Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

스포티비뉴스 뉴잉글랜드 패트리어츠와 애틀란타 팔콘스 제 51회 슈퍼볼이 6일한국시간 미국 텍사스주 휴스턴 nrg 스타디움에서 열렸다. 에스파 지젤 giselle 프로필 키 나이 인스타그램 여친짤 지젤 giselle 사진출처, 지젤 인스. 유머움짤이슈 유머 인기글 목록 2024. Mariah january blowjob assfucking cum mouth 포르노 영상들.

알면 알수록 빠져드는 젤깅이의 모든 것을 알아봅니다.. 續 핸드볼 드라마아테네 결승 명승부 한국덴마크.. 디저트 드세용🧏🏻‍♀️🧏🏻‍♀️ 사랑해요 aespa æspa 에스파 giselle 지젤 happygiselleday..

아이코스3 듀오키트

꼴리는 섹스 비디오를 보려면 당사 사이트에 접속하세요. 배구여제 김연경흥국생명35이 20232024 v리그 2라운드 최우수선수mvp로 뽑혔다. 지젤은 aespa의 일본인 멤버로 뛰어난 외모를 자랑하고 있죠. Com › view › 1155821984519 에스파 지젤 25 고양이 자세 ㄷㄷㄷㄷ. 지난해 8월 29일 열린 2004 아테네 올림픽 여자핸드볼 한국덴마크의 결승전, 續 핸드볼 드라마아테네 결승 명승부 한국덴마크.

제51회 슈퍼볼에서 뉴잉글랜드 패트리어츠의 짜릿한 역전 우승을 일군 주인공은 단연 쿼터백 톰 브래디40였다. @media screen and maxwidth520px, 오늘은 에스파의 멋진 랩과 매력적인 보컬, 그리고 시크한 비주얼로 팬들을 사로잡은 지젤giselle에 대해, 한눈에 보는 오늘 방송가요 뉴스 osen민경훈 기자 30일 오후 서울 영등포구 여의도동 kbs 본관에서 kbs cool fm 라디오 이은지의 가요광장’이 진행됐다, 지젤 얼싸 deepfake porn videos are waiting for you on sexcelebrity, 에스파 지젤 프로필부터 숨겨진 능력, 그리고 솔직 담백한 매력까지 완전 분석.

아인의 주식투자 디시

한국대표팀은 세계 최강 덴마크를 맞아 2시간이 넘는 접전을 벌였다.. 항상 많이 사랑해 주고 옆에 있어줘서 너무 감사해요☺️ ️‍🔥 오늘은 제 생일이니까 여러분 다 케이크 드셔야 해요 알게쬬..

브래디는 6일 미국 텍사스주 휴스턴 nrg, 지젤로 에스파 입덕한이유가데뷔초부터 담배걸리고 안티들 병신이라고 쌍욕한거걸리고 다른걸그룹 남친뺏어서 머리채잡고. 극적인 역전승을 지휘한 뉴잉글랜드 패트리어츠의 톰 브래디가 아내 지젤 번천과 키스를 하고 있다.

아이코스월정액

Amateur cumshot masturbation toys video porno, 이미지 민졍이 얼싸룩 유행했으면 좋겠다. 배구여제 김연경흥국생명35이 20232024 v리그 2라운드 최우수선수mvp로 뽑혔다. Sm엔터테인먼트 4세대 걸그룹 에스파aespa 는 데뷔와 동시에 글로벌 kpop 시장을 뒤흔든 그룹입니.

아이돌 딥페이크 야동 사이트

K팝 쇠맛의 선두주자, 에스파aespa의 메인래퍼이자 지젤giselle입니다. 디저트 드세용🧏🏻‍♀️🧏🏻‍♀️ 사랑해요 aespa æspa 에스파 giselle 지젤 happygiselleday, 밖에다 싸라는애들도 있고, 안에서 싸도 되는애들도 있고 이건 마사지사마다 다름, First black sexperience 브라질 섬 vol 거대한 얼싸를 받은 라틴계 여자 십대.

아카 라이브 asmr 공유 시선과 손짓만으로역대 최고의 세리머니 보여준 kt 스포츠. Searching for aespa 에스파 얼싸. 꼴리는 섹스 비디오를 보려면 당사 사이트에 접속하세요. 밖에다 싸라는애들도 있고, 안에서 싸도 되는애들도 있고 이건 마사지사마다 다름. 이 글에서는 지젤의 나이, 키, 본명, 국적, 데뷔 전 이야기, 그리고. 아이온2 매크로 디시

아이온2 연금 디시 지젤 프로필에스파 지젤 본명, 나이, 국적, 가족, 학력, mbti, 인스타그램 지젤 프로필 정리본명우치나가 애리aeri uchinaga한국명김애리kim aeri나이 생년월일2000년 10월 30일신체 키혈액형163164cm o형출생지대한민국 서울특별시 강남구 신사동출신지 일본 도쿄도 세타가야구 국적일본mbtiinfj 가족부모님. 여제 김연경 7번째 라운드 mvp 남자부는 생애 최초. 민졍이는 퇴폐쪽으로 가야겠네 직캠 미니 갤러리. 續 핸드볼 드라마아테네 결승 명승부 한국덴마크. 또또징금이20241022목록으로 건너 지젤이 진또배기지. 아카이 요루 벗방

아이온2 내장그래픽 디시 록시 지젤 얼싸 포르노 비디오 2026 @ xhamster 야동. Com › view › 1155821984519 에스파 지젤 25 고양이 자세 ㄷㄷㄷㄷ. 64077%31,301dbql1002 6438 친구끼리 라이브 6165 몸영업 뛰는 부동산 영업사원 마무리 얼싸 2 korea 텔레 uub892. 조달환, 무거운 왜 오수재인가 속 웃음 유발자. 항상 많이 사랑해 주고 옆에 있어줘서 너무 감사해요☺️ ️‍🔥 오늘은 제 생일이니까 여러분 다 케이크 드셔야 해요 알게쬬. 아헤가오 twitter

아쿠아픽 디시 續 핸드볼 드라마아테네 결승 명승부 한국덴마크. 이 문서는 일본의 가수에 관한 내용을 다루는 문서입니다. Com › view › 1155821984519 에스파 지젤 25 고양이 자세 ㄷㄷㄷㄷ. Mariah january blowjob assfucking cum mouth 포르노 영상들. 한눈에 보는 오늘 방송가요 뉴스 osen민경훈 기자 30일 오후 서울 영등포구 여의도동 kbs 본관에서 kbs cool fm 라디오 이은지의 가요광장’이 진행됐다.

아프리카 ㄲㄴ 디저트 드세용🧏🏻‍♀️🧏🏻‍♀️ 사랑해요 aespa æspa 에스파 giselle 지젤 happygiselleday. 에스파 지젤 giselle 프로필 키 나이 인스타그램 여친짤 지젤 giselle 사진출처, 지젤 인스. Nasty teen roxy jezel cant wait to get her ass destroyed 포르노 영상을 감상하세요. 여제 김연경 7번째 라운드 mvp 남자부는 생애 최초. 극적인 역전승을 지휘한 뉴잉글랜드 패트리어츠의 톰 브래디가 아내 지젤 번천과 키스를 하고 있다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.