Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

295k views 2 months ago. 28 2355 소개팅에서 킴성태 만나고 느낀점 말해주는 지붕위소희. 진짜 맘에들었나보네 ㅋㅋㅋ 13 murder 2025. 한눈에 보는 오늘 방송가요 뉴스 osen박준형 기자 27일 서울 상암동 에스플레스센터에서 2025 soop 스트리머 대상 시상식이 진행됐다.

맥북 아이온2

맥심코리아 리사

Partnerbestpro 클립성태×소희 ox퀴즈 소희. 윤슬윤구 나도시부럴 3 카엘ㅁ이글스ㅁ 2025, 21 1039 윤슬윤구 아직은 빡세지 ㅋㅋㅋ 공개진결 선언은 하고 ㅋㅋㅋ 1 기원전 2025. Com › 9222956812킴성태 소희가 적극적이어서 나도 적극적으로 변했다 방송도 하나도, 한눈에 보는 오늘 방송가요 뉴스 osen박준형 기자 27일 서울 상암동 에스플레스센터에서 2025 soop 스트리머 대상 시상식이 진행됐다.

특별상 베스트 커플상을 수상한 킴성태지붕위소희가 소감을 말하고 있다, 27 2105 킴성태 베스트 커플수상소감에 들리는 김봉준 목청. 12 1914 어제자 소희 만나기전 킴성태 착장을 본 오아 잠깐만 ㅅㅂ 개 ㅈ1랄을했네. 킴성태x소희 술먹방 클립 캄성여대🌸케이리그 리아들. 킴성태 오아팀vs쪼이팀 배그킬내기얼마만이냐 배그멸망전전 폼올린다 엣치쿠배킬내기 272,205 20251227 한국어 pubg battlegrounds. Com › 9305758494성태 소희 찐결임.

매은 빨간약

05 1612 시네티 보다가 킴성태 소개팅에 터진 우왁굳ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ.. 📄방송 공지공지안녕하세요 여러분들 항상킴성태20251223 220904조회수 32 안녕하세요 여러분들 저는 집잘도착했습니다 오늘 재밌게봐주셔서 너무감사합니다 칼바람 요즘 재밋어보여서 할려고했는데 택시에서부터 쓰러졋네요 아침부터 움직여서 피곤했나봅니다ㅠ오늘은여기까지하고 내일부터.. 숲요정 근데 걔넨 딱봐도 진결이잖아 그냥 기류만 봐도 알겠던데 걔넨..

킴성태 소희 근데 내가볼땐 그냥 방송용 우결임 숲인방 미니. 20 2158 소희 베스트 커플상 받으면 솔직히 상상한 멘트 있다 없다, 6k views 1 month ago 지붕위소희 예능 킴성태 오리지널 영상은 soop 시네티에서, 킴성태 소희가 적극적이어서 나도 적극적으로 변했다 방송도 하나도 안뺀다 그리고 고마웠다 여캠이면 그런거 하면 열혈들 많이 떠나는데, 풍력이 확줄. 05 1612 시네티 보다가 킴성태 소개팅에 터진 우왁굳ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ. 윤슬윤구 나도시부럴 3 카엘ㅁ이글스ㅁ 2025.

만두 헤이안 신궁

음악,라이브,노래 20251119 214150. 킴성태 소희가 적극적이어서 나도 적극적으로 변했다 방송도, 26 0236 소희 성격이 너무 좋더라 걍 남자라면 딱히 싫어할 사람이 많이 없는 성격임 9 윤하슬기짱 2025.

26 1951 소희 진심 너무이쁨 일진상 좋아하는데 너무 부합함ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 51 6 eeorbyu 2025, 26 1951 소희 진심 너무이쁨 일진상 좋아하는데 너무 부합함ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 51 6 eeorbyu 2025. Com › view › 20251227n08805사진킴성태지붕위소희, 베스트 커플상 수상 네이트 연예, 킴성태 소희 근데 내가볼땐 그냥 방송용 우결임 숲인방 미니, 성태가 한발만 넘어가면 바로 진결임 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ.

20 2158 소희 베스트 커플상 받으면 솔직히 상상한 멘트 있다 없다. 11일 이후로 진짜로 나 이거이거 못 참겠다 진짜 이제 살구맛캔디 조회 수 107902 추천 수 120 댓글 19 s. Com › 9305758494성태 소희 찐결임. Kr › station › rrvv17항상킴성태s channel soop.

마키마 가슴 크기 숲요정 근데 걔넨 딱봐도 진결이잖아 그냥 기류만 봐도 알겠던데 걔넨. Com › entertainments › entertain_photo사진킴성태지붕위소희, 베스트 커플상 수상. 김민교는그마종자 ㄹㅇ 진결해봐서 둘다 피곤한거아니까 잘되서 소희 내리자마자 욕 박는 킴성태 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 벌써 개. Be the first to comment. Kr 킴성태지붕위소희 숲soop시네티 오리지널콘텐츠예능 pnpl55 269 킴성태 슈우우웅 보고 빵터진 소희 ㅋㅋㅋ soheestarry 16,226 누나랑. 먹토 시간 디시

마리망 검색 Kr › station › rrvv17항상킴성태s channel soop. Com › watch안 오면 내가 당길게 youtube. 특별상 베스트 커플상을 수상한 킴성태지붕위소희가 소감을 말하고 있다. 숲요정 근데 걔넨 딱봐도 진결이잖아 그냥 기류만 봐도 알겠던데 걔넨. 05 1612 시네티 보다가 킴성태 소개팅에 터진 우왁굳ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ. 마이 팬스 추천 디시

마키마 똥침 특별상 베스트 커플상을 수상한 킴성태지붕위소희가 소감을 말하고 있다. 킴성태 소희가 적극적이어서 나도 적극적으로 변했다 방송도 하나도 안뺀다 그리고 고마웠다 여캠이면 그런거 하면 열혈들 많이 떠나는데, 풍력이 확줄. 21 1039 윤슬윤구 아직은 빡세지 ㅋㅋㅋ 공개진결 선언은 하고 ㅋㅋㅋ 1 기원전 2025. Krrrvv17 광고문의 ksttv@naver. 숲요정 근데 걔넨 딱봐도 진결이잖아 그냥 기류만 봐도 알겠던데 걔넨. 맹숙 나이 디시

마키 마 급똥 항상킴성태 킴성태x소희 5분타노스 킬당7000개 데이트비용번다 여기서도못하면죽자그냥 views 199,960 times 20251225 한국어 league of legends. Com › view › 20251227n08805사진킴성태지붕위소희, 베스트 커플상 수상 네이트 연예. 27 2105 코소희 베스트 커플상 스트님 반응 감스트 발표해라 발표해. 11일 이후로 진짜로 나 이거이거 못 참겠다 진짜 이제 살구맛캔디 조회 수 107902 추천 수 120 댓글 19 s. Kr 킴성태지붕위소희 숲soop시네티 오리지널콘텐츠예능 pnpl55 269 킴성태 슈우우웅 보고 빵터진 소희 ㅋㅋㅋ soheestarry 16,226 누나랑.

마젠타 개꼴 Com › view › 20251227n08805사진킴성태지붕위소희, 베스트 커플상 수상 네이트 연예. Be the first to comment. Kongkong 1128 조회 22 좋아요 0 과연 진결일까. Com › watch안 오면 내가 당길게 youtube. 킴성태 오아팀vs쪼이팀 배그킬내기얼마만이냐 배그멸망전전 폼올린다 엣치쿠배킬내기 272,205 20251227 한국어 pubg battlegrounds.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.