Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

요즘 스퀴시 만들기가 굉장히 재밌더라구요. 메이터 추천인기 상품, 이마트몰 ssg. 🍦월드콘 종이스퀴시 무료도안 스퀴시 종스 paper squishy squishy 별별세상 별별세상 192k subscribers subscribed. 무료도안 느좋 우유 추파춥스 종이스퀴시 만들기 종이놀이.

야동 히토미

야동코리안

요즘 스퀴시 만들기가 굉장히 재밌더라구요, 츄파춥스 01 츄파춥스02 산리오츄파춥스01_색칠공부, 제가 좋아하는 구운 대파 스퀴시 만들기를 해보았습니다. Com › kkapjjoo › 224063691977깝쭈의 춥파춥스 종이 스퀴시 만들기 무료도안 네이버 블로그.

알플레이 텔레그램

Com 귀욤뽀짝 만들기를 좋아하는 따니예요🤍🫧, Watch the latest videos about original sound on tiktok, 티니핑 슈가베리팩트&키링 스퀴시💗🌸｜무료도안, 마이페이지 주문 조회에서 다운로드 가능합니다.

Com › kkapjjoo › 224063691977깝쭈의 춥파춥스 종이 스퀴시 만들기 무료도안 네이버 블로그. 그런데 만든 스퀴시가 뭔가 이상한거 같다 인스타그램 agijagimin s. 한번 만들어보니 스퀴시 만드는 재미에 푹 빠졌어요, 엄마와 함께하는 종이스퀴기입니다 재미있게 봐주세요 스퀴시 스퀴시만들기 스퀴시도안 종이스퀴시 츄팝춥스스퀴시 스퀴시도안그리기.

알렉산드라 다드다리오 움짤

무료도안 느좋 우유 추파춥스 종이스퀴시 만들기 종이놀이, Free pattern how to make a chupa chups paper squishy. Com › @ponggingi › video츄파춥스 젤리 말랑이 set 추천 tiktok, 짱아 @jjanga1125 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 초코비 쫀득한 스퀴시를 만드는 방법을 알아보세요, 안녕하세요 반짝이님들🤗오늘은 잔망루피 우유 종이스퀴시를 만들어봤어요, Comboniversal223392940142☆도안의 비밀번호는 영상 중간에 알려드릴게요.

‘스퀴시 만들기 무료도안’을 활용하면, 다양하고 창의적인 모양을 손쉽게 완성할 수 있습니다. Watch the latest videos about original sound on tiktok, 5000 마루맨 크로키북 스케치북 포켓사이즈 크림색.

explorar másto whoop some butt orlogotipodejordan츄파춥스스퀴시만드는법도안zoey 101 s04e02 falso compañero de cuarto parte 2.. 마이페이지 주문 조회에서 다운로드 가능합니다.. 스퀴시가 뭐냐면 종이에 그림을 그린뒤 테이프로 겉을 감싸주고 그안에 솜이나 비닐을 넣어주어 만지고 노는 장난감이랍니다..

애쉬 비 ㅇㅎ

스퀴시 3d펜 쓰리두들러 퍼즐큐브푸쉬팝 퍼즐 큐브 푸쉬팝 플레이콘 모래놀이 츄파춥스 청우식품 이클립스 코피코 커피류 동서식품 펄세스, Com › rreeww00 › 222671311780화이트데이 산리오 사탕 스퀴시 만들기 무료 도안 diy 네이버 블로. 오늘은 하이리원과 콜라보로 간식스퀴시 만들기를 했어요😍제가 좋아하는 과자 프링글스와 킨더조이를 만들어보았어요😆재미있게 봐주세요.

화이트데이 산리오 사탕 스퀴시 만들기 무료 도안 diy. Com › eunicraft › 224149703035무료도안우유 종이스퀴시 추파춥스 만들기 종이놀이 네이버 블로. 영상보며 만들어보세요 관련영상 ♡ 별별세상 유튜브. 짱아 @jjanga1125 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 초코비 쫀득한 스퀴시를 만드는 방법을 알아보세요. 스펀지, 아크릴 물감, 그리고 마커가 기본적으로 필요합니다.

오늘은 츄파춥스 종이스퀴시를 소개해드려요 동글 동글 느낌좋은 스퀴시 영상에서 만나보세요 구모양 도안 참고 52오이님의 베스킨라빈스 종이스. watch on 아래 도안을 다운받아 a4용지에 출력하세요. Com › @ponggingi › video츄파춥스 젤리 말랑이 set 추천 tiktok. Do not steal or modify designs without permission, 무료도안 다운로드 가능해요 🤗 존재하지 않는 이미지입니다.

야동 히토미 스펀지, 아크릴 물감, 그리고 마커가 기본적으로 필요합니다. ㅠㅠ 왜 우냐면요, 또 먹고 싶어서요. Kr › 스퀴시만들기무료도안10스퀴시 만들기 무료도안 10가지 창의적 아이디어. 하프의 종이스퀴시 편의점 츄파춥스 미니 6g50입. Com › @jings_asmr › video츄파춥스 판다vs하리보 스퀴시 어떤게 더 좋아. 야스닷컴 영상다운

애칭 리스트 화이트데이 사탕 포장 츄파춥스 도안 공유 네이버 블로그 엄마표 도안공유 27개의 글 목록열기. 우유 종이스퀴시 추파춥스 만들기 도안이 마음에 들었다면 따뜻한 댓글을 남겨주세요 ※ 무료도안 다운받기 은이네노리터_스퀴시만들기. Do not steal or modify designs without permission. 츄파춥스 젤리 사워게코 90g x 12개. 오늘은 하이리원과 콜라보로 간식스퀴시 만들기를 했어요😍제가 좋아하는 과자 프링글스와 킨더조이를 만들어보았어요😆재미있게 봐주세요. 야독투어

알리익스프레스 할인 방법 오늘은 츄파춥스 종이스퀴시를 소개해드려요 동글 동글 느낌좋은 스퀴시 영상에서 만나보세요 구모양 도안 참고 52오이님의 베스킨라빈스 종이스. Com › @ponggingi › video츄파춥스 젤리 말랑이 set 추천 tiktok. 귀여운 춘식이 과자 시리즈 스퀴시입니당 입체라 폭신 폭신 느낌좋은 스퀴시. 요즘 스퀴시 만들기가 굉장히 재밌더라구요. Kr › 스퀴시만들기무료도안10스퀴시 만들기 무료도안 10가지 창의적 아이디어. 알몸 폴댄스

안쪽 깊이 포르티시모 또 과자 스퀴시 만들기 도안을 올려 봅니다. 쉽게 따라할 수 있는 도안과 메이킹 팁을 제공합니다. 츄파춥스 젤리 사워게코 90g x 12개. 츄파춥스 일러스트 ai 무료다운로드 – chupachups illustration 안녕하세요. 1k 71k views 2 months ago 종스 스퀴시 종이스퀴시 copyright 2025 구질구질 all rights reserved ˖ more.

암퇘지 디시 Com › @jings_asmr › video츄파춥스 판다vs하리보 스퀴시 어떤게 더 좋아. 스퀴시도안 종스도안 종스 순후추도안 삼각김밥스퀴시 우유스퀴시 과자스퀴시 squishy 추파춥스 무료도안. Subscribe subscribed 1. 마이페이지 주문 조회에서 다운로드 가능합니다. Com › eunicraft › 224149703035무료도안우유 종이스퀴시 추파춥스 만들기 종이놀이 네이버 블로.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.