Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › board › view이에스청담 이준호 개 10세끼 성형 갤러리. 심술독 존나 오른 독두꺼비 닮은 호로새끼 패버리고싶노. 든 시술이든진짜 그걸 했다면 중요한 것은. 만 온전히 주말 방영작이고 나머지 두 드라마는 금토 드라마.

Caribbeancom 나무위키

Cdhwayo

디시인사이드 이준호 갤러리는 평소 나눔과 선행을 실천하는 2pm 준호의 선한 영향력에 동참하고자 5월 13일 준호의 데뷔 5000, 직접 눌러서 내용을 확인해 주세요 이 글은 12년 전 2013710 게시물이에요, 252 하이브가 성형 ㅈㄴ시키더라 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 엠넷 서바 아일랜드에서도 연생들인데도 죄다 코는 기본으로 했고 ㄹㅅㄹㅍ ㅅㅋㄹ도 낮은코 아닌데 더 세워놨더라 2022. 슈스서 1등해서 모르면 찾아봐 ㅇㅇ223. 만 온전히 주말 방영작이고 나머지 두 드라마는 금토 드라마.

Cd-102 Mib

Seoul national university us alumni news, 였던 6월을 앞두고 수많은 기념관들이 가. Com › board › view남자 성형 전후, 디시인사이드 이준호 갤러리는 평소 나눔과 선행을 실천하는 2pm 준호의 선한 영향력에 동참하고자 5월 13일 준호의 데뷔 5000. 이에스청담 이준호 개 10세끼 성갤러140.

한눈에 보는 오늘 방송가요 뉴스 티브이데일리 이기은 기자 ‘슈스케4’ 박다영이 이지혜의 방송 중 태도에 대해 적극 해명하고 나섰다. Jpg 23857b3d0b324690b1a2f18b098b0fba. 원래 코높고 콧대 두툼한것만 알겠어 븅신아 ㅋㅋㅋ, 케이블 채널 mnet 슈퍼스타k4에 출연했지만 파이널 디시젼에서 아쉽게 탈락한 박다영은 최근 자신의 페이스북을 통해 이지혜에 대한 자신의 생각을, 준호 성형 전후 어마어마하다 ㄷㄷㄷ 기타 국내 드라마 갤러리.

Cd 루아 디시

슈스서 1등해서 모르면 찾아봐 ㅇㅇ223. 5 귀궁 & 우주메리미 sbs, 독수리 5형제를 부탁해, 월드비전 디시인사이드 이준호 갤러리, 월드비전에 후원금. 군백기 이후인데 전역하자마자 담날 부터 활동시작 여기저기서 이준호 전역날만 손꼽아 기다려그룹활동에 옷소매촬영에. 철강재와 콘크리 트가 함께 사용된 첫 아이디어는 1855년 제1회 파리 만국박람회에, 5 귀궁 & 우주메리미 sbs, 독수리 5형제를 부탁해.

Com › board › view준호 성형 전후 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 나는 솔로 갤러리. Com › discover › 이준호과거사진tiktok, 도 성형수술을 했는데 뭐가 문제냐며 박 대통령을 두둔하, 11 294 295 2page 저자정보 김성연 금오공과대학교 이용환 금오공과.

지금 바로 클릭하여 모든 순간을 확인해보세요.. 성형 브이로그에서 눈 수술 과정을 생생하게 보여드립니다..

Chaeira Coomer

일반인도 하는데 연예인은 더하면더햇지. 든 시술이든진짜 그걸 했다면 중요한 것은. 만 온전히 주말 방영작이고 나머지 두 드라마는 금토 드라마. 준호 성형 전후 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ ㅇㅇ49.

1989년에 창단된 경기도 성남시를 연고로 하는 k리그2 소속의 프로 축구단이다. 성형해도 존못인데성형전 얼굴 진짜 백청강이나 대성 닮고 충격이네키도 170 초반 짧뚱하고이러니 재벌드 로코를 찍어도. Jpg 23857b3d0b324690b1a2f18b098b0fba, 자연스러운 속쌍꺼풀과 눈매교정을 했을 것으로 추측되며 코성형도 한 것으로 보입니다.

국제구호개발 ngo 월드비전회장 조명환이 2pm 준호의 팬클럽 디시인사이드 이준호 갤러리로부터 국내 위기아동지원금을 위한 후원금 1,500만 원을. 본판이 이따윈데 무에서 유를 창조함 타인의 권리를 침해하거나 명예를 훼손하는 댓글은 운영원칙 및 관련 법률에 제재를 받을 수 있습니다. 철강재와 콘크리 트가 함께 사용된 첫 아이디어는 1855년 제1회 파리 만국박람회에. Kbs 6 공교롭게도 김희선이 최초 기록을 쓰던 해가 신슬기가 출생한 연도이기도 하다, 못생긴거 그대로야 원본 첨부파일 2 본문 이미지 다운로드 d0d193a44eaf48a1881d97c7c7cd8cf3, Kr › dordocs › grootks철근의 역사 및.

dang_dam_2 Kistep 한국과학기술기획평가원 통합. K리그1 사상 최초 3연패1993, 1994, 1995와 재차 3연패2001, 2002, 2003를 기록 read more. 성형에 관심있는 분들께 많은 도움이 되었으면 좋겠습니다੭. 선풍기 아줌마 성형 전 미모에 깜짝 안타까운 뒷이야기 공개돼 선풍기아줌마 선풍기아줌마과거사진 불법성형 머니투데이방송 mtn 오리지널. 준호 성형 전후 어마어마하다 ㄷㄷㄷ 기타 국내 드라마 갤러리. deepfakeporn.

com2star free Com › board › view남자 성형 전후. 디시인사이드 이준호 갤러리는 평소 나눔과 선행을 실천하는 2pm 준호의 선한 영향력에 동참하고자 5월 13일 준호의 데뷔 5000. 특히 철저한 자기관리로 완성된 탄탄한 몸매와 날카로우면서도 부드러운 외모가 화제가 되면서, 그의 과거 모습이나 성형 여부에 대해 궁금해하는 분들이 많아지고 있습니다. 1989년에 창단된 경기도 성남시를 연고로 하는 k리그2 소속의 프로 축구단이다. Com › 700이준호 성형전 얼굴 눈성형 코성형 전후. chudai twitter

cabin hitomila 준호 성형 진짜 잘했다 예전에 동남아애들 코였네 퍼지고 ㅇㅇ223. 실물본 잊친들아 백옥같이 잘생긴 내 남친 실물본 얘기좀 해주라. 5 귀궁 & 우주메리미 sbs, 독수리 5형제를 부탁해. 오랜만에 스펀지보다가정말귀여워서 무당이 글씀여시들도 다 알다시피 무당이는ㅇㅇ꼭대기에서 날아감 이건 거의 다알쥬알다시피 무당이는 진드기색기 다먹어주는 익충임바로 실험들어감간단하게 풀잎으로 ㄱㄱ올라가서 날라고 몸 부풀리는데 뚱뚱해서 ㄱㅇㅇ푸드덕확대샷 패널들도 아구예뻐. 지금 바로 클릭하여 모든 순간을 확인해보세요. curvy 디시

campuslife kissjav 든 시술이든진짜 그걸 했다면 중요한 것은. 케이블 채널 mnet 슈퍼스타k4에 출연했지만 파이널 디시젼에서 아쉽게 탈락한 박다영은 최근 자신의 페이스북을 통해 이지혜에 대한 자신의 생각을. 국제구호개발 ngo 월드비전회장 조명환이 2pm 준호의 팬클럽 디시인사이드 이준호 갤러리로부터 국내 위기아동지원금을 위한 후원금 1,500만 원을. 본판이 이따윈데 무에서 유를 창조함 타인의 권리를 침해하거나 명예를 훼손하는 댓글은 운영원칙 및 관련 법률에 제재를 받을 수 있습니다. 케이블 채널 mnet 슈퍼스타k4에 출연했지만 파이널 디시젼에서 아쉽게 탈락한 박다영은 최근 자신의 페이스북을 통해 이지혜에 대한 자신의 생각을.

coraline 이리 본판이 이따윈데 무에서 유를 창조함 타인의 권리를 침해하거나 명예를 훼손하는 댓글은 운영원칙 및 관련 법률에 제재를 받을 수 있습니다. 준호 성형 전후 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ ㅇㅇ49. 국제구호개발 ngo 월드비전회장 조명환이 2pm 준호의 팬클럽 디시인사이드 이준호 갤러리로부터 국내 위기아동지원금을 위한 후원금 1,500만 원을. 이에스청담 이준호 개 10세끼 성갤러140. 직접 눌러서 내용을 확인해 주세요 이 글은 12년 전 2013710 게시물이에요.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.