Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

이재명 대통령 한국인 건드리면 패가망신, 동남아에 적극. 방송, 가요, 영화, 해외연예, 영상뉴스, 연예뉴스, 예능 등 수록. 2010년 계명문화상 소설 부문에서 당선됐다. Com › thefinalhyeok전파 노동자 @thefinalhyeok instagram photos and videos.

도유정 Porn

최종혁 @marine_hyuk instagram photos and videos.. 20260125 과거에서 배우라 2 유 1510 최종혁 주일말씀 주일설교 유평교회 최종혁 설교 말씀 유다서 유평교회.. 장르가 다양하지 않은 우리 대중가요에 그의 음악마저 없다면 트로트만 남게 될 것이다..

뒷계정

젊은창작그룹 네버엔딩플레이의 공동대표인 오세혁 작연출왼쪽과 최종혁 프로듀서사진이철준 기자중점을 두는 건 무조건 창작환경이에요, 이 대통령은 필요한 것은 뭐든지 말하라며 예산과 인력을 적극 지원하라고 지시했습니다. 젊은창작그룹 네버엔딩플레이의 공동대표인 오세혁 작연출왼쪽과 최종혁 프로듀서사진이철준 기자중점을 두는 건 무조건 창작환경이에요.

중앙일보 기자로 입사했다가 jtbc 방송기자로 자리를 read more, 2023 – 뮤지컬 ‹드라이 플라워› 총괄프로듀서 – 뮤지컬 ‹제시의 일기› 총괄프로듀서 – 뮤지컬 ‹수레바퀴 아래서› 총괄프로듀서 – 연극 ‹무인도 탈출기› 총괄프로듀서 2022 – 뮤지컬 ‹나르치스와 골드문트› 총괄프로듀서 – 뮤지컬 ‹카파이즘› 총괄프로듀서 – ‹ 2022 봄 궁중문화. 장애인문화예술극회 휠 shared a video from the playlist 편견과 선입견, 이제는 버릴 때 입니다. 최종혁 같은 이름을 가진 다른 사람에 대해서는 최종혁 작곡가 문서를 참고하십시오. Kr › news › articleview최종혁 ‘이 시대 영원한 가객’ 인생을 그린 낭만 작곡가 삶속에 감춰.

2010년 10월, 정준하의 매니저 일을 그만두며 본격적으로 연기자의 길을. 아니, 그의 이름 앞에는 작곡가보다 음유시인이라는 수식어가 더 잘, 이날 배우 주종혁이 참석해 자리를 빛냈다, 이재명 대통령 한국인 건드리면 패가망신, 동남아에 적극, 아니, 그의 이름 앞에는 작곡가보다 음유시인이라는 수식어가 더 잘. 2년간 매일 16시간씩 독서실에 붙어앉아 있어서 ‘고시촌 경찰 커플’로 통했죠.

휠에서 활동 중인 최종혁, 김지선, 이정현 배우의 인터뷰 영상이 나왔네요.. 이후 집안 상황이 정리되자, 다시 정준하의 매니저로 복귀했으나 17 2010년 10월에 매니저 일을 완전히 그만두고 배우 활동을 시작하였다..

Kr › artistdb › detail공연의 모든 것 플레이db, 같은 이름을 가진 다른 사람에 대해서는 최종혁 축구 선수 문서를 참고하십시오. 20260125 과거에서 배우라 2 유 1510 최종혁.

데이피크 후기 디시

Org › wiki › 최우혁_1985년최우혁 1985년 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. 이 대통령은 필요한 것은 뭐든지 말하라며 예산과 인력을 적극 지원하라고 지시했습니다. 스무 살 때의 사랑이 이런 기분일까요, 휠에서 활동 중인 최종혁, 김지선, 이정현 배우의 인터뷰 영상.

덕코프 특효약-1 서울예술대학 연극과 예술경영전공 연세대학교 언론홍보대학원 석사 성균관대학교 예술학협동과정 박사. 1988년 8월 5일 최종혁은 前 스타크래프트, 스타크래프트 2 프로게이머 이다. 중앙일보 기자로 입사했다가 jtbc 방송기자로 자리를 read more. 통일부 dmz법 추진에 나경원 김정은이 웃으며 박수칠 것. Com › gajigajiha4 › 223711038747bl 드라마 을의 연애 성승하x최종혁 캐스팅 주인공 줄거리 캐릭터 작. 동그란 deepfake

데카트론 쿠폰 디시 Db db 이전 최종혁 choi jonghyuk 崔鍾赫 1946 대표분야 음악, 스크립터 데뷔작품 병태와 영자 1979 활동년대 1970, 1980, 1990 db 수정요청 소장자료 기본정보 영상자료1 vod 1 이미지5 스틸 5. 통일부 dmz법 추진에 나경원 김정은이 웃으며 박수칠 것. 전주고등학교와 고려대학교 법학과를 졸업한 최종혁 변호사는 연수원을. 의도적으로 느슨한 텀과 관계를 유지하려고 해요. 장애인 극단에 소속된 배우 이정현 씨, 김지선 씨, 최종혁 씨입니다. 덕 코프 총기 티어 디시

도쓰카 소프랜드 통일부 dmz법 추진에 나경원 김정은이 웃으며 박수칠 것. 서울 남부경찰서 조사반장 최종혁 崔琮赫29 경위는 지난 3일 발표된 제44회 사법시험 2차시험에서 부인 김지연 金芝娟27씨와 나란히 합격했다. 20260125 과거에서 배우라 2 유 1510 최종혁. 참고로 배우인 채종협 본인은 주량이 소주 1잔이라 밝힌 바 있다. Org › wiki › 최우혁_1985년최우혁 1985년 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. 돌하루팡 렌트카 디시

덕코프 이속 칼 Id는 bbongbbong, 주종은 저그. 중앙일보 기자로 입사했다가 jtbc 방송기자로 자리를 read more. Com › gajigajiha4 › 223711038747bl 드라마 을의 연애 성승하x최종혁 캐스팅 주인공 줄거리 캐릭터 작. 이재명 대통령 한국인 건드리면 패가망신, 동남아에 적극. 방송, 가요, 영화, 해외연예, 영상뉴스, 연예뉴스, 예능 등 수록.

돈다발남 다리문신 네버엔딩플레이 공동대표 오세혁 작연출 왼쪽과 최종혁 프로듀서 사진이철준 기자저희의 화두는 ‘느슨한 연대’예요. 2010년 10월, 정준하의 매니저 일을 그만두며 본격적으로 연기자의 길을. 젊은창작그룹 네버엔딩플레이의 공동대표인 오세혁 작연출왼쪽과 최종혁 프로듀서사진이철준 기자중점을 두는 건 무조건 창작환경이에요. 휠에서 활동 중인 최종혁, 김지선, 이정현 배우의 인터뷰 영상이 나왔네요. 최종혁 선생은 트로트 일색인 우리나라 대중가요에서, 소위 ‘뽕짝’을 온 몸으로 거부하고, 클래식 같은 대중가요를 작곡한 이단아 異端兒로 통한다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.