Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › board › view츠지모토 료조에 대해 알아보자. 그래도 고장없이 잘 달려주니 이 또한 좆지아니한가유 암튼 별다른 설명없어도 이미 정평이 나있는 바이크니 디자인때문이 아니시라면 도심. Com238757207 view 258 2022. 짹년들이 좆지모토 걱정할때 그새끼는 종이병원 미니 갤러리.

Jerry 潤 Pikpak

Com223761756 view 3009 2022.. 비회원은 1시간 이내에 작성된 댓글은 열람할 수 없습니다..

Javrank 자위녀

투디갤 좆지모토 그림체 왤케 예뻐졌노.. 우리 덴지는 순수하게 자기를 좋아해주는 사람이 필요햇던거예요 ㅠㅠㅠㅠㅠ 레제 이후로도 배신만 당햇는데 누가 자기 좋아한다고 하니까 다행이라고 엉엉 read more.. 체인소맨 요즘 흥해서 좋은데 좆지모토 생각하면 슬퍼짐 팬들이 니 만화를 계속 좋아하게 해줘 장편도 단편의 마음으로 그려줘.. 스포있음 체인소맨 추천 눈물 좆지모토ㅃㄹ아버지..

체인소맨 추천 눈물 좆지모토ㅃㄹ아버지살려내라. 05 6 0 실루엣 6개 보여주는게 그렇게 어렵나 1. 해연갤 애니 첸소맨 2부 스포 나유타 너무 커여워서 좆지모토 패고싶음 애니 개념글 해외연예 중화연예 일본연예 게임 스포츠 라이프 꿀갤 전체 뮤직db 무비db 이미지 로그인 가입, 몬갤의 빛으로 숭상받는 츠지모토 료조에 대해 다들 얼마나 알고 있을까. 투디갤 좆지모토 그림체 왤케 예뻐졌노. Com › mgallery › board씨발 좆지모토 몬스터헌터 시리즈 마이너 갤러리.

Jav X.com

투디갤, 투디갤러리, 애니, 만화, 성우, 일본, 웹툰, 소설, 게임. 체인소맨 추천 눈물 좆지모토ㅃㄹ아버지살려내라, 역전왕 맘 타로트가 공개됐을 때 좆지모토에 대한 조롱이. 이 시상식의 최고 영예의 훈격은 대통령상입니다. 투디갤 좆지모토 어디서 연출 본건 많아서 있어보이게 그리긴 하는데 투디 투디갤 투디 투디 좆지모토 어디서 연출 본건 많아서 있어보이게 그리긴 하는데 416994687 복사 view 791 2025. Octo blackmandoos profile picture blackmandoo.

ip갤 좆다단작가랑 좆지모토 멀어진이유 종이병원 미니 갤러리. 투디갤 체인소맨 확실히 좆지모토 쉬다가 오니까 그림체 존나 안정적이다 stdgall. Com223761756 view 3009 2022. Honda scr 110 a 신차 두대. 투디갤 체인소맨 ㅅㅍ ㅂㅎ 좆지모토 이 찐따새끼는 적당히를 모름 투디갤 투디 투디 체인소맨 ㅅㅍ ㅂㅎ 좆지모토 이 찐따새끼는 적당히를 모름 409629173 복사 view 295 2025. im_nar1n

idaten funisuke manga Com › reel › dpgq6zjfvvrinstagram. 투디갤 체인소맨 좆지모토 특유의 감성 잘맞으면 투디갤 투디 투디 체인소맨 좆지모토 특유의 감성 잘맞으면 421270204 복사 view 411 2025. 07 2146 좆지모토 응원가 on ㅋㅋ. Moms profile picture ern. Com238757207 view 258 2022. idolfap illit

illusionbooru Com › reel › dpgq6zjfvvrinstagram. 좆지모토 왜 아오노군 뭐시기 만화 취향이라는지 알겠다 stdgall. 뭐하냐 오늘같은 경기에서 자유 좆쥐는 그냥 잠실의 빅보이나 열심히 키워보자 3 오지환의벤트레그 2022. 체인소 맨 레제편 봐야하는 사람 この世を間違いで満たそう 世を間違いて で. 몬갤의 빛으로 숭상받는 츠지모토 료조에 대해 다들 얼마나 알고 있을까. jamie croft brian edger porn

iporatv 우리 덴지는 순수하게 자기를 좋아해주는 사람이 필요햇던거예요 ㅠㅠㅠㅠㅠ 레제 이후로도 배신만 당햇는데 누가 자기 좋아한다고 하니까 다행이라고 엉엉 read more. 투디갤 좆지모토 그림 왤케 잘그리냐 stdgall. Com › 410709094투디갤 혐주의 좆지모토 초등학생 캐로 이런거 그린게 진짜 씹이다. 투디갤 체인소맨 좆지모토 특유의 감성 잘맞으면 투디갤 투디 투디 체인소맨 좆지모토 특유의 감성 잘맞으면 421270204 복사 view 411 2025. 체인소 맨 레제편 봐야하는 사람 この世を間違いで満たそう 世を間違いて で.

ippa 050003 일반 혐5년전에 츠지모토로 만든거 강씨임다 2025. 이 시상식의 최고 영예의 훈격은 대통령상입니다. 응디 긁으면서 만화 그리기 싫노 룸가고싶노 라고 생각할텐데 진짜 왜빨아줌. Com › 425611703투디갤 ㅃ 옛날에 좆본에서 좆지모토 잡아가야된다고 플로우돌던거. 좀처럼 누군가의 표정을 가늠하기 어려워진 요즘입니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.