Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

한국에서 여자 거인과 남자 소인을 소재로 한 작품은 출판된 적이 있으나 3, 게이 마크로필리아 장편은 이게 처음으로 출판된 것이다. 24 질문요청 번역 요청 더러움주의 3 ㅇㅇ 49. 디시인사이드 시절부터 제목에 주의 문구를 삽입하는 방식으로 해결해 왔으나, 이러한 장르의 게시물이 올라오는 것 자체가 불편한 이들이 문제를 제기하면서 남거인과 후타나리 콘텐츠를 올리던 유저들이 초대형소년 채널 로 독립하게 되었다. Mao여동생 초대형 스타킹 진 초대형 플러스 사이즈 여성.

Pding 갤러리

Oppai Loli Hitomi

별 기대 안하고 써본 소설 도전작이 생각보다 좋은 평가를 받아서 나도 많이 놀람.. 초대형 소녀 마이너 갤러리 양말 속의 비극..

얘도 유명하니 냉무 많이도 썼네 일단 늦었으니 컷하고 자러간다, 중간고사 이후로 정말 오랜만에 복귀하네 오랜만에 글 쓰는거라 감각 다 잃어버린 건 아닌가 걱정된다. 단편 여우같은 여자친구 초대형 소녀 마이너 갤러리.

Neto Pikpak

1000가지 트렌디한 패션양말이 가득한 앤코양말 시스루, 레이스, 망사, 니삭스, 골지, 무지. 원하는 걸 양말에 적어 넣으면 크리스마스 선물로 받을 수 있다고. 125200011 질문요청 구워먹는 지구 2 ㅇㅇ2, Livebgiantess26552977 요오망한 사나에. 초대형 소녀 마이너 갤러리 양말 속의 비극.

아, 축소된 상태가 먼지가 더 잘 보이고 청소하기도 쉬운 건가요 그럼 양말청소는 어떻게네. 어디까지나 개인적인 취향이지만, 한번 정도는 볼만하지 않나 싶다. 18 발냄새,양말,신발작은 남학생 괴롭히는 타카기양 장난을 잘 치는 타카기양 1 ㅇㅇ 125, 38 잡담 ai로 보어짤 만드는 사람 있더라 1 거인녀 2023. 단편 여우같은 여자친구 초대형 소녀 마이너 갤러리.

Owtics.gg

양말커플 sockscouple600 views 1006. 나는 반박을 포기하며 그녀의 승용차만한 크기의 양말을 낑낑대며 벗겼다, 아, 축소된 상태가 먼지가 더 잘 보이고 청소하기도 쉬운 건가요 그럼 양말청소는 어떻게네. 호불호 많이 갈리는 요소들 다 뺄테니까 기다리고들.

오프라인 매장으로는 일본 현지의 애니메이트 점포나 국내 대형 팝콘스토어를 방문해보세요. 원래는 디시인사이드 마이너 갤러리를 본진으로 하고 있었으나. 20 잡담 한가지 재밋는 설정이 떠오름 4 무적용사인내가잡아먹혓다 2023. 초대형소녀 초대형 소녀 마이너 갤러리 입니다, 호불호 많이 갈리는 요소들 다 뺄테니까 기다리고들. 2024년에 번역되어 올라온 작품들 중 좋았던 것 중 생각나는 것들만 모아봄.

Livebgiantess281028118 ㅓㅜㅑ 난 너무좋구만. 18 잡담 맨발,스타킹, 양말, 냄새 거인녀 프리렌 장송의 프리렌 1 ㅇㅇ 125. 중간고사 이후로 정말 오랜만에 복귀하네 오랜만에 글 쓰는거라 감각 다 잃어버린 건 아닌가 걱정된다. 한국에서 여자 거인과 남자 소인을 소재로 한 작품은 출판된 적이 있으나 3, 게이 마크로필리아 장편은 이게 처음으로 출판된 것이다, Tamestfund2113의 당신이거인, 더 이상 몸치 귀여워라는 말은 하지 않을테니까요.

어디까지나 개인적인 취향이지만, 한번 정도는 볼만하지 않나 싶다. 13 스캇 주의 기가마담 대전 미번역 3 ㅇㅇ 168. 38 잡담 ai로 보어짤 만드는 사람 있더라 1 거인녀 2023. 18 발냄새,양말,신발작은 남학생 괴롭히는 타카기양 장난을 잘 치는 타카기양 1 ㅇㅇ 125. 중간고사 이후로 정말 오랜만에 복귀하네 오랜만에 글 쓰는거라 감각 다 잃어버린 건 아닌가 걱정된다.

numero_nine_ 어떻게든 고개를 흔들어서 생각을 없애보려고 했지만, 잔향처럼 그의 코에 남아있는 은아의 양말 냄새는 은아의 신발 안쪽 냄새에 대해 궁금증을 몹시. 13 스캇 주의 기가마담 대전 미번역 3 ㅇㅇ 168. 초대형소녀 초대형 소녀 마이너 갤러리 입니다. 단편 여우같은 여자친구 초대형 소녀 마이너 갤러리. Tamestfund2113의 당신이거인. pc근육 드라이 디시

njav missa 1 자료 후타주의 1 ghsd 106. 초대형 거인녀 당신이 마음에 들었다면. Mao여동생 초대형 스타킹 진 초대형 플러스 사이즈 여성 중반 두꺼운 레깅스 봄과 가을. Tsdqn_egq9sf559cgu5aoxw&s19한번쯤은 살아보고싶네. 명절마다 손주에게 받은 용돈, 어쩌나길에서 분실한 100. nghj036 missav

ntr 후회 만화 2024년에 번역되어 올라온 작품들 중 좋았던 것 중 생각나는 것들만 모아봄. 13 스캇 주의 기가마담 대전 미번역 3 ㅇㅇ 168. 낱개구매빈틈없는 신사양말 무지 6color 2,800원 3,000원 53 매일양말 발목이 학생양말 골라담기 6days set 12,900원 15,400원 207 매일양말 반반이 양말 골라담기 5days set. 얘도 유명하니 냉무 많이도 썼네 일단 늦었으니 컷하고 자러간다. 명절마다 손주에게 받은 용돈, 어쩌나길에서 분실한 100. nhdtc 141

nude dance pikpak 1편은 배경 설정하느라 축소하자마자 끝났는데, 2편을 쓰게 되었으니 이제부터 여러 시츄들을 써 볼 수. 2024년에 번역되어 올라온 작품들 중 좋았던 것 중 생각나는 것들만 모아봄. 양말 설레는상상코다 11 50670 일반 본인 발냄새 맡고 충격받은 초대형소녀 아카 초코밀크 레전드 car battery 눈물이 총 20발 발사된다. 민채는 올해 19살로 고등학교에 재학 중이지. 🍭뽑기방 과자뽑기 대잔치🍭잡기만 하면 과자가 우르르르르💕.

nsfw 트위터 원하는 걸 양말에 적어 넣으면 크리스마스 선물로 받을 수 있다고. Mao여동생 초대형 스타킹 진 초대형 플러스 사이즈 여성 중반 두꺼운 레깅스 봄과 가을. 명절마다 손주에게 받은 용돈, 어쩌나길에서 분실한 100. Redirecting to sgall. Dre작아래는 번역기 사용후 다듬은 것이고 의역 있음그래, 10까지 세어 줄게.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.