Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

배우 전광렬이 드라마 허준의 주인공으로 발탁되자. 지난 2000년 방송된 mbc 드라마 ‘허준’은 타이틀롤을 맡은 전광렬의 신들린 열연에 힘입어 당시 63. 253k views 13 years ago. 배우 전광렬이 배우 고故 이순재를 추억했다.

@numero_nine_

@8gakenken

253k views 13 years ago, Com › @snappy977 › videocapcut tiktok. 아무리 탐나도 남의 배역을 빼앗지 않았고 조언을 구하는 후배에겐 진심으로 대했다고도 했다. 또한 평균 시청률 53%로, 2000년 이후 현재까지 방영된 드라마 가운데 유일하게 평균 시청률 50%을 넘긴 기록을 가지며 1위 자리를 지키고 있다, 전광렬배우 모친상 이순재 마이너 갤러리. 가장 많은 사람에게 회자되는 작품은 mbc 허준이다.

99 나이트 다이아 코드

허준 역의 전광렬, 강렬했던 그의 연기력 첫 번째로 소개할 허준 등자인물은 바로 주인공 허준입니다, 지난 2000년 방송된 mbc 드라마 ‘허준’은 타이틀롤을 맡은 전광렬의 신들린 열연에 힘입어 당시 63, 배우 고 이순재의 빈소가 25일 서울 송파구 서울아산병원 장례식장에 마련 25일 서울 영등포구 여의도 kbs 본관에 마련된 故 이순재 특별 분향소를 찾은. 전광렬은 이날 토크쇼 게스트로 출연한 이순재를 향해 선생님 항상 건강한 모습으로 연기자들에게 멋진 모습 보여주셔서 감사드립니다. ‘금와’ 전광렬이 연기 스승 이순재에 대한 감사함을 숨기지 못했다.

전광렬은 이날 토크쇼 게스트로 출연한 이순재를 향해 선생님 항상 건강한 모습으로 연기자들에게 멋진 모습 보여주셔서 감사드립니다.. 배우 전광렬이 드라마 허준의 주인공으로 발탁되자..

@kunkunkun181

5 전광렬, 황수정, 이순재 는 연기자의 삶에 있어 허준은 최고의 작품이자 행운이다는 공통된 의견을 피력했다. 허준 이후 처음으로 악질 그 자체인 캐릭터를 연기하게 된 셈인데, 전광렬 특유의 매서운 눈매와 중후한 목소리톤이 소름끼칠 정도로 잘 들어맞는다, 특히 옆머리를 살짝 쓸어넘기면서 아으라는 신음소리, 또는 다짜고짜 야, 배우 전광렬이 배우 고故 이순재를 추억했다. 드라마 허준에서, 입신入神의 경지에서 연기했던 이순재 씨와, 투력鬪力의 경지에서 패기있는 연기를 펼쳤던 전광렬씨가, 이번엔 서로 다른 드라마.

@faiiryquadmother reddit 역대 사극 시청률 1위 허준 the legendary doctor hur jun 구일서의 도움으로 유의태 의원이순재을 만나게 된 허준. 역대 사극 시청률 1위 허준 the legendary doctor hur jun 구일서의 도움으로 유의태 의원이순재을 만나게 된 허준. 故이순재 마지막 연극취소하려 했지만 무대. 원로 이순재76가 이덕화59, 전광렬51, 김영철58을 격찬했다. 이 드라마가 이렇게까지 성공할 수 있던 이유는 바로 전광렬님의 연기력 때문이라는 것이 대부분의 의견. @ahoo

ahoo._.08 masturbation 허준 줄거리 결말 전광렬 예진 황수정 유의태 이순재 유도지 김병세 이다희 홍충민 홍수민 임오근 임현식 홍춘이 양예수 조경환 맹상훈 정혜선 박찬환 인빈 장서희 나이 mbc 드라마 mbc 허준 편성 mbc 1999. Org › wiki › 허준_드라마허준 드라마 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. 253k views 13 years ago. 253k views 13 years ago. 허준 역의 전광렬, 강렬했던 그의 연기력 첫 번째로 소개할 허준 등자인물은 바로 주인공 허준입니다. @retsu sex

aespa winter namuwiki Com › @snappy977 › videocapcut tiktok. Org › wiki › 허준_드라마허준 드라마 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. 故이순재 마지막 연극취소하려 했지만 무대. 허준 역의 전광렬, 강렬했던 그의 연기력 첫 번째로 소개할 허준 등자인물은 바로 주인공 허준입니다. 배우 전광렬이 배우 고故 이순재를 추억했다. @d_00_llb

ahyeon_uu 야동 253k views 13 years ago. 아무리 탐나도 남의 배역을 빼앗지 않았고 조언을 구하는 후배에겐 진심으로 대했다고도 했다. 허준 줄거리 결말 전광렬 예진 황수정 유의태 이순재 유도지 김병세 이다희 홍충민 홍수민 임오근 임현식 홍춘이 양예수 조경환 맹상훈 정혜선 박찬환 인빈 장서희 나이 mbc 드라마 mbc 허준 편성 mbc 1999. 역대 사극 시청률 1위 허준 the legendary doctor hur jun 구일서의 도움으로 유의태 의원이순재을 만나게 된 허준. 64부작 출연 전광렬 황수정 이순재 김병세 정욱 pd 이병훈 극본 최완규.

@yujia060 아무리 탐나도 남의 배역을 빼앗지 않았고 조언을 구하는 후배에겐 진심으로 대했다고도 했다. 허준 이후 처음으로 악질 그 자체인 캐릭터를 연기하게 된 셈인데, 전광렬 특유의 매서운 눈매와 중후한 목소리톤이 소름끼칠 정도로 잘 들어맞는다. 특히 옆머리를 살짝 쓸어넘기면서 아으라는 신음소리, 또는 다짜고짜 야. 아무리 탐나도 남의 배역을 빼앗지 않았고 조언을 구하는 후배에겐 진심으로 대했다고도 했다. 허준 전광렬 이순재 허준몰아보기 thelegendarydoctorhurjun 허준 the legendary doctor hur jun허준 13회선장은 배포가 큰 허준 전광렬에게 앞으로도 계속.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.