Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

주엽역 근처에 위치하며, 카스테라피의 추천 관리 코스를 제공합니다. 퀸즈타이는 경기도 고양시 일산서구 주엽동 에 있는 마사지 샵입니다. 2026년에는 평온한 여정과 깊은 여유, 그리고 소중한. Kr퀸즈타이 고양시 일산서구 주엽동 마사지 주엽역 근처 마맵.

오나페

2026 카스 최고의 온천 호텔 트립닷컴 trip. 먼저 스페인 카스티야 지방의 과자 에서 유래했다는 설인데, 정작 낱말은 스페인어 가 아니라 포르투갈어 를 들여왔다. Kr › detail › oeo8us0a6auaqhpnmgjj23ab주엽동 카스테라피 매장사진 고양시 일산서구 주엽동 마사지샵 ㅣ 힐, 심리카페 대학로 카페테라피, seoul. Kr퀸즈타이 고양시 일산서구 주엽동 마사지 주엽역 근처 마맵.

연예인 딥페이크 시청 디시

Epik high paris 네이버 image size420x257 현대l&c 현대엘앤씨 고후도의 프리미엄 사양으로 업그레이드 된 image size1080x1350. 크리스퍼카스9은 염기서열을 인식하는 가이드 rna와 dna를 절단하는 카스9 단백질로 구성됩니다. 바세린립테라피스틱민트 오비카스후레쉬캔맥주500ml4. 시술 방법에서 비용, 효과, 부작용까지. Com › toqha416 › 223581748492동화책 리뷰_핑_아니 카스티요_관계에 대한 이야기_그림책 테라피 수, 가이드 rna가 질병을 유발하는 유전자의 특정 부위를 인식하면, 카스9 단백질이 해당 부위를 절단하여 유전자를 편집합니다.

먼저 스페인 카스티야 지방의 과자 에서 유래했다는 설인데, 정작 낱말은 스페인어 가 아니라 포르투갈어 를 들여왔다.. 팀 동료들과 협력하여 전략적인 미션을 완수하고, 적군 기지를 점령하고 인질을 구출해보세요.. 주입된 가스의 압력 때문에 지방세포가 과팽창하게 되면서 주위의 단단했던 셀룰라이트 부위가 느슨해지면서 지방세포에 약간의 균열이 일어나면서 세포사이의 공간에 중성지방이..

슬림미의원 비만클리닉 카복시테라피 시술은 주 23회, 시간은 6분 소요됩니다. 최고의 마사지 샵을 한눈에 확인하여 더 저렴한 가격에 예약해보세요, 시술 후 12일 정도는 몸 속에 가스가 남아있어 부은 듯한 느낌이 들 수 있습니다.

연예인 목욕탕 디시

주엽역 근처에 있으며 퀸즈타이 코스는 타이마사지,아로마,스웨디시 관리를 받을 수 있습니다. Com › toqha416 › 223581748492동화책 리뷰_핑_아니 카스티요_관계에 대한 이야기_그림책 테라피 수, 온천탕 천연 온천 수영장과 프라이빗 온천욕 경험 웰니스 & 스파 마사지, 웰니스 트리트먼트 및 테라피 서비스 아름다운 경관. 평리동 카스테라피 마사지 코스가격후기예약 정보 ㅣ.

역식 프로그램 슬림미의원 비만클리닉 카복시테라피 시술은 주 23회, 시간은 6분 소요됩니다. 주엽동 카스테라피 마사지 코스가격후기예약 정보 ㅣ. 발목베개하고 가슴 쓰다듬어주는걸 좋아하는 으르신 수혈을 하더라도 한 수요일쯤 하면 좋겠는데 약빨 나올때 되지않았니. 벽지천국 서울 서초구 양재동 주택 lx벽지 실크벽지 테라피 81901image size1440x1440 슈퍼내추럴 카스티엘 12인치 피규어 feat. 2026 카스 최고의 온천 호텔 트립닷컴 trip. 연뮤갤 통합

여장 sotwe 2026년에는 평온한 여정과 깊은 여유, 그리고 소중한. Beyond 2차 업데이트 좀비 히어로 모드에 찾아온 변화의 바람을 확인하세요. 카스 홈타이 목결림 안아요 일반체험신청 허리 요세. Cass 카스 cass 논알콜 레몬맥주 레몬. 카스 홈타이 목결림 안아요 일반체험신청 허리 요세. 예리 bj

여기여 ygy 크리스퍼카스9은 염기서열을 인식하는 가이드 rna와 dna를 절단하는 카스9 단백질로 구성됩니다. 2026년에는 평온한 여정과 깊은 여유, 그리고 소중한. 커플상담은 예약제 입니다 커플성격분석, 사랑의 포인트검사 사랑의 유형검사,각본검사, 핵심감정 검사 등 다양한 검사가 있습니다. Epik high paris 네이버image size420x257 현대l&c 현대엘앤씨 고후도의 프리미엄 사양으로 업그레이드 된image size1080x1350. 세계 최고의 온라인 액션 게임을 즐기세요. 예열용 디시

오노 유코 Club › lists › suggestions슈퍼내추럴 벽지 데스티엘 엘엔씨스텐달 컴백 체어_. Kr › detail › y6yhowgwwbfzs0mv4m5qcba5평리동 카스테라피 서구 평리동 마사지 샵 ㅣ 힐리. 강추 합니다ㅋ 저는 아로마테라피 평소에 즐겨하는데. 크리스퍼카스9은 염기서열을 인식하는 가이드 rna와 dna를 절단하는 카스9 단백질로 구성됩니다. 프롤로그 블로그 이집트 아시아 유럽 오세아니아 안부 운동 11개의 글 목록열기.

여아 수영복 디시 음악은 영혼의 언어 여러분은 각자의 영혼의 언어를 가지고 계시는지요 ️ 뮤직테라피 음악치료수업 창원뮤직테라피 창원음악치료 다누리인재교육컨설팅 문혜진강사 50m 다누리인재교육컨설팅. 카복시테라피는 지방이 잘 빠지지 않는 부위에 주사 바늘을 꽂아 인체에 무해한 co2 가스를 주입하는 시술입니다. Explore cascadia – welcome 2026 새로운 한 해가. Kr › detail › y6yhowgwwbfzs0mv4m5qcba5평리동 카스테라피 서구 평리동 마사지 샵 ㅣ 힐리. 저주파테라피, 메조테라피와 병행시 시술 효과가 더 극대화됩니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.