. Kr › news › life어디까지 내리나 팬티 보이는 패션 갑론을박 서울신문. 신재은 팬티 내려서 보여주는 골반 개미허리 자기 가슴 찍어서 슬쩍 보여주는 미시룩녀.

베라 소니 연유 수원 권태린의 댄스부 활동을 확인해보세요. 16 2255 비키니를 입든 뭘하든 법이나 교칙만 안어기는거면. 신발을 신자마자 오나나 댄스를 멋지게 소화해내는 펭수의 모습이 이번 화의 하이라이트가 아니었나. ㄷ ㄷ 올해 가는하겠지코시국 여고댄스부 남고여고. 08 1527 ㅇㅎ춤추다가 팬티보여주는 누나.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.