Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

274 likes, 10 comments haein_hyun2 on febru 준희랑진아랑 디시 시작핸 holyhaein junghaein team_junghaein 정해인 밥잘사주는예쁜누나 서준희. 그가 앞으로도 깊이 있는 사람들과 연결되게 할 것이다. 정해인은 aoa의 뮤직비디오 출연으로 데뷔하였으며 데뷔전 미리 군대를 다녀온 배우다. 2018년 에서 주연으로 출연하면서 인지도가 급상승했다.

히토미 소리

2018년 에서 주연으로 출연하면서 인지도가 급상승했다. 정해인은 꽃과 나무들이 무성하게 성장하는. Com › dragontosu › 223206664533정해인 사주 네이버 블로그.

힡ᆢ미

성격, 연애, 직업 등 다양한 분야에 대한 사주 풀이를 통해 당신의 운세를 깊이 있게 해석해 드립니다. 둥근 얼굴은 인 仁을 상징하는 관상입니다. 오늘은 정해인 사주를 기반으로 그의 성격・기질・잠재력까지 자세히 정리해 드릴게요, 274 likes, 10 comments haein_hyun2 on febru 준희랑진아랑 디시 시작핸 holyhaein junghaein team_junghaein 정해인 밥잘사주는예쁜누나 서준희, Com › @starddoong › post정해인 사주 풀이 뚱이사주 postype, 선수입장 의문의 쪽지를 받고 모처에 모인 8인의 크리에이터들.

정해인의 사주에 대한 분석과 연애 운세를 알아보세요, 좋은 연출, 적절한 액션, 코믹 요소, 긴장감, 주제의식이 골고루 잘 녹아들었다는 평가를 받고 있다. 정해인 역시 21세에 입대, 병역을 마치고 26살에 데뷔했다. 이런 사주는 똑같은 잘못을 해도 남들보다 더 잘 빠져나갈 수 있습니다. 그의 캐릭터 소화력과 인간적인 매력은 사주적으로도 흥미롭게 해석됩니다, 이런 사주는 똑같은 잘못을 해도 남들보다 더 잘 빠져나갈 수 있습니다.

히토미 팝업 안뜨게

칰촠님이 요청해주신 배우 정해인 사주입니다 사진출처 나무위키 배우 정해인은 을묘월 병술일주로 삼주상 인수격입니다.. Com › discover › 정해인김새름디시tiktok.. 와 일단 사랑 받기에 아주 특화되어 있는 사주입니다..

정해인의 사주에 대한 분석과 연애 운세를 알아보세요. 찢재명은 제가 4월달에 여기에 사주 감정을 해놨는데 한번 검색해서 보셔요. 4월달에 태어나셨기 때문에 병진월이 아닐까 싶지만 절기 상, 을묘월로 보게 됩니다. 그들은 왜, 누구에 의해 이곳에 모인 걸까.

히토미 연애혁명

이 사주 생각보다 상당히 수다스러워요. 인성, 식상의 조합으로 교육자 사주에 가깝다, 그의 캐릭터 소화력과 인간적인 매력은 사주적으로도 흥미롭게 해석됩니다, 이런 사주 구조로 되어 있는데 너무 부모가 아이에 대해서 강하게 자신의 직업을 이어나가라고 말하면 안되겠다.

보통좋으면 잘맞으면 작품 잘되던데 dc official app, 식상이 많아서 연기 표현을 하는데 타고난 재능이 있다. 손님의 요청으로 정해인씨의 사주를 풀이합니다. 삼주상으로는 전형적인 예술가의 사주입니다, 포근하고 부드러우며 인정이 많은 성격을 가지고 있다. 인성, 식상의 조합으로 교육자 사주에 가깝다.

히토미 치즈루 남자에 미쳐서 같은 여자 때리는 사주 역갤러 장담하는데 여자 돈주고사는사람 50%넘음 ㅇㅇ 찐기신운은 억까당하는 운이아님 역갤러 4년 백수 취업했어 역갤러 천간겁재가 질투많네 어쩌네해서 개빡쳐서글씀 역갤러 남자들은 진짜 싸패인듯 ㅇㅇ. 여기서만 있는 연애운, 이상형 및 다양한 부분들. 정해인 역시 21세에 입대, 병역을 마치고 26살에 데뷔했다. 링크 좀 나도 볼래ㅋㅋ 근데 윤여정 사수글보면 믿을건 못되긴하더라. 병술 백호일주에 욕지浴支 도화가 강하며 연年에 화개살까지 연예계나 예능 방면으로 풀어가라는 사주의 구성을 타고났다. 히토미 왕따

히토미 숏컷 오늘은 배우 정해인 님의 사주를 풀어보려고 합니다. 찢재명은 제가 4월달에 여기에 사주 감정을 해놨는데 한번 검색해서 보셔요. 식상이 많아서 연기 표현을 하는데 타고난 재능이 있다. 링크 좀 나도 볼래ㅋㅋ 근데 윤여정 사수글보면 믿을건 못되긴하더라. 성격, 연애, 직업 등 다양한 분야에 대한 사주 풀이를 통해 당신의 운세를 깊이 있게 해석해 드립니다. 히토미 전생슬

히토미 쿠지락스 이거 정해인 사주 풀이인데 맞는거같음. 저 이쁘장한 얼굴로 또라이 연기가 인상적이였는데, 첨으로 정해인씨가 연기를 잘하는구나라고 느꼈다. Com › board › lists정해인 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 정해인 사주 재물, 애정, 직업, 성격, 건강 다산 정약용의 직계 6대손으로 조상인 정약용도 당대 소문난 꽃미남이었으며, 당시 기록에 의하면 얼굴이 희고 단아하게 생겨서 정조는 남자인 정약용을 보고 아름답다고 칭찬하였다고 합니다. 스타데일리뉴스서태양기자 지난 22일부터 28일까지 진행된 디시트렌드 남자배우 인기투표에서 정해인이 95만 8,947표를 획득하며 1위를 차지했다. 히토미 엔주

히토미 에러 2018년 에서 주연으로 출연하면서 인지도가 급상승했다. 일지 술토속의 신금여자를 화극금으로 녹여 버리기 때문에 여자가 들어와도 도움이 되지 않는다. 시간을 빼고 삼주로 풀이하는 것 이기 때문에 변수가 따르는 점. 드라마 ‘밥 잘 사주는 예쁜 누나’ 남자 주인공 정해인 열풍 2000년대 들어 연하남들 연이어 등장, 드라마 ‘로망스’의 김재원이 원조 연하남. 정해인은 꽃과 나무들이 무성하게 성장하는.

히토미 채색 성격, 연애, 직업 등 다양한 분야에 대한 사주 풀이를 통해 당신의 운세를 깊이 있게 해석해 드립니다. Com › board › view난 여잔데 정해인 개쎄하던데 200606202109 역학 갤러리. 저 이쁘장한 얼굴로 또라이 연기가 인상적이였는데, 첨으로 정해인씨가 연기를 잘하는구나라고 느꼈다. Com › @starddoong › post정해인 사주 풀이 뚱이사주 postype. 그가 앞으로도 깊이 있는 사람들과 연결되게 할 것이다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.