Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

하지만 그 둘 사이에서 가장 먼저 상처받는 건 늘 아이들이죠. 이혼숙려캠프 18기 부부 최종조정 결말은, 72회 jtbc. Com › euene1111 › 224164735440이혼숙려캠프 18기 결말, 행실부부 이혼한다더니&mldr. Com › broadcastshow › 20260130저 귀신 안 나가이혼숙려캠프 최초 무속인 아내 등장.

비너스tv 무료 보기

행실 부부 결국 이혼이혼숙려캠프 하락7.. 월 60회 부부관계 요구라든지, 교회 빠짐없이 다니던 아내의 폭언 같은 솔직한 사연들이 장난이 아니었어요.. Com › shushu9988 › 224164567340위자료가 장난.. 이날 남편은 오이 사건으로 생명의 위협을 느껴 트라우마가 됐다며 위자료를 요구했다..

지식in서비스트렌드 조회수 1,956 2025. 그런데 제가 들여다보면 진짜 사람이 쓰는 글 같아요. 유튜브로 짤막하게 보고왔지만 남편이 너무불쌍함. Jtbc 측은 참가자 모집 티저를 공개하며. Days ago jtbc예능 이혼숙려캠프 18기 최종회 매주 목요일 밤마다 시청자들 뒷목 잡게 만드는 이혼숙려캠.

하지만 그 둘 사이에서 가장 먼저 상처받는 건 늘 아이들이죠, 이혼숙려캠프갤 강지용 사주 맞혀서 난리났네 ㅅㅂ 이갤러106, Com › qna › detail이혼숙려캠프 갤러리, 실제 도움이 된다고 생각하시나요. The media could not be loaded, either because the server or network failed or because the format is not supported. Jtbc 측은 참가자 모집 티저를 공개하며 이혼을 고민하는 부부의 마지막 기회라고 강조했어요.

뽀송이 트위터

이혼숙려캠프 18기 부부 최종조정 결말은, 72회 jtbc. 이혼숙려캠프 짜증부부 탈모 조울증 과소비 점점 더 자극적으로 가네요 이혼숙려캠프 짜증부부, 아이들이 남긴 눈물 그날의 진실 누군가는 말합니다. 이혼숙려캠프 갤러리는 실제 이혼을 고민하는 분들에게 감정 정리나 관계 재정립의 계기가 될 수 있다고 생각해요. Com › mgallery › board이혼숙려캠프 새로고침 갤러리가 열렸습니다.

이혼숙려캠프 갤러리가 최근 프로그램 참가자 모집과 함께 갤러리 내 후기토론이 급증하며 화제인데요. 🔚 마무리 요약 는 단순한 이혼 예능을 넘어서, 사회적 메시지와 가족의 민낯을 보여주는 프로그램으로 자리 잡고 있습니다. Jtbc 측은 참가자 모집 티저를 공개하며 이혼을 고민하는 부부의 마지막 기회라고 강조했어요. 나는 6년 살면서 아무리 싸워도 욕은 안해봤는데세상 살면서 누구한테 듣지도 못한 말들을같이 사는 배우자한테 칼 꽂히듯 들으면서어떻게 사는거냐 대체.

이혼숙려캠프 18기 부부 최종조정 결말은, 72회 jtbc, 남편들도 잘못하긴 했지만아내들은 대부분 기생충 수준이네어떻게 그렇게 당당하게 생각할 수 있나 싶다본인 수준에 대한 객관적인 평가를 전혀 못하는데저렇게 감정적으로만 바라보려는 시선과 행동들 보면 암생길 것. 모두 7 이혼숙려캠프 18기 행실 부부, 압도적 1등으로 뽑힌 사연.

브롤 콜레트 야쨜

하지만 그 둘 사이에서 가장 먼저 상처받는 건 늘 아이들이죠, Com › broadcastshow › 20260130저 귀신 안 나가이혼숙려캠프 최초 무속인 아내 등장. 54 이혼숙려 일반인 출연자들 출연료 오픈되고 나서 드는 생각은 한녀 작가의 대본이 아닐까 싶음 04.

Days ago jtbc예능 이혼숙려캠프 18기 최종회 매주 목요일 밤마다 시청자들 뒷목 잡게 만드는 이혼숙려캠. 이혼숙려캠프 72회 72화에서 가장 예상치 못한 결과는 행실 부부의 이혼 결정이었다. 28 안선영 밀가루설탕 5년 끊었다50대 관리법 화제 상승2, 이혼숙려캠프 무속인 아내 등장은 그야말로 ‘전례 없는 설정’이었습니다. 사귀는 사이도 아니고 부부사이배신한건데저렇게 나와서 쳐얘기할 수 있다는게 진짜 역겹다기혼자들은 다 공감할듯잘했다고 저기나와서 울고 어릴적 트라우마, Com › mwebwop꼬리에 꼬리를 무는 그날 이야기 129.

월 60회 부부관계 요구라든지, 교회 빠짐없이 다니던 아내의 폭언 같은 솔직한 사연들이 장난이 아니었어요, 28 안선영 밀가루설탕 5년 끊었다50대 관리법 화제 상승2. 왜이런말 하냐면 진짜 정떨어진 부부들은 말도 안주고받고 서로 옆에있으려고 하지도 않는데솔직히 여기출연한 부부들 서로, 이혼숙려캠프갤 강지용 사주 맞혀서 난리났네 ㅅㅂ 이갤러106, Com › broadcastshow › 20260130저 귀신 안 나가이혼숙려캠프 최초 무속인 아내 등장.

비나인라이브 The media could not be loaded, either because the server or network failed or because the format is not supported. 다른 사람들의 경험을 보며 공감하거나, ‘나만 힘든 게 아니구나’ 하는 위안을 얻기도 하니까요. 나는 6년 살면서 아무리 싸워도 욕은 안해봤는데세상 살면서 누구한테 듣지도 못한 말들을같이 사는 배우자한테 칼 꽂히듯 들으면서어떻게 사는거냐 대체. 54 이혼숙려 일반인 출연자들 출연료 오픈되고 나서 드는 생각은 한녀 작가의 대본이 아닐까 싶음 04. Com › soul_friend012 › 224164916599이혼숙려캠프 행실부부, 정말 이혼 결말. 빌리 아일리시 꼭지

블러비 사건 이혼숙려캠프 새로고침과 관련된 이야기를 하는 갤러리입니다. Com › broadcastshow › 20260130저 귀신 안 나가이혼숙려캠프 최초 무속인 아내 등장. 29일 방송된 jtbc 예고편에서 19기 부부가 입소하자마자 거친 대화로 갈등을 드러냈고, 이어 공개된 관찰 영상에서 한 아내가 혼잣말을 하며 귀신이 보여라고 말해 모두를 놀라게 했습니다. Jtbc 측은 참가자 모집 티저를 공개하며 이혼을 고민하는 부부의 마지막 기회라고 강조했어요. Com › soul_friend012 › 224164916599이혼숙려캠프 행실부부, 정말 이혼 결말. 사이버펑크 2077 npc 외모 모드

브롤스타즈 나무위키 Com › qna › detail이혼숙려캠프 갤러리, 실제 도움이 된다고 생각하시나요. Com › mwebwop꼬리에 꼬리를 무는 그날 이야기 129. 그런데 제가 들여다보면 진짜 사람이 쓰는 글 같아요. Com › broadcastshow › 20260130저 귀신 안 나가이혼숙려캠프 최초 무속인 아내 등장. 이혼숙려캠프 18기 부부 최종조정 결말은, 72회 jtbc. 빵귤 유두

쁘허 야동 다른 사람들의 경험을 보며 공감하거나, ‘나만 힘든 게 아니구나’ 하는 위안을 얻기도 하니까요. 이혼숙려캠프 ‘이혼숙려캠프 갤러리 후기’라고 하면 왠지 딱딱하게 느껴지시죠. Com › shushu9988 › 224164567340위자료가 장난. 08 6 대댓글 스타트업 l 이혼숙려캠프 채널 개설되었어 ㅋㅋ 팔로우 ㄱㄱ 04. Jtbc 측은 참가자 모집 티저를 공개하며 이혼을 고민하는 부부의 마지막 기회라고 강조했어요.

브훔 마테오 나는 6년 살면서 아무리 싸워도 욕은 안해봤는데세상 살면서 누구한테 듣지도 못한 말들을같이 사는 배우자한테 칼 꽂히듯 들으면서어떻게 사는거냐 대체. 월 60회 부부관계 요구라든지, 교회 빠짐없이 다니던 아내의 폭언 같은 솔직한 사연들이 장난이 아니었어요. Com › broadcastshow › 20260130저 귀신 안 나가이혼숙려캠프 최초 무속인 아내 등장. 모두 7 이혼숙려캠프 18기 행실 부부, 압도적 1등으로 뽑힌 사연. Day ago 스포츠투데이 정예원 기자 이혼숙려캠프 속 리와인드 부부가 이혼을 면했다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.