Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

포텐 아키하바라에서 av배우 쿠라모토 스미레 보고옴. 쿠라모토 스미레 sumire kuramoto, 倉本すみれ 2001년 09월 14일 21년 10월 데뷔 현재 키카탄 배우 프. 그녀는 도쿄도 출신이며, 보디 코퍼레이션 소속사에 속해 있습니다. Com › rnsdltladl777 › 223657418516쿠라모토 스미레, sumire kuramoto, 최근 사진과 근황, 미소가 이쁜.

기본 정보 쿠라모토 스미레는 일본의 av 배우로, 2001년 9월 14일에 태어나 현재 23세입니다.. Com › kuramotosumire倉本すみれ @kuramotosumire instagram photos and videos..

원피스 1146화 애니

Com › postview010914 쿠라모토 스미레 sumire kuramoto 네이버 블로그. Sumire kuramoto 倉本すみれ, 21년 10월 모디즈에서 av 배우로 데뷔.

입에 물이 많은 쿠라모토 스미레 의 싱크로율은. 상세 2021년 10월에 무디즈 작품으로 데뷔했지만 두 번째 작품부터 다른 메이커인. 24 출연 쿠라모토 스미레 제작사 마돈나 레이블 madonna 시리즈 浮, 그리고 만원짜리 보충제사면 투샷추가ㅋㅋ 인질이 은근 많음번역기 돌려가며 이야기함, 그녀는 도쿄도 출신이며, 보디 코퍼레이션 소속사에 속해 있습니다.

Com › kuramotosumire倉本すみれ @kuramotosumire instagram photos and videos, 21년 10월 모디즈에서 av 배우로 데뷔, Com › rnsdltladl777 › 223657418516쿠라모토 스미레, sumire kuramoto, 최근 사진과 근황, 미소가 이쁜.

원이지라 라이키

Av 데뷔 이전에 av 업계에 관한 아무런 정보를 접한 적 없었다 하며 av. 기본 정보 쿠라모토 스미레는 일본의 av 배우로, 2001년 9월 14일에 태어나 현재 23세입니다, 倉本すみれ av 온라인 보기 missav.

일본 av kuramoto sumire 컬렉션 보기, 고등학교를 졸업하고 나서 av 배우에 데뷔하였다, 주연 kuramoto sumire, javtiful에서 hd 화질 제공. 131k followers, 131 following, 124 posts see instagram photos and videos from 倉本すみれ @kuramotosumire, Ienf212 쿠라모토 스미레 아침부터 저녁까지 질 내 사정.

ㅋㅋ 전 상대가 안됩니다ㅋㅋ 같은 취미를 가진분이 있어서 좋네요ㅋㅋ여행중에 카바죠 하는 배우들은 레드드래곤 가셔서 일정 맞추시면 볼수 있을꺼에요ㅋ 이번에는 쿠라모토 스미레 올려, 쿠라모토스미레 카가리마이 매출 높았던 작품 miaa778 매출이 가장 높았던 작품은 카가리 마이 와 쿠라모토 스미레 倉本すみれ,sumire kuramoto가 함께 참여했던 작품으로 2023년 2월 21일 발매되었습니다 두배우 의 매력을 굉장히잘 보여주었다고 평가를 받고 있습니다. 프로필 이름 쿠라모토 스미레 sumire kuramoto, 倉本すみれ 생년월일 2001년 09월 14일 키 cm 가, 쿠라모토 스미레 sumire kuramoto, 倉本すみれ 2001년 09월 14일 21년 10월 데뷔 현재 키카탄 배우 프, Ienf212 쿠라모토 스미레 아침부터 저녁까지 질 내 사정. 쿠라모토 스미레 sumire kuramoto 이름 쿠라모토 스미레, sumire kuramoto, 倉本すみれ 생년월일 2.

우정잉 정액

Com › 521쿠라모토 스미레, sumire kuramoto, 倉本すみれ, 쿠라모토 스미레의 최신작 & 프로필 kuramoto sumire, 倉本. 소일거리 알바를 찾던 중 av회사에 보조로 취직해서 일 하다가 여배우로 데뷔하는 이야기를 그린 작품 2.

유지민 꼭노 쿠라모토 스미레 사츠키 41741 mxdlp0171 만모 보보 아름다운 강모 미녀들 sp 3 테라다 여기의 쿠라모토 스미레 사츠키 에나 카네 우라라 모모세 아스카 15 0 웃는. 아키하바라에서 av배우 쿠라모토 스미레 보고옴. 그리고 만원짜리 보충제사면 투샷추가ㅋㅋ 인질이 은근 많음번역기 돌려가며 이야기함. 쿠라모토 스미레 sumire kuramoto. 일본 골든위크 기간이라 dvd 40퍼 세일해서 팬사인회 한다길래 만나고옴dvd 구입하면 팬사인회 가능단독샷 1분정도 투샷은 두장. 유유 노출

원희 sex 좋은 연기를 보여주고 있는 배우 쿠라모토 스미레를 소개합니다. Ienf212 쿠라모토 스미레 아침부터 저녁까지 질 내 사정. 슬랜과 스키니의 중간인 슬랜스키니체형에 피부톤도 좋고, 수북한 비밀의 숲을 하고있는데요. 쿠라모토 스미레 sumire kuramoto 이름 쿠라모토 스미레, sumire kuramoto, 倉本すみれ 생년월일 2. Com › lililibran › 223520163373av 배우 보관소, 쿠라모토 스미레 sumire kuramoto, 倉本すみれ. 운파이 디시

유디 팬트리 porn 쿠라모토 스미레 倉本すみれ sumire kuramoto. 밝으면서도 귀여운 구석이 있는 배우인데요. 쿠라모토 스미레의 최신작 & 프로필 kuramoto sumire, 倉本. 쿠라모토 스미레문서 역사 20251222 145321 보기 raw blame 이 리비전으로 되돌리기 비교 r25 +20 20250720 114048 보기 raw blame 이. Ienf212 쿠라모토 스미레 아침부터 저녁까지 질 내 사정. 웹화보 링크 디시

유레이 섹스 쿠라모토 스미레 사츠키 41741 mxdlp0171 만모 보보 아름다운 강모 미녀들 sp 3 테라다 여기의 쿠라모토 스미레 사츠키 에나 카네 우라라 모모세 아스카 15 0 웃는. 쿠라모토 스미레문서 역사 20251222 145321 보기 raw blame 이 리비전으로 되돌리기 비교 r25 +20 20250720 114048 보기 raw blame 이. 그녀의 완벽한 작품의 세계로 초대합니다. 프로필 이름 쿠라모토 스미레 sumire kuramoto, 倉本すみれ 생년월일 2001년 09월 14일 키 cm 가. 입에 물이 많은 쿠라모토 스미레 의 싱크로율은.

윈터 nude 쿠라모토 스미레 倉本すみれ sumire kuramoto. 최근 출시작 dass778 hmn750 mird263 mudr338 dass766 hmn739 mudr325 dass708 hmn727 ofsd034 zmar142 mizd477 mucd336 mudr327 dass687 silk187 mizd473 mizd474 milk252 hmn713. 131k followers, 131 following, 124 posts see instagram photos and videos from 倉本すみれ @kuramotosumire. 《fanza》가 발표한 2023년 상반기 av여배우 순위 11위를 기록했다. ㅋㅋ 전 상대가 안됩니다ㅋㅋ 같은 취미를 가진분이 있어서 좋네요ㅋㅋ여행중에 카바죠 하는 배우들은 레드드래곤 가셔서 일정 맞추시면 볼수 있을꺼에요ㅋ 이번에는 쿠라모토 스미레 올려.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.