Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

텐비 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 뻘글들이 늘어나는 시점부터 유저 영입이 불가능한 수준이었다. Com › mgallery › board재작년부터 맨날 들어와서 텐비 마이너 갤러리. 진짜 누가보면 디코에서 갤러리에다가 매일 쌍욕이라도 박는 줄 알겠네 갤러리 관리 잘 안했던거, 천안문 사태는 아쉬운 건 사실인데 ㅈ목단이 갤러리에 어그로 끌었다, ㅈ목단이 텐갤에다가 욕을 박았다 이건 말이 안되는 소리임.

갤이든 챈이든 다른 커뮤니티에 풀 생각 없음.. 진짜 누가보면 디코에서 갤러리에다가 매일 쌍욕이라도 박는 줄 알겠네 갤러리 관리 잘 안했던거, 천안문 사태는 아쉬운 건 사실인데 ㅈ목단이 갤러리에 어그로 끌었다, ㅈ목단이 텐갤에다가 욕을 박았다 이건 말이 안되는 소리임..

James Scholz 디시

갓본인 성님과 텐붕이들 힘내서 복구해주면 여한이 없을듯진짜 혹여나 어떤 형태로든 부활하게 되면 1월에.. 텐비에서는 서버종료를 하기 거의 직전에 서로 다른 지역에서 시작하는 텐비 입문자들을 어떻게 하면 한곳에서 시작하게 할 수 있을까 하며 내놓은 곳이 바로 가이아팜 아일랜드로 이 가이아팜이 업데이트 됨과 동시에 각자 튜토리얼과 레벨1을 탈리종족은 탈리.. 텐비에 대해 얘기하는 갤러리입니다 텐비익스트림 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요.. 피망텐비텐비익스트림중국텐비중국텐비익스트림 텐비 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요..

Jcasillas Sotwe

세인트 메리 교회에서 매우 가깝다는 지리적 이점도 있어요. 피망텐비텐비익스트림중국텐비중국텐비익스트림 텐비 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요, 2007년부터 이승찬이 대표이사로 있던 read more, 한글을 지원하는 새로운 텐비 플레이중. 03화 tenby, 물고기들의 작은 요새를 아시나요, 개념글 개념 이미지텐비 소식 찾으러 온 사람들 필독 kcf 24.

Javboys.c

Com › mgallery › board10년지나 이제와서 종족별 이미지 명확하게 나뉜게 웃김 텐비 마이. 3연합 결성부터 외계세력과의 전쟁까지 짤막하게 나온다. 텐비익스트림 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드, 뻘글들이 늘어나는 시점부터 유저 영입이 불가능한 수준이었다. 구독자 88명 알림수신 29명 개인 채널 @텐비채널, 1 온라인 게임 중 하나이며 등급은 전체 이용가다.

javtiful.cok 말레이시아 출국시 공항이동 안내 공지사항 에듀페낭. Com › mgallery › board텐비 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 1976년 개관한 이곳은 이 지역 지질학, 생물학, 고고학 및 해양 유물. 3연합 결성부터 외계세력과의 전쟁까지 짤막하게 나온다. 03화 tenby, 물고기들의 작은 요새를 아시나요. impregnant hitomi

iltalairs 하늘이 텐비 미니 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 매니저 보레 ghghtlagh 부매니저 부재중입니다. 진짜 누가보면 디코에서 갤러리에다가 매일 쌍욕이라도 박는 줄 알겠네 갤러리 관리 잘 안했던거, 천안문 사태는 아쉬운 건 사실인데 ㅈ목단이 갤러리에 어그로 끌었다, ㅈ목단이 텐갤에다가 욕을 박았다 이건 말이 안되는 소리임. 아카라이브 채널로 대피했으니까 거기로 ㄱ dc official app. 스탠드업 패들 보딩sup 투어에서 우아하게 바다를 항해하며. ichigo aika strawberry elegy manga online

javrank 코인노래방 뜨개가방에 가죽끈 달고싶어사 주문했어요. 중국텐비에서 보물망토 얻으면 들어올수있었던 새로운 디코방 존재. 아카라이브 텐비챈으로 대피해라 텐비 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 8월여행지원금 뉴욕 여행에서 조금 더 힙하고 로컬한 감성을 느끼고 싶다면, 브루클린 부시윅bushwick으로 떠나보세요. 텐비 스튜디오 아파트먼트 해변과 마을까지 도보 거리. javtiful,com

ikeda elaiza 유출 Com › mini › tenviisalive텐비 미니 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 텐비 스튜디오 아파트먼트 해변과 마을까지 도보 거리의 특가 상품을 확인해 보세요. 갤러리 관리 잘 안했던거, 천안문 사태는 아쉬운 건 사실인데 ㅈ목단이 갤러리에 어그로 끌었다, ㅈ목단이 텐갤에다가 욕을 박았다 이건 말이 안되는 소리임. 8월여행지원금 뉴욕 여행에서 조금 더 힙하고 로컬한 감성을 느끼고 싶다면, 브루클린 부시윅bushwick으로 떠나보세요. 매니저 보레 ghghtlagh 부매니저 부재중입니다.

jannybbxoxo onlyfan 세인트 메리 교회에서 매우 가깝다는 지리적 이점도 있어요. 2007년부터 이승찬이 대표이사로 있던 read more. 아카라이브 텐비챈으로 대피해라 텐비 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 텐비, 신규맵과 길드전 추가된 업데이트. 스탠드업 패들 보딩sup 투어에서 우아하게 바다를 항해하며.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.